DestinyDreamer
Master Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2010
- Messages
- 4,374
- Reaction score
- 2
I do not understand the waiting game sometimes. There is always something that will be better than what you will wait for. Say tomorrow AMD releases the 3000 series only to be met with a counter by Intel a few months down the road decimating the 3000 series. I say just buy what is available now. CPU's are hardly a bottleneck for gaming unless you are playing in 1080p. At 1440p or greater, you are not going to notice anything substantial at all. Invest in a competent GPU instead of waiting for the latest and the best. You stand to save some $$$.
Most CPU's for the last few iterations only offered minor performance changes especially Intel; looking strictly from the IPC perspective. And for gaming, I think 6-8 cores will last a while. After moving to the 9700k, I realized that hyperthreading or SMT as what some of you might come to know of it, really offers minor performance improvements for the majority of game titles. If you look strictly from the gaming standpoint and seen reviews, the 9700k has outperformed ever so slightly the more expensive and hotter 9900k across majority of the game titles and running cooler. 5Ghz pretty much is a piece of cake on the 9600k/9700k. 9900k is a nightmare even with a slight overclock where you hit the thermal wall almost instantly. Physical Cores > Thread Cores.
I would also rather invest in a proven platform like the Z390 / AM4 platform as this has been out for a while and you will not have to bother much with stuff like RAM incompatibilities and so forth. The upcoming AMD and Intel CPU's and it's respective platforms would have isolated issues on their own at launch and that may detract your computing experience which is why sometimes newer is not always the best.
Just my 2c...
I mostly agree with what you said except for the highlighted portion. You obviously have no issues on budget since you bought a top of the line model of 2080 ti. Ordinary folks wanna get the best value for what they paid for. We all know what happened during the release of GTX 10 series card. The leap in performance
And for as CPU not being a bottleneck.... that would be true if you are talking about the past. Last time, 4 cores/ 4 threads was deemed more than enough for gaming. Forward to the present. You would see the same cpu peaking at 100% utilization vs an i5 9600k when playing BF V, resulting on huge fps dips on 1440p. And we are talking about the present only. Only god knows how much is deemed sufficient when you play AAA games 3 years down the road.
I'm not saying u should spend too much on CPU. But I'm saying AMD upcoming release, offers the solution (more physical cores, higher clock speeds) at an insane low price.
If money is not a factor, I would agree with you, completely.
Last edited:
