Tuesday 13 Aug 24
On Thursday, 8 Aug, the market saw a failed attempt to push lower, followed by a sharp rally driven by lower-than-expected Jobless Claims numbers. The rally brought the market back to the 5360.25 level, which marks the halfback of the move from 1 Aug. Since then, the market has been trading sideways at this level, with a modest upward drift. While the VIX has come down, it remains elevated at 20.71. This is suggestive that while the 5120.00 bottom is secure for the moment, the market is not quite out of the woods yet.
Looking ahead, key events are on the horizon, starting with the CPI release on Wednesday. This will be followed by Retail Sales and Jobless Claims data on Thursday, and concluding with OPEX on Friday. This upcoming OPEX is particularly significant due to the large volume of hedges that were put on during the recent sell-off.
The market narrative has shifted, with increasing sentiment that the U.S. economy might not be as weak as previously feared. For the Sep FOMC, the market had previously priced in a 50 bps cut. However, this has since been adjusted to reflect even odds between a 25 bps and a 50 bps cut. This adjustment is due to the fact that, aside from the weak NFP number, there hasn’t been any empirical evidence to support the idea that the U.S. economy is crash-landing into a recession. In fact, the FED is still forecasting GDP growth of 2.9% and expects CPI to reflect price stability disinflation rather than recessionary deflation.
During market sell-offs, it is a popular sport for "experts" to critique the FED as being incompetent or behind the curve. However, it is important to remember that none of these "experts" have the resources that the FED does. The FED has a research department staffed by over 400 PhDs who have access not only to proprietary data unavailable to the public but also to detailed unit record-level published data. This allows them to analyze the numbers with a depth of understanding that no outsider can match. The FED doesn’t always get it right, but in my experience, they are far more accurate than many of the "experts" who criticize them.