Share your shots here!

qingtian

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
1
Thanks. :)

Test shots with a cheap entry level DSLR + ND110 (finally bought)

Sunrise #2 by kengoh8888, on Flickr


Singapore Chinese Garden #7 by kengoh8888, on Flickr


View my flickriver
The shots are good. =)

Anyway adding further to your statement, is never a matter whether the gear one are using is cheaper... Is only a matter of whether the owner know how to use it and how much "power" one want from the camera. End of the days is all about preferences and expectation and how much one know how to use it. :s13:
 

FD Trinitron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
11,244
Reaction score
9,663
The shots are good. =)

Anyway adding further to your statement, is never a matter whether the gear one are using is cheaper... Is only a matter of whether the owner know how to use it and how much "power" one want from the camera. End of the days is all about preferences and expectation and how much one know how to use it. :s13:

Thanks for the nice comments. :)
Yeah no complian on this cam for landscape other than I miss the iso 80 for 1/3 stop longer exposure. The high iso performance is not as good as my the other cam but not an issue for lanscape shots. :D

However for birding it really lose out on features.
It doesn't have my fav TAv setting, changing settings is not str8 fwd as those buttons found in my the other cam.
The shuttle sound is much louder which is not good for birding use. it also lacks the top LCD screen for useful info.
The resolution is much lower, 25% lower (only 12Mp) & this is an disadvantage for shooting smaller birds from a far distance.
I got much lesser keeper shots shooting brids yesterday. :(
But for less than 1/2 the price it's good for other photography.
So I only get this cam for landscape & less birding. Once my cam back from service will probably sell it off. :s13:
 

jacobs

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
530
Reaction score
0
6276243055_bdd3e28004_b.jpg
 
Last edited:

tecnica

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
100,583
Reaction score
0
The shots are good. =)

Anyway adding further to your statement, is never a matter whether the gear one are using is cheaper... Is only a matter of whether the owner know how to use it and how much "power" one want from the camera. End of the days is all about preferences and expectation and how much one know how to use it. :s13:
akg, long time no see you. :(
 

qingtian

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
1
Thanks for the nice comments. :)
Yeah no complian on this cam for landscape other than I miss the iso 80 for 1/3 stop longer exposure. The high iso performance is not as good as my the other cam but not an issue for lanscape shots. :D

However for birding it really lose out on features.
It doesn't have my fav TAv setting, changing settings is not str8 fwd as those