Example: Stock is $5 now. I want the system to sell it if it reaches $2. If i put a sell limit at $2, someone who bids at $3 would fill my order. And I don't want that, I want it sold ONLY if price reaches $2.
How can I do this, please? Or does SC simply not offer stop losses?
What you’re describing there could be either a “stop-limit” order, or a “Stop-market” order (which is also known as just a stop loss order). The difference is what happens when the stock reaches $2.
With a stop-limit order, you’ll specify a “stop price” and a “limit price”. In this case, your “stop price” will be $2, and your “limit price” might be, say, $1.95. When the price drops to $2, your stop-limit order will turn into an active limit order that says “sell my stock, but no lower than $1.95”.
With a stop-market order, you’ll just specify a “stop price” (in this case, again, $2). When the price drops to $2, your stop-market order will turn into an active market order that says “sell my stock AT ANY PRICE I DON’T CARE EVEN IF THAT PRICE IS MINUS THIRTY SEVEN DOLLARS JUST GET ME OUT”.
And that’s probably not what you actually meant to say. Which is why you use stop-limit orders instead of stop-market (aka stop-loss) orders.
Personally, as a lurking sponge that's just trying to soak up diversified knowledge, I see people like chrisloh as contrarians that test the robustness of the popular views in here, and prod the gurus to provide more illuminating insights. Just that his attitude sucks.
Thanks mate, and I appreciate the kind words. I don’t mind being disagreed with, and I’m always open to hearing from people who think I’m wrong about stuff. My problems with Chrisloh65 are twofold, though.
Firstly, he is just deeply deeply unpleasant. There are new investors on this thread, who come here to ask questions and learn and take their first steps toward learning good investing habits. And if they see people fighting in this thread, it’s going to scare them off. I’m here to teach, not to fight.
Secondly, whenever he talks about markets stuff, he seems to be aggressively and enthusiastically wrong about basically everything. Stuff like how synthetic ETFs work, or what direction the yen went back in the nineties... stuff that you can find with a quick google if you’re so inclined. He spreads bad information to such a degree that you can’t leave it alone, otherwise people will stumble across it and think it’s good information.
Can sack ho ching and temasek and just invest index funds? Our cpf monies will be better?
I
have made fun of Temasek in the past for their truly atrocious run from 2007 to about 2012, when they trod on literally every equity landmine imaginable, from buying Merrills at the highs in ‘07 and capitulating at the lows in ‘09, to being long a bunch of Sino-Forest when that particular scam exploded...
Switch to decaf.