Official Shiny Things thread—Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

zoneguard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2000
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
398
"Accumulating" is generally the wise choice for long-term investors because it's automatic and could help cut down on broker commissions associated with reinvesting. Either way there's absolutely no problem buying goods and services when it comes time to do that: just sell some shares, remit the proceeds, and buy your spaghetti (or whatever).

I disagree. While in accumulation phase, there is savings in the brokerage for the dividend reinvestment, eventually there will be a decumulation phase when the investor needs to incur the brokerage commissions to sell the shares for the accumulating version. See https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Comparison_of_accumulating_ETFs_and_distributing_ETFs for the detailed comparison.
 
Last edited:

flikmy

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
530
Reaction score
25
Interestingly enough, many in the finance industry arent avid stock pickers nor online stock discussion participants :s13:

True, possibly because people in finance generally have fairly stringent pre-trade approval process and can't get in and out of trades as easily. :)
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,557
Reaction score
5,575
I disagree. While in accumulation phase, there is savings in the brokerage for the dividend reinvestment, eventually there will be a decumulation phase when the investor needs to incur the brokerage commissions to sell the shares for the accumulating version.
Yes, so which do you think has a bigger impact on total wealth? The front side commissions and, in particular, lost yield (due to time out of market) that you pay over the course of decades of accumulation with a distributing fund, or the deferred commissions (that you'll pay to some degree anyway since the dividend distribution is rather unlikely to be sufficient) during the couple decades of draw down of an accumulating fund? I think in any fair, reasonable calculation the accumulating fund will win this comparison, but you're welcome to run your own simulation.
 

tesarise

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2019
Messages
849
Reaction score
126
True, possibly because people in finance generally have fairly stringent pre-trade approval process and can't get in and out of trades as easily. :)

But most pre-trade approvals will auto approve trades of ETFs that do not hold more than 15? (it's been some time since I needed to get pre-approval)% of their aum in a single company
 

zoneguard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2000
Messages
1,957
Reaction score
398
I think in any fair, reasonable calculation the accumulating fund will win this comparison, but you're welcome to run your own simulation.

In an unbiased comparison (if you read the link), the investor may choose to manually reinvest the dividends for the distributing version so there is no lost yield for the distributing as the time in market for both versions will be the same.

If the holdings have grown to a sufficient size (in either accumulation or drawdown phases) over a given time horizon, there is a possibility the dividends alone will be sufficient for the drawdown without any need to incur brokerage fees for the distributing version.
 

Rknight

Master Member
Joined
May 11, 2005
Messages
3,173
Reaction score
36
I had this exact same problem! I could convert through TWS but not through the app. Fortunately it's back to normal now on my app, you probably just need to give it a while.

Strange, now i can see the USD currency to convert to.
But i get the error message "insufficient data to place the order" :(
 

psyfy

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2002
Messages
76
Reaction score
2
How much warchest did you unload?
Don't have much unfortunately so I only spend a bit. But keeping a bit more to see if in a months time it's lower than deploy warchest again. Don't think we need to be too greedy just a bit more than usual DCA to take advantage is better than nothing.
 

hwckhs

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
1,347
In an unbiased comparison (if you read the link), the investor may choose to manually reinvest the dividends for the distributing version so there is no lost yield for the distributing as the time in market for both versions will be the same.

The comparison was done by ignoring trading costs. Once you consider trading costs, the distributing fund will fare very slightly lower, as the page states:

An investor who always reinvests dividend income gains a modest but clear advantage from accumulating ETFs, because they avoid the trading cost of reinvesting.

If the holdings have grown to a sufficient size (in either accumulation or drawdown phases) over a given time horizon, there is a possibility the dividends alone will be sufficient for the drawdown without any need to incur brokerage fees for the distributing version.

That's true. If you retire with a $1m portfolio. Assuming a 2% dividend yield for the portfolio, you will get on average $1,667 per month, which is a good sum to sustain one's lifestyle.

