Redmi Note 8

[Pocoyoz]

How come sg pricing cheaper than my?

Sent from Amazon using GAGT

 

[Ultimo_Urien]

$369 quite expensive for SD665

 

[Broadwalk]

$369 quite expensive for SD665

369 for Pro. You read wrongly.

 

[Audiology93]

$369 quite expensive for SD665

$369 is for note 8 pro, which is using Helio G90T. The 665 in redmi note 8 only cost RRP $269.

Sent from LG G7 ThinQ using GAGT

 

[davidwong]

 

[PeasantBeing]

$369 is for note 8 pro, which is using Helio G90T. The 665 in redmi note 8 only cost RRP $269.

Sent from LG G7 ThinQ using GAGT

RRP $269 for 4/64 set is $60 cheap er than previously which is $329 for 4/64 Note 7/6/5.

Sent from REDMI NOTE 5 on Rocket Uno with TPG Booster using GAGT

 

[Charlie_Zhan]

RRP $269 for 4/64 set is $60 cheap er than previously which is $329 for 4/64 Note 7/6/5.

Sent from REDMI NOTE 5 on Rocket Uno with TPG Booster using GAGT

because of the better performing SoC on the note7

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT

 

[Broadwalk]

I am very tempted to get it from local xiaomi store.

 

[NightRaven49]

because of the better performing SoC on the note7

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT

the difference in performance between the 660 and 665 is negligible as they are effectively the same soc. if anything, the 665 should be more power efficient for the same performance. hopefully its cos xm sg realised that they cannot markup prices so much anymore.

 

[camotorpedo]

Waiting for the official Note 8 128GB from official Mi store on Lazada or Shoppee

 

[Broadwalk]

I went to Jem Xiaomi store and check..o the 4/64gb Redmi note 8 is 269. Pro will only come next month.

 

[PeasantBeing]

because of the better performing SoC on the note7

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT

Not only Note 7. Note 5 and Note 6 also this price.

Sent from REDMI NOTE 5 on Rocket Uno with TPG Booster using GAGT

 

[PeasantBeing]

the difference in performance between the 660 and 665 is negligible as they are effectively the same soc. if anything, the 665 should be more power efficient for the same performance. hopefully its cos xm sg realised that they cannot markup prices so much anymore.

Last time the Mi Official Stores were run by 2 different companies. Now I think all under the same company (the same one which runs the Malaysia Mi Official Stores). So I think they put the Sg prices almost the same as the Msia prices.

Sent from REDMI NOTE 5 on Rocket Uno with TPG Booster using GAGT

 

[Ultimo_Urien]

Pro using P90 mediatek??? Same as Oppo Reno Z.?

 

[Pocoyoz]

Pro using P90 mediatek??? Same as Oppo Reno Z.?

G90T .....

 

[Ultimo_Urien]

G90T .....

Wow the G90T rike sibeh hot stuff, can whack most midrange Androids to stone age.

 

[AcquiT]

Wow the G90T rike sibeh hot stuff, can whack most midrange Androids to stone age.

Designed for gaming

I played COD ,my hp not warm
Not bad

 

[Charlie_Zhan]

the difference in performance between the 660 and 665 is negligible as they are effectively the same soc. if anything, the 665 should be more power efficient for the same performance. hopefully its cos xm sg realised that they cannot markup prices so much anymore.

more power efficient, yes I agree. 11nm vs 14nm.
665 has better ISP and DSP processing, yes it's true.

but same CPU performance? not necessarily. numbers speaks for themselves.

furthermore, 665 only supports up to QC3.0 while 660 is QC4.0.
660 supports up WQHD+ display while 665 only up to FHD+.

but calling these two effective the same SoCs is far, far from being factual.

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT

 

[Audiology93]

It’s similar to the 845 in benchmarks. Pretty impressive.

Wow the G90T rike sibeh hot stuff, can whack most midrange Androids to stone age.

Posted with iPad Pro 12.9 HardwareZone Forums app

 

[Audiology93]

I’ll gladly take 11nm for the efficiency rather than 14nm just for 10% improvement in performance
But yea 665 is inferior in terms of performance when it comes to benchmark scores.

more power efficient, yes I agree. 11nm vs 14nm.
665 has better ISP and DSP processing, yes it's true.

but same CPU performance? not necessarily. numbers speaks for themselves.

furthermore, 665 only supports up to QC3.0 while 660 is QC4.0.
660 supports up WQHD+ display while 665 only up to FHD+.

but calling these two effective the same SoCs is far, far from being factual.

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT

Posted with iPad Pro 12.9 HardwareZone Forums app