they earn the difference between cost to underwriter and price customer pay right?Objectively, selling would have indeed be a good outcome. This company is not viable on its own - poor product, losing market share.
Now taxpayers have to keep this zombie afloat. Dont understand why people dont see that, only want to politicize it.
Objectively, selling would have indeed be a good outcome. This company is not viable on its own - poor product, losing market share.
Now taxpayers have to keep this zombie afloat. Dont understand why people dont see that, only want to politicize it.
Swept and forgotten mahThe allianz saga never say anything. This come out and say something. How come? Dare not offend pap elders is it? Only can offend those below you
THEY COULD HAVE DONE BETTER."I am heartened that Income has accepted the court’s judgment upon reflection, and recognised that they could have done better. While I appreciate that Income will have to exercise rigour and due process, but Income must balance such matters with greater empathy and compassion."
which part of that indicates that anyone in Income has taken responsibility for this saga ? not only loss of legal costs and expenses fighting, also massive reputational loss
Elitism mindset.Swept and forgotten mah
THEY COULD HAVE DONE BETTER.
lol...the TEAM tio ABANDONED..... well played leader