Because it's a varying return policy. Can't expect a policy that has big upside to also guaranteed a minimum 3% in a low interest rate environment.
cannot even guarantee 2% aka ssb?


Because it's a varying return policy. Can't expect a policy that has big upside to also guaranteed a minimum 3% in a low interest rate environment.

Only your 2nd point make sense. 1 and 4 are just not legit points.
3rd point is reasonable.
I think to simplify the process, we can use this table for illustration
![]()
Credits to mrclubbie
Take note CAGR is badly affected because of loss compounding, Year 1 is a bad year for all insurers.
Pru's brochure
![]()
2015 0.2%
2016 8.3%
Par fund is above 4.75% for the past 10 years. Not sure about 20.
I think to simplify the process, we can use this table for illustration
![]()
Credits to mrclubbie
Take note CAGR is badly affected because of loss compounding, Year 1 is a bad year for all insurers.
Pru's brochure
![]()
2015 0.2%
2016 8.3%
Par fund is above 4.75% for the past 10 years. Not sure about 20.
They used this for limited pay whole life as well?
Erm, are those the average for all endowment plans or all endowment plans pay out as above?
Why no 20 year stats? It's simple stats.
Erm, are those the average for all endowment plans or all endowment plans pay out as above?
Why no 20 year stats? It's simple stats.

Erm, are those the average for all endowment plans or all endowment plans pay out as above?
Why no 20 year stats? It's simple stats.
I think you are looking at the wrong image. 20 years data here.
Do take note for SSB to be comparable with endowment, you have to combine it with term.
![]()
The term part, I'm not sure about that. Endowment ain't sold as a protection policy, it's just a bonus. Main function is savings/wealth accumulation?
Are we gonna add that in just so SSB can provide a bonus too? That's missing the main objective no?
Anyway, the image above is a tad blurred. Not sure if that is the average or absolute return of all endowment policies?
Like I mentioned before, I wanna know the absolute returns stats(not par fund performance) of all endowment policies. Is it more than 70% of all endowment policies returns above 2% over 20 year?
Failing which, can we deduct par fund performance fees and get a stats of how many endowment policies can perform above 2% over 20 years?
Failing which, can we get stats from specific companies' all endowment policies stats that performed above 2% over 20 years?
Nope...what you are seeing is the actual yield already. In that table.
Means people already surrendered that policy.
I think it is fair enough for that agent to produce only prudential products return since he is prudential agent himself. I will just use that set of data to do a comparison. Perhaps just take lower of the 2 actual yield to compare.