if we r talking about the mass in general, that’s basically the intention of moe to at least push most students to achieve tertiary education (poly) at least. But of coz most kiasu parents will think their kids can perform like Lambo and thus, start making early preparation for their kids to enter the best primary school. But the qns is, how many kids can perform like Lambo? Both my niece are enrolled in popular pri schools but in the end they also end up in normal sec schools.
The whole idea of full SBB is to let students learn at their own pace (esp subjects they r good at) and creating multiple pathways to cater to the different strengths and interests of sec students. Eg some NA students may be weak in language subjects but strong in math, so they can take O level math and increase their chance to poly as the grade conversion from O to NA will give them the advantage. That’s y some NA students when reach sec 4 can use their N level results to apply for poly foundation programme, whether they can go Uni really depends on how they perform in poly. Whereas for Exp students, more and more also began to take the poly route (not becoz they can’t qualify for JC) but because poly admission to uni vacancy has increased. Unlike in the past, poly to uni only accept top 5% COM holder in poly.
So if u r an average performer and want to play safe, u go poly still get a diploma. If u go JC and u flunked, u only get A level cert which is as good as O level cert. thus, Not many express students want to take that risk, Last time was different, the usual route to uni is JC. So if I want to target uni, I have to work very hard in sec school to get into JC before I stand a chance to get into uni. Now is different, poly admission to uni is getting more common.
That said, I see this system benefitted mostly the NA, and partly the Exp students, not so much for NT students coz their route is still ITE. But heard ite also trying to slowly do away with Nitec courses and offer 3 year higher Nitec instead.