[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

testart

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
93,263
Reaction score
14,099
Her PSLE get what? AL30 or T-Score 50 go simi-Light school ah?
She seems to not have the common level of logic people have, really miracle how she made it that far

I feel she gives the vibe like always in a daze and zoned out.

She sort of like disconnected from reality. Then keep acting like she lost in her own world or daydreaming.

And she seem isn't fully present or aware of what's going on around her.

Do you guys feel so?
 

drkcynic

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
57,621
Reaction score
27,080
If they are hell bent to indulge her in her "not sure, don't know, no idea so I just imagine what I like" truth, nothing anyone says is going to matter. It's like arguing to the woke-ists. It's futile.
 

Kiwi8

Honorary Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
136,530
Reaction score
15,888
Fair...
What is Fair ?
Whose decide the Fairness now ?
From his perspective lor. Though it is possible that the Court of Appeal and the High Court, when looking into the potential appeal case, may have made the same judgment, perhaps Pritam feel that for 3 judges to have to be responsible for the decision instead of only a single judge would let the Court of Appeal judges debate more amongst themselves to deliver a more reasonable explanation to their verdict?
 

s-ghost

High Honorary Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
153,568
Reaction score
51,484
Defence asks Raeesah about WP cadres’ advice to her following her Oct 4, 2021 clarification in Parliament

Mr Andre Jumabhoy questions Ms Raeesah Khan on her WhatsApp messages with Mr Yudhishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying following her Oct 4, 2021, clarification in Parliament.

The court heard that Ms Loh had told Ms Khan to lawyer up, while Mr Nathan had advised her to be careful about what she told the lawyer.

Mr Jumabhoy asks if the cadres had told Ms Khan to own up to lying in Parliament.

She replies no.

He asks if Ms Loh’s advice was “effectively trying to block an investigation”, and she disagrees.

He asks if Mr Nathan was telling her not to tell the lawyer everything.

Ms Khan replies: “I think he’s just saying, be careful what you say to the lawyer.”
 

tongbuaydiao

Master Member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
3,542
Reaction score
1,676
I feel she gives the vibe like always in a daze and zoned out.

She sort of like disconnected from reality. Then keep acting like she lost in her own world or daydreaming.

And she seem isn't fully present or aware of what's going on around her.

Do you guys feel so?
One can infer that she's high all the time
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
147,961
Reaction score
61,354
From his perspective lor. Though it is possible that the Court of Appeal and the High Court, when looking into the potential appeal case, may have made the same judgment, perhaps Pritam feel that for 3 judges to have to be responsible for the decision instead of only a single judge would let the Court of Appeal judges debate more amongst themselves to deliver a more reasonable explanation to their verdict?
Thank you for taking my comments seriously.
I dun see it happening any more.

This is what I dun want to take place in Singapore.
Singapore should choose and walk the right path.
It is not the Singapore that we built and are defending.
 

RadEoNic

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2001
Messages
58,020
Reaction score
3,857
Defence asks Raeesah about WP cadres’ advice to her following her Oct 4, 2021 clarification in Parliament

Mr Andre Jumabhoy questions Ms Raeesah Khan on her WhatsApp messages with Mr Yudhishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying following her Oct 4, 2021, clarification in Parliament.

The court heard that Ms Loh had told Ms Khan to lawyer up, while Mr Nathan had advised her to be careful about what she told the lawyer.

Mr Jumabhoy asks if the cadres had told Ms Khan to own up to lying in Parliament.

She replies no.

He asks if Ms Loh’s advice was “effectively trying to block an investigation”, and she disagrees.

He asks if Mr Nathan was telling her not to tell the lawyer everything.

Ms Khan replies: “I think he’s just saying, be careful what you say to the lawyer.”
So her PAs endorse lying in parliament?
Should haul them up for lying to COP also?
 

mryang

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
156,984
Reaction score
17,580
Defence asks Raeesah about WP cadres’ advice to her following her Oct 4, 2021 clarification in Parliament

Mr Andre Jumabhoy questions Ms Raeesah Khan on her WhatsApp messages with Mr Yudhishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying following her Oct 4, 2021, clarification in Parliament.

The court heard that Ms Loh had told Ms Khan to lawyer up, while Mr Nathan had advised her to be careful about what she told the lawyer.

Mr Jumabhoy asks if the cadres had told Ms Khan to own up to lying in Parliament.

She replies no.

He asks if Ms Loh’s advice was “effectively trying to block an investigation”, and she disagrees.

He asks if Mr Nathan was telling her not to tell the lawyer everything.

Ms Khan replies: “I think he’s just saying, be careful what you say to the lawyer.”
 

Kiwi8

Honorary Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
136,530
Reaction score
15,888
Defence asks Raeesah about WP cadres’ advice to her following her Oct 4, 2021 clarification in Parliament

Mr Andre Jumabhoy questions Ms Raeesah Khan on her WhatsApp messages with Mr Yudhishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying following her Oct 4, 2021, clarification in Parliament.

