HAHAHA. OMG. ARE YOU AN SMU FANBOY OR STH? You edited the wikipedia page today after I posted that SMU is a 'Publicly-funded private university'.
It was edited today and changed to "public, autonomous". You know people can check wikipedia edit histories right? In any case, I've emailed SMU to ask them directly and notified them of the change you (or someone) made. You can take a look at the version of the page before it was misleadingly edited. It states clearly "
publicly-funded private Singaporean university".
Why must you do such a thing? Private university very shameful meh? Or must you just prove you are right no matter what? I guess this is what they teach at SMU. If you're wrong, just change the evidence!

In any case, according to SMU's own website:
"
Being the first private university in Singapore, SMU is committed to attracting and retaining top quality faculty and staff. "
Source:
http://www.smu.edu.sg/smu/about/careers/career-opportunities/hr-policies
The comparison between the old page and the misleadingly edited page can also be seen here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...&type=revision&diff=666302775&oldid=666299254
Let me turn the tables and ask you:
private Universities very shameful Meh? Why are you reacting so strongly to a fact which is proven?
No one said being from a private university is shameful. SIM has got its strengths which makes them unique as well.
What gives you the right to criticize others for proving a point for the sake of clarity for other uses?
I like the way you overreact and start pointing fingers.
By the way, in case you didn't already know:
Wikipedia is an open online source created by the community; and can be created by groups or individuals that help contribute correct, and accurate information. It does not matter who edits it, as long as they help make information for others
clear and accurate with proper, legit references and citings that can be proven in real life. This is what makes Wikipedia a credible source for obtaining information.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Who_writes_Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing
^To put it simply,
it means anyone has the power to provide edit and update information to Wikipedia so long as, they provide proper references and cites to credible sources.
The edit will than be verified by a moderator, and should there be any disputes in the information displayed, the moderator will step in to revert the changes.
He may be right, because differing sources are saying different things. I'll wait for SMU's reply so I'll suspend my judgement till then.
However changing the source, said wikipedia page, in order to prove a point is something no one should have done. Can at least just say that the wikipedia page is mistaken instead of changing it and then using it to prove a point.
Although I concede that it might be purely purely coincidental that I quoted the page at the time before it was edited by some third, unknown party and nosferato checked it after it was edited and quoted it back to me.
Oh, I am right. I believe you have your reply from SMU. It is a Public, Autonomous University.
You would also be right about SMU being a Publicly-funded private university,
IF you had mentioned about it being that in the past or gave proper citings for it.
Also, yes. I love my University, the same way you love SIM. Do you have a problem with that?
To answer your queries:
Yes. I did check my sources before posting on this forum to inform the OP that UniSIm is a comprehensive university that has the support of the local government in terms ob subsidies/loans/bursaries and what not.
Did you actually think I pluck my sources out of thin air and say it for fun to stir? :| Even other users here are agreeing with the facts that are found online.
With regards to your post about "no one has right to change Wikipedia to prove a point", I would humbly beg to differ:
Anyone can edit Wikipedia as long as their intention is pure, and one that seeks to provide more clarity to others where knowledge is concerned, and
can provide substantial evidence to justify their work
If you are so upset about other people editing your university's Wikipedia's page, shouldn't you as an alumni or a current freshman be its ambassador do something and
step in ? Yes that's right-I'm referring to that. why don't you go and edit Uni SIM's Wikipedia page and update it based on proper references and citing's? (Right now I'm looking at UNISIM's page and there seems to be an error with regards to one of the label of "the type of university".
You are an ambassador of SIM, you fix it. You are empowered to do so. I really couldn't care less editing something that is not related to me in anyway.
All I am interested in is hanging here in HWZ chilling giving/seeking advice from others.
If you are correct, no one will fault you and the moderator/ other uses will not undo your edit. if you do a good job you can even receive a +rep and commendation by the community for being a reputable user or even become an admin.
(Something like the commend system in Dota 2-> same same but different)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Administration#How_can_I_become_an_administrator.3F
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Nominate
Oh I see. Have you regret going this route? As in like, could have work and study at the same times rather than joining the society at the age of 29?
Thanks for the replied. I would need to check with him on this.
Actually does it matter if it's local or private because NTU and Unisim are both locally recongised? No?
He was comparing between no experience at the age of 29 with NTU certificate and entry level working experience with Unisim certificate at the age of 29.
He do not have any offer from SIT. so he is only comparing between NTU and Unisim.
They are both recognized, but what they offer are two completely different packages and open up different doors, which is why posters come here and advice them on