Nicole Seah (佘雪玲)

  • Need someone to talk to?
    Feeling down, anxious and need help? Mental Health Helpline: 6389-2222 (24 hours) More info
Status
Not open for further replies.

hnzfaz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
8,060
Reaction score
0
I've been sort of following Nicole's political career since the start of the GE, and maybe I can shed some light.

Nicole broke down and cried on that day not because she felt helpless about the situation and couldn't work out a simple solution to help the older lady (eg loan the money). Neither was Nicole doing it to score cheap points. I don't think she's capable of doing that.

Nicole felt a keen sense of compassion for the auntie because from the auntie's story, it's appeared that she had been threatened and derided at by the RC volunteer(s), if you listen carefully to what Nicole's said to the auntie when she was sitting opposite her.

It matters not so much whether the RC did or didn't intend to ridicule the older woman, or they're playing by the rules. The meat of the matter was whether the auntie did feel hurt from her conversations with the RC volunteer(s). It's not what you say, but how you say it. According to the auntie, she was put in a room with a few others, and was spoken to without any empathy. They told the auntie something like, "it's not as if the amount is $1000; it's only $80."

Being in touch of her feelings, Nicole shed a tear, out of compassion for the auntie's situation, and partly out of indignation about the treatment the auntie had received.

Frankly from video of the RC volunteer, I could sense the haughtiness from her tone and facial expression. I'm inclined to believe the auntie's story.

As to whether Nicole did loan the money to the auntie to tie her over, I do not know the details. She might have. She did say in another interview (sorry, can't remember which) she would contact the auntie in that afternoon and would provide free tuition for the auntie's child.

From my perspective, her tears came from a heart that couldn't bear to see injustices done to the less fortunate ones in the society. She's young and she's full of idealism, and she's not jaded like some, well, many of us. We've become too cynical. Many have said that her tears aren't for real, but I think they are way off from the truth.

She's a rare breed, and totally worthy of our support for her cause. :)
 

tequila_powered

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
11,751
Reaction score
1
I've been sort of following Nicole's political career since the start of the GE, and maybe I can shed some light.

Nicole broke down and cried on that day not because she felt helpless about the situation and couldn't work out a simple solution to help the older lady (eg loan the money). Neither was Nicole doing it to score cheap points. I don't think she's capable of doing that.

Nicole felt a keen sense of compassion for the auntie because from the auntie's story, it's appeared that she had been threatened and derided at by the RC volunteer(s), if you listen carefully to what Nicole's said to the auntie when she was sitting opposite her.

It matters not so much whether the RC did or didn't intend to ridicule the older woman, or they're playing by the rules. The meat of the matter was whether the auntie did feel hurt from her conversations with the RC volunteer(s). It's not what you say, but how you say it. According to the auntie, she was put in a room with a few others, and was spoken to without any empathy. They told the auntie something like, "it's not as if the amount is $1000; it's only $80."

Being in touch of her feelings, Nicole shed a tear, out of compassion for the auntie's situation, and partly out of indignation about the treatment the auntie had received.

Frankly from video of the RC volunteer, I could sense the haughtiness from her tone and facial expression. I'm inclined to believe the auntie's story.

As to whether Nicole did loan the money to the auntie to tie her over, I do not know the details. She might have. She did say in another interview (sorry, can't remember which) she would contact the auntie in that afternoon and would provide free tuition for the auntie's child.

From my perspective, her tears came from a heart that couldn't bear to see injustices done to the less fortunate ones in the society. She's young and she's full of idealism, and she's not jaded like some, well, many of us. We've become too cynical. Many have said that her tears aren't for real, but I think they are way off from the truth.

She's a rare breed, and totally worthy of our support for her cause. :)


1. Siding with auntie without checking validity of STORY against the other auntie is so not on. Those (incl Nicole) who railed on that story were wrong by virtue of that count alone.
2. I emphatized with second auntie. Her "haughtiness" I would rather put across as anger. She had put 25 freaking years of free work as volunteer and all it took was one event and it seemed the whole world suddenly was cursing her without checking the story. For that, she should be allowed to be angry against those who railed against her on wrong facts. First auntie may be very poor and $80 was a lot to her, but this does not detract from the fact that wrong facts had been used by everyone else to slam the hardworking longserving volunteer.

But those are irrelevant to my question (as stated in my first post). The question was how Nicole handled the situation; not how she felt about the first auntie's predicament. ie my last paragraph of that post. Ta.
 

hnzfaz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
8,060
Reaction score
0
1. Siding with auntie without checking validity of STORY against the other auntie is so not on. Those (incl Nicole) who railed on that story were wrong by virtue of that count alone.
2. I emphatized with second auntie. Her "haughtiness" I would rather put across as anger. She had put 25 freaking years of free work as volunteer and all it took was one event and it seemed the whole world suddenly was cursing her without checking the story. For that, she should be allowed to be angry against those who railed against her on wrong facts. First auntie may be very poor and $80 was a lot to her, but this does not detract from the fact that wrong facts had been used by everyone else to slam the hardworking longserving volunteer.

