Proposal Ring - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

dearmisterj

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Bought from JP last weekend. 3rd private jeweller shop I visited but the extensive education from Casey impressed me enough to know that the diamonds I will receive will be professionally explained to me so I thoroughly understand what I am buying. As the crowd was not too bad, he offered to walk me out in the street in various lightings to see how the diamond I chose would performed respectively. It was superbly awesome service so I know what I will expect from the fire,scintillation and sparkle of diamond other than the pretence of lighting display in these jewellery shops.

Nonetheless, help me to evaluate if this is a good and worthy buy for $3850, much appreciated! This is an ideal cut by the way.

GIA Report Details
Weight: 0.60 carat
Color Grade: E
Clarity Grade: VS2
Shape and Cutting Style: Round Brilliant
Cut Grade: Excellent
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescene: None
Clarity Characteristics: Crystal, Feather

Holloway Cut Adviser
Total Visal Performance Rating: 1.2 - Excellent

Actual_0_60_E_VS2_GIA_1172542376.jpg


Aset_0_60_E_VS2_GIA_1172542376.jpg


Ideal_0_60_E_VS2_GIA_1172542376.jpg


Hearts_0_60_E_VS2_GIA_1172542376.jpg

this is an ideal cut right? can see some areas of weaker light returns as well as the hearts and arrows not being very symmetrical. that being said, I would think for the price it should be quite a good buy considering the hca of 1.2 and decent arrows and contrast.. most probably wouldnt vary significantly from a super ideal to the naked eye ;)
 

coolhead

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
52,474
Reaction score
13,599
this is an ideal cut right? can see some areas of weaker light returns as well as the hearts and arrows not being very symmetrical. that being said, I would think for the price it should be quite a good buy considering the hca of 1.2 and decent arrows and contrast.. most probably wouldnt vary significantly from a super ideal to the naked eye ;)

yep, it's an ideal cut. Maybe mine is an untrained eye as I couldn't tell the difference from super ideal when the comparison was made. U r right that the hearts and arrows are not very symmetrical, as pointed out by JP and hence, this was delegated to ideal cut.

Can I say that the hearts and arrows are the precision of the cut to delineate the contrast?
 

dearmisterj

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
yep, it's an ideal cut. Maybe mine is an untrained eye as I couldn't tell the difference from super ideal when the comparison was made. U r right that the hearts and arrows are not very symmetrical, as pointed out by JP and hence, this was delegated to ideal cut.

Can I say that the hearts and arrows are the precision of the cut to delineate the contrast?

i believe its something like that.. to give the fire and scintillation some eveness when they sparkle.. but unless you're looking so closely at the diamond, I doubt it will make much difference hahaha
 

Lavendar520

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Finally second visit JP..already place deposit for Super Idea Cut 0.62 F VVS2..
Can experts here help to see or any comment on scope image below?

Due sufficient post count..who can help me upload Images links below:
Thanks :)

h t t p://
s1248.photobucket.com/user/lavendar520/media/Actual%200.62%20F%20VVS2%20GIA%202171638065_zpsnafdgxlj.jpg.html

s1248.photobucket.com/user/lavendar520/media/Actual%200.62%20F%20VVS2%20GIA%202171638065_zpsnafdgxlj.jpg.html

s1248.photobucket.com/user/lavendar520/media/Actual%200.62%20F%20VVS2%20GIA%202171638065_zpsnafdgxlj.jpg.html

s1248.photobucket.com/user/lavendar520/media/Actual%200.62%20F%20VVS2%20GIA%202171638065_zpsnafdgxlj.jpg.html

s1248.photobucket.com/user/lavendar520/media/Actual%200.62%20F%20VVS2%20GIA%202171638065_zpsnafdgxlj.jpg.html

Can help to see above scope image, diamond ok or not?
Thanks :)
 

coolhead

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
52,474
Reaction score
13,599
i believe its something like that.. to give the fire and scintillation some eveness when they sparkle.. but unless you're looking so closely at the diamond, I doubt it will make much difference hahaha

Wow sounds good! I wouldn't mind if its relegated to ideal cut becoz of slight uneveness of hearts and arrows, as long as the fire and scintillation are there. If ideal cut becoz of fire and scintillation, then I will totally mind lol. Ok, 0.6 carat for ideal at 3,850 is a good buy for me!
 

dearmisterj

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
can't decide between the brellia and solitaire! both are so pretty.