The court heard that Ms Loh had told Ms Khan to lawyer up, while Mr Nathan had advised her to be careful about what she told the lawyer.

Mr Jumabhoy asks if the cadres had told Ms Khan to own up to lying in Parliament.

She replies no.

He asks if Ms Loh’s advice was “effectively trying to block an investigation”, and she disagrees.

He asks if Mr Nathan was telling her not to tell the lawyer everything.

Ms Khan replies: “I think he’s just saying, be careful what you say to the lawyer.”
Wah, like that she potentially can get her former aides into serious trouble sia....

This woman really, is a serious liability even to her loyal former aides. :s22:
 

mryang

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
156,984
Reaction score
17,580
So her PAs endorse lying in parliament?
Should haul them up for lying to COP also?
They were there for COP

Mr. Yudhishthra Nathan, a former WP cadre, made some revealing statements during the Committee of Privileges (COP) hearing. He exchanged messages with Raeesah Khan, suggesting that Pritam Singh wanted her to resign and that Singh "gets off scot-free" as people were unaware that he knew Khan had lied ¹. Nathan also asked Khan if Singh wanted her to resign, and Khan replied, "I think he does" ¹.

Nathan's testimony seemed to imply that Singh was aware of Khan's dishonesty but didn't take action. This led some to question Nathan's motives, with one observer calling him "superv wayang" and suggesting he thought he was "very smart" but was actually damaging the party ¹. Others criticized Nathan for being vindictive and trying to score points against Singh ¹.

It's worth noting that Nathan had previously criticized Singh's stance on LGBT rights in 2019, calling him "disingenuous" to the LGBT community ¹. This backstory adds context to Nathan's testimony and raises questions about his relationship with Singh and the WP party.
 
Last edited:

Char_Kuey

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
9,210
Reaction score
3,167
I feel she gives the vibe like always in a daze and zoned out.

She sort of like disconnected from reality. Then keep acting like she lost in her own world or daydreaming.

And she seem isn't fully present or aware of what's going on around her.

Do you guys feel so?
absolutely

the things she said during election before she turn mp is already :s22:

then the lie, then the things she said to back up what she said early, then the people she said who should be involved rather than her for the things she said :s22:
 

LoaGong12

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 11, 2021
Messages
12,712
Reaction score
4,093
Ozzie university so happening one ah?

or she take her murdoch degree locally at LSE Clementi Branch and den fly over for 1 sem only and den become "overseas ed" ah?
U now then know these Aussie degrees are low standard? Esp Murdoch.
Sydney, Melbourne, ANU only decent ones
Govt scholars dont go to Australia. Only Singaporeans who cant qualify for local Unis and have money go.
 

fryderyk

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
7,161
Reaction score
238
don't insult Lu Bu prease

example only
Erm.. Lu Bu can fight in the battlefield, this one can do what?

this one lao pei got money , just say sad story , sobbing , portray her as fragile woman said this

我却其实属于极度容易受伤的女人
不要不要不要骤来骤去
请珍惜我的心
 

mryang

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
156,984
Reaction score
17,580
Ms. Loh Pei Ying, a former WP cadre, testified during the Committee of Privileges (COP) hearing. Key points from her testimony:

1. Raeesah Khan confided in her: Loh stated that Khan shared her intention to reveal her sexual assault experience in Parliament.
2. No direction from WP leaders: Loh testified that WP leaders did not instruct Khan to lie or reveal the information.
3. Concerns about Khan's well-being: Loh expressed worries about Khan's mental health and potential backlash.
4. Internal discussions: Loh revealed internal WP discussions about Khan's statement, including concerns about its accuracy.
5. Pritam Singh's involvement: Loh stated that Singh was aware of Khan's intention to speak about her experience but did not know the details.

Loh's testimony provided insight into:

1. WP's internal dynamics
2. Khan's thought process and motivations
3. The party's handling of sensitive information

Observations:

1. Loh's testimony seemed to corroborate some aspects of Khan's account.
2. Her statements highlighted internal WP discussions and concerns.
3. The testimony shed light on WP's leadership and decision-making processes.

Sources:

- Channel News Asia (CNA)
- The Straits Times
- Committee of Privileges Report
 

Emperor_Hippo

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
23,509
Reaction score
9,588
Wah, like that she potentially can get her former aides into serious trouble sia....

This woman really, is a serious liability even to her loyal former aides. :s22:
Loyalty to this kind of ppl is like pee sai.

got time can dig, dig out oredi can mould like putty, maybe savour abit oso on the tip of the tongue. Then when feel sian or wanna clean up image, juz put the pee sai on pinky nail and den 弹指神通 it away.

never mind who it hits.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top