First the facts given by the auntie aren't wrong. Please quit emphasizing the phrase 'wrong facts'. It's different POV. The fact is that the volunteer handled the situation appallingly. I'm surprised your thinking is so much in sync with the volunteer. Do you have the same experience as the volunteer, that's why you're so pek chek? How do you know the volunteer is telling the truth? Have you verified with her? Or do you know her personally and can vouch for her integrity?

The fact of the matter is, the RC was totally lacking in empathy in handling the situation. We are talking about dealing with a real person, not a bot. Even if the rules are on her side, there's such a thing called arrogance that very few people can take side with.

About your view about not checking the facts: When you hear a sad story, or something that doesn't sit well with you, do you need to first verify it before you have an emotional response? Do you watch movies or read a novel without feeling or do you need to verify the facts behind the stories?

You're suggesting that Nicole's display of emotion was either she wanted to achieve a purpose, or her EQ is questionable... I'm quite taken aback by your assumptions. Can you take a moment to believe that a person can have true compassion for another?

All the incidence tells me is that Nicole was in touch with her feelings, and she showed it. Do you have a problem with that?

How you interpret it really reflects your own psyche.

But those are irrelevant to my question (as stated in my first post). The question was how Nicole handled the situation; not how she felt about the first auntie's predicament. ie my last paragraph of that post. Ta.

Please read my post again.
 

hnzfaz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
8,060
Reaction score
0
Let's revisit the events:

1) A woman approached Nicole. She told Nicole about her financial plight, and told Nicole of her humiliating experience when she approached the RC for help, when she asked for the return of $80 she had paid.

2) Nicole was saddened by this, and cried a little. The media played it up.

3) Nicole promised to help the woman in ways she could, including offering the child free tuition.

How could the above event sequence be interpreted as weakness or a desire to score point on Nicole's part? Or Nicole's lack of action?

I suppose every well-known person must endure his/her fair share of detractors. Even Mother Theresa could not escape criticisms (and I don't mean Nicole was anywhere near Mother Theresa). Feel sorry for people who can't recognise a good soul when it stares them in the face. People have indeed become cynical about everything.

(How MANY YEARS the volunteer had served is completely immaterial. Volunteers have zero feedback mechanism. You can provide 25 years of progressively solid bad and arrogant service, and not getting 'fired'. Ring a bell?)
 
Last edited:

NTB2DO

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
22,861
Reaction score
4,961
Actually, nothing wrong with Nicole crying. There's a saying: "women are made of water", tend to cry over sob story easily. Very normal lah, hehe.
 

hnzfaz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
8,060
Reaction score
0
《前线追踪,大选之后》, Ch8 Frontline featuring Nicole Seah - 13May2011

 

zoossh

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2000
Messages
86,171
Reaction score
18,864
Even Mother Theresa could not escape criticisms (and I don't mean Nicole was anywhere near Mother Theresa).

on the contrary, great people tend to get smeared and maligned a lot more.
notable examples, mother theresa, rebiya, liu xiaobo, gandhi, dalai lama.
 

pete98

Master Member
Joined
May 16, 2001
Messages
2,877
Reaction score
0
1. Siding with auntie without checking validity of STORY against the other auntie is so not on. Those (incl Nicole) who railed on that story were wrong by virtue of that count alone.
2. I emphatized with second auntie. Her "haughtiness" I would rather put across as anger. She had put 25 freaking years of free work as volunteer and all it took was one event and it seemed the whole world suddenly was cursing her without checking the story. For that, she should be allowed to be angry against those who railed against her on wrong facts. First auntie may be very poor and $80 was a lot to her, but this does not detract from the fact that wrong facts had been used by everyone else to slam the hardworking longserving volunteer.

But those are irrelevant to my question (as stated in my first post). The question was how Nicole handled the situation; not how she felt about the first auntie's predicament. ie my last paragraph of that post. Ta.

Haughtiness can also comes from misplaced self rightousness. Btw just becos someone is a RC hardworking longserving volunteer does not make her a saint or even a nice person. Volunteers at RC may not be the same as volunteers at a eldery home or orphanage. Some of the RC personnels strikes me as being motivated by other reason than a real desire to help or serve.
 

hnzfaz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
8,060
Reaction score
0
Fan-made photomontage video for Nicole:


The music is nice~
 
Last edited:

pureman

Banned
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
14,644
Reaction score
122
Nicole Seah (佘雪玲) really think herself as damn chio

amazing :s13:

p1505112304.jpg


p1505112255.jpg


p15051122571.jpg


p15051122581.jpg


p1505112259.jpg


p15051122591.jpg


p15051122592.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top