They are quite different diamonds in my opinion, have you looked at photos where the diamonds are worn on the fingers? Its a matter of personal preference but my girlfriend prefers round cuts, more classic look. The Brellia gives me a more vintage feel, and will look good with a halo setting imo
 

dearmisterj

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Hi dearmister
I personally prefer brellia, but based on the two diamonds specs, I'm not sure which is better. Any advice?

Are you referring to this two? You can refer to specs, but at the end of the day the most important is still how it looks to you. If you prefer the Brellia and you think the flaws are not acceptable, how about checking with JP if they have another Brellia of a better clarity, albeit a little smaller? You can't really compare a Brellia with the round brilliant since the way it is cut is different, and so is the scintillation and fire.. Personally I wouldn't choose a diamond cut that I like less as compared to one I like more just because the specs look better. My two cents :s12:







 

Alwaysthatshort

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Are you referring to this two? You can refer to specs, but at the end of the day the most important is still how it looks to you. If you prefer the Brellia and you think the flaws are not acceptable, how about checking with JP if they have another Brellia of a better clarity, albeit a little smaller? You can't really compare a Brellia with the round brilliant since the way it is cut is different, and so is the scintillation and fire.. Personally I wouldn't choose a diamond cut that I like less as compared to one I like more just because the specs look better. My two cents :s12:

Thanks dearmister, I guess I shall take a closer look at the brellia again once the wax model is done. As from the scope seems like there's quite a bit of light leakage. Correct me if I'm wrong
 

dearmisterj

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Are you referring to this two? You can refer to specs, but at the end of the day the most important is still how it looks to you. If you prefer the Brellia and you think the flaws are not acceptable, how about checking with JP if they have another Brellia of a better clarity, albeit a little smaller? You can't really compare a Brellia with the round brilliant since the way it is cut is different, and so is the scintillation and fire.. Personally I wouldn't choose a diamond cut that I like less as compared to one I like more just because the specs look better. My two cents :s12:

Thanks dearmister, I guess I shall take a closer look at the brellia again once the wax model is done. As from the scope seems like there's quite a bit of light leakage. Correct me if I'm wrong

personally i dont see any problems with either scopes, both look to have ideal light returns.. light leakage is indicated by white areas, and both diamonds are bound to have a little around the edges ( you can see these with all the previous users' scopes too).. what i mean is that if you feel that the flaws ( i.e the cloud, feather, crystal incursions) are too visible for your preference, you may want to select another brellia of higher clarity. does the brellia diamond look less shiny to the naked eye? anw i dont think the wax model has anything to do with the diamond performance it is purely to show you an example of the setting.
 

fir3bon3

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Thanks for the help! Haha.. Is there anything else I should look for in the diamond?

Nth much alrdy. These scopes are use to analyze light performance and symmetry of the diamond.
They look good so there shouldn't be any worries.
Color and Clarity maybe? That's more like personal preference.

You decided on your ring design?
 

fir3bon3

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Personally I do prefer the brellia cut. But I'm just worried that on the specs. Like it will not be sparkly. I saw some crystal, cloud and needle on the report and it look pretty much. Does it affect the appearance of the diamond?

personally i dont see any problems with either scopes, both look to have ideal light returns.. light leakage is indicated by white areas, and both diamonds are bound to have a little around the edges ( you can see these with all the previous users' scopes too).. what i mean is that if you feel that the flaws ( i.e the cloud, feather, crystal incursions) are too visible for your preference, you may want to select another brellia of higher clarity. does the brellia diamond look less shiny to the naked eye? anw i dont think the wax model has anything to do with the diamond performance it is purely to show you an example of the setting.

Agree with bro dearmisterj;

Scopes
Light return ✓
Hearts ✓
inclusions are normal (unless you're going for Internally Flawless or Flawless diamond) furthermore they won't be visible to the naked eye.

Go for the Brellia if you like that. I don't see any reason the inclusion should affect your decision. But still decision lies with you! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top