Another aspect that is not often mentioned is that dividend distribution is less volatile than price. During a market downturn, one can continue to live on dividends if the portfolio is large. Even with a small portfolio, you can view the dividend as consolation. This motivates the investor to continue holding and investing, and to wait for price to recover. An accumulating fund does not lose dividends, but there is no visibility to dividends unless one digs into the annual report.

I think investors have a choice:
  • If you hate seeing spare cash from dividends and having to reinvest them, or want to squeeze every bit of return, choose accumulating.
  • If you value income and are willing to pay the (small) cost of reinvesting dividends, choose distributing.
 
Last edited:

NeneNene

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2020
Messages
51
Reaction score
50
I had this exact same problem! I could convert through TWS but not through the app. Fortunately it's back to normal now on my app, you probably just need to give it a while.

Had the same issue and spoke to customer support. They asked me to use the following on web..
Press Trade button > search symbol ÜSD.SGD > Key in USD needed >Buy.

It worked !
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,557
Reaction score
5,575
The comparison was done by ignoring trading costs. Once you consider trading costs, the distributing fund will fare very slightly lower, as the page states:

An investor who always reinvests dividend income gains a modest but clear advantage from accumulating ETFs, because they avoid the trading cost of reinvesting.
I suspect Shiny Things and I -- who are generally on the same wavelength -- have in mind that, unfortunately, most people don't save doggedly and invest prudently every month for 30+ years. Unfortunately most people have lapses. For example, they lose a job (and in a recession when stock markets might be cheaper), suspend their buys for some months, and thus lose some long-term returns and wealth accumulation. Or maybe they just forget to log on and make their buy(s). An accumulating fund helps mitigate those hiccups to a certain extent.

I'm a little bit spoiled with the U.S. markets and funds I must play in since all U.S. funds distribute dividends, but the brokers and custodians -- especially for U.S. mutual funds -- provide the option to reinvest distributed dividends automatically. So I tick that checkbox, and that's that. If at some point in the future I would like dividends distributed, no problem, I can uncheck that checkbox. But if I had to pick one or the other I'd definitely pick accumulating (automatic reinvestment).
 
Last edited:

pai000000

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
366
Reaction score
66
No, if you are a Singapore resident who is not a resident of any other country, then there is no WHT for dividends of WQDV.

I have never been charged any tax for dividends of my VWRD, as you can see below. It says "Exempt From Withholding".

BLVUcl8.png


Taxation is a complex subject, especially when the asset is global, and domiciled in a country you are not a resident of. There are multiple layers of taxes. The fund manager may need to pay for WHT for US stocks (the 15%) and to other countries as well. Once the dividend land on your hands, it may be subject to further taxes depending on your residency. If you are a Singapore resident, then no tax on your dividend as I have shown above. I think the iShares rep misunderstood you as someone who resides in Ireland or Europe etc, where dividend or capital gain tax may apply.

Annual Report 2019 - https://www.ishares.com/uk/individu...port/ishares-ii-plc-2019-en-annual-report.pdf

Check page 64. iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (WQDV) had an income (I assume mostly dividends) of $1.654m, and fund manager paid taxes of $201k. That's about 12% of dividends they received. This ETF has about 54% of holdings in US stocks. Fund manager will pay 15% to US IRA, and similar/other taxes to other countries which may have higher, lower or no tax. iShares declares dividend after deducting this tax expenses. That's why I say the dividend is net of WHT.

Let's check a pure US ETF, shall we? Check page 63 - iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (QDIV). Tax of $1.862m on $13.145m income = 14.17% which is very close to the 15% WHT payable to US IRA. I see that iShares participates in securities lending. That is probably the reason some of the income may not be taxable, and why we don't see a perfect 15% here.

If you want to better understand taxation matters, I refer you to iShares Prospectus - https://www.ishares.com/uk/individual/en/literature/prospectus/ishare-ii-plc-en-emea-prospectus.pdf page 134-145. That will clear up a lot of confusions.

