Husband - price is the concern.
Wife- wants the best for the child.
Solution? Science the way out. Do a excel spreadsheet, compared the milk.
DHA is not a important ingredient in a child development. In fact other acids, vitamins, iron are more important. You can introduce DHA once ur kid starts solid with fish oil. It's better absorbed than fortified DHA.
All milk are fortified with vitamins, etc. Thus weighing the brands, region, nutritional can better indicate which is a better choice over price.
Alot of manufacturers now all focus on DHA and reduces the calcium, iron, vitamins on the milk to suit consumers needs. Back in olden days, westerns gave fresh milk and in Singapore dumex (fortified milk) powder was given. You can't buy the old dumex product anymore. One serving boasts high amount of calcium which is now hard to find in all baby milk.
After balancing the nutrients, you will see most of the gold standard milk are all on par. Then country of origin will give you a better idea to choose next. You have Africa, UK, USA, Australia, India, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand. Singapore is Abbott and everything comes in a bag dehydrated and mixed in a expensive plant in tuas. It's almost the same for all other makers except the ingredients transportation period. My personal choice will be aus and NZ.
In UK, Africa, if their local produce fall short, they will procure from Australia and New Zealand.
Also you can taste the milk yourself. I am 100% that milk from aus/nz tastes better than other region. also some manufacturers do not state their milk product origin..why?they procure the cheapest base on market.
Haha I actually mix it with enfamil stage 1. Baby seems ok and no issue thus far. Currently using 50:50 ratio until fully transit to ntuc gold. In fact the nutrient do not lose out to enfamil and has in fact highest DHA.
$29 versus $59.90 .. no need to think too hard.