[Official] REITs CD tracking thread

jgyy1990

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
12,422
Reaction score
88
btw asking noob question here ah.... isn't Singapore tax quite low even for corporate tax? so if REITS have to give at least 90% income tax as distribution, isn't that still quite low?
 

SpeedingBullet

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
38,817
Reaction score
1,646
Saw the Annual Report today, and the properties they are holding are quite good with famous tenants.

Perhaps I shall wait, not too sure how much will it drop after XD though as this is one keep going one way, UP!
Wait till you see how many times they've screwed their shareholders over.

Keyword: dilution :s13:

In fact it's happenin right now
 

Paul Lee

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
5,677
Reaction score
168
btw asking noob question here ah.... isn't Singapore tax quite low even for corporate tax? so if REITS have to give at least 90% income tax as distribution, isn't that still quite low?

Its 90% of net income not 90% income tax. A hellva lot of difference.:s13:

Wait till you see how many times they've screwed their shareholders over.

Keyword: dilution :s13:

In fact it's happenin right now

Alamak. The 'D' word again. Frankly speaking, all REITs face dilution regardless of whether they do a rights issues or not. Suntec has never carried out a single equity fund raising via rights issue or PO but its the king of placement issues.

I think if you are concerned about dilution, then you should not invest in REITs cos its guaranteed to happen. Or if you are not prepared to participate in rights issue, then yes, you should also stay away.

Rights issue is not a problem as long as its use for yield accretive acquisitions. Its a big problem if its used to repay bank debts because they cannot re-finance.

K-REIT is the perpetual whipping boy accused of screwing unitholders over but they are not the only one. And at least they delivered with increase in DPU. So I would put money in K-REIT ahead of many other. (Vested)
 

addict951

High Honorary Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Messages
188,205
Reaction score
20,446
K-REIT potential vestors pls take note hor
cos K-REIT had a placement at 1.33 and it gave out advance CD (Apr's CD) some weeks ago so the coming CD will be bery bery small

Same for Cache, Maple Com, AREIT and I think Capmall also? And can't remb who else
 

Dividends Warrior

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
24,905
Reaction score
2,912
K-REIT potential vestors pls take note hor
cos K-REIT had a placement at 1.33 and it gave out advance CD (Apr's CD) some weeks ago so the coming CD will be bery bery small

Same for Cache, Maple Com, AREIT and I think Capmall also? And can't remb who else

I think CapMall is normal oredi.....
 

Dividends Wizard

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
996
Reaction score
0
From my research , only 1 REIT has not move since QE3 on Sep 13 2012 , ripe for 10-20% rise :

MIT+logo.gif
 

musicwhiz55

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
1
From my research , only 1 REIT has not move since QE3 on Sep 13 2012 , ripe for 10-20% rise :

Why should the share price move just because it has not moved since September 2012? Was there any fundamental change which would cause its valuations to change? If not, this may just be reliance on optimism to enable the share price to "float up", along with the high tide.

Always remember to incorporate a good margin of safety whenever we invest. If we invest with the fear that we may miss out, and neglect to mention assess if valuations are high or low, then we would not be covering our downside sufficiently.
 

ahboy82

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
55,605
Reaction score
6,155
Why should the share price move just because it has not moved since September 2012? Was there any fundamental change which would cause its valuations to change? If not, this may just be reliance on optimism to enable the share price to "float up", along with the high tide.

Always remember to incorporate a good margin of safety whenever we invest. If we invest with the fear that we may miss out, and neglect to mention assess if valuations are high or low, then we would not be covering our downside sufficiently.

nice posting...a good reminder when many are plunging in for fear of missing out. i still refuse to go all in, scary biz now to go in for me. too humji lol :s13::s13:
 

WindBoi

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
1,861
Reaction score
16
a lot are jumping in due to the experienced players here showing their bank statements that this there is no way to lose money in this.
 

Dividends Warrior

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
24,905
Reaction score
2,912
Over the next 10 years, Power of Regional Hubs!!!:s12:

Over the next 20 years, the Power of 6.9 million population to keep shopping!!!

Woodlands Regional Hub!!!
FCT chiong!!!
20130225-bt-khaw-unveils-woodlands-regional-hub-plans-pic-01.jpg


1A5AC59ECA1654F6B8DD63B95A635.jpg


woodland-regional-hub.jpg


Jurong Regional Hub!!!
CapitaMall Trust chiong!!!
Overview-of-Jurong-Lake-District-2.jpg


jurong-lakeside-district.jpg


Jurong-slider-980x550.png
 

Dividends Wizard

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
996
Reaction score
0
Why should the share price move just because it has not moved since September 2012? Was there any fundamental change which would cause its valuations to change? If not, this may just be reliance on optimism to enable the share price to "float up", along with the high tide.

Always remember to incorporate a good margin of safety whenever we invest. If we invest with the fear that we may miss out, and neglect to mention assess if valuations are high or low, then we would not be covering our downside sufficiently.

its a comparison : Sabana up 15% , Cambridge up 25% , but MIT up 1% only .

you think which of these 3 industrial REITs would have more upside now ? and Mapletree is a much stronger sponsor .
 

musicwhiz55

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
258
Reaction score
1
you think which of these 3 industrial REITs would have more upside now ? and Mapletree is a much stronger sponsor .

The more pertinent question would be - which REIT offers more potential downside? Having the perspective of margin of safety is more important than trying to gun for higher gains - if you protect your downside based on value principles you would ensure that the upside would naturally take care of itself.

I feel it is always important to ensure we ask ourselves if the risk-reward ratio is favourable for anything we wish to purchase, based on objective assessments of value based on financial information and operational metrics.

Thanks.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top