Thanks for the information. I did mention via email that I was Singaporean. But perhaps he could have made a mistake. I hope you are right haha
Anyway will know for sure when I get the first distribution.
 

moolala

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Messages
12,241
Reaction score
948
I suspect Shiny Things and I -- who are generally on the same wavelength -- have in mind that, unfortunately, most people don't save doggedly and invest prudently every month for 30+ years. Unfortunately most people have lapses. For example, they lose a job (and in a recession when stock markets might be cheaper), suspend their buys for some months, and thus lose some long-term returns and wealth accumulation. Or maybe they just forget to log on and make their buy(s). An accumulating fund helps mitigate those hiccups to a certain extent.

I'm a little bit spoiled with the U.S. markets and funds I must play in since all U.S. funds distribute dividends, but the brokers and custodians -- especially for U.S. mutual funds -- provide the option to reinvest distributed dividends automatically. So I tick that checkbox, and that's that. If at some point in the future I would like dividends distributed, no problem, I can uncheck that checkbox. But if I had to pick one or the other I'd definitely pick accumulating (automatic reinvestment).

If you check the option to reinvest dividend, it will still be after the 30% tax is taken right?

I.E. no tax advantage for checking that option, only for convenience
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,557
Reaction score
5,575
If you check the option to reinvest dividend, it will still be after the 30% tax is taken right?
Tax compliant U.S. persons don't have any dividend taxes withheld on U.S. securities. We pay U.S. dividend tax rates that are almost always substantially lower than 30% (sometimes as low as zero), and we pay somewhat in arrears (basically on a quarterly basis). Yes, it's a substantial advantage that my gross (pre-tax) dividends are automatically reinvested. I then pay cash a bit later to settle the tax.
 

Helicopter

Banned
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
looks like cant congratulate you today :(
was hoping to see the win

Don't worry it will get there. It is just trending down slowly.

Be patient, I have waited so long what is another few days of wait?

Awaiting your well wishes soon!:s13:
 

moolala

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Messages
12,241
Reaction score
948
Tax compliant U.S. persons don't have any dividend taxes withheld on U.S. securities. We pay U.S. dividend tax rates that are almost always substantially lower than 30% (sometimes as low as zero), and we pay somewhat in arrears (basically on a quarterly basis). Yes, it's a substantial advantage that my gross (pre-tax) dividends are automatically reinvested. I then pay cash a bit later to settle the tax.

but for singaporeans, checking this option doesn't have any tax advantage other than convenience right?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,557
Reaction score
5,575
but for singaporeans, checking this option doesn't have any tax advantage other than convenience right?
"Singaporeans" is not the correct term here. There are Singaporeans who are U.S. persons, and there are Singaporeans who live in tax jurisdictions that have a higher dividend tax rate than the U.S. dividend tax rate. These Singaporeans (and non-Singaporeans) also can enjoy some tax benefits with automatic dividend reinvesting.

Individuals residing in Singapore who are not tax residents of any other jurisdiction do not enjoy a tax advantage from this particular automatic dividend reinvesting.
 

revhappy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
12,208
Reaction score
2,669
MBH spread is so wide now 1.039 : 1.048.

I'm times of crisis only sovereign bonds are safe.
 

flowerpalms

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
58,138
Reaction score
18,746
That is why MBH is important for ur portfolio.

As IWDA continues to dip, please be reminded not to rush in and buy buy buy just because the price going down. Be disciplined, stick to monthly Dca and also don't panic sell

MBH spread is so wide now 1.039 : 1.048.

I'm times of crisis only sovereign bonds are safe.
 

hwckhs

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
1,347
MBH spread is so wide now 1.039 : 1.048.

I'm times of crisis only sovereign bonds are safe.

As I type this, bid/ask is as follows:
  • A35: 1.224/1.230 (0.006 or 0.49%)
  • MBH: 1.039/1.045 (0.006 or 0.58%)

The spread of A35 is only slightly better than that of MBH. Not sure how you relate spread to "safe".

If you are referring to price increase, both A35 and MBH increased in price recently. By looking at charts, the increase in A35 seems to be a bit more than that of MBH, but not by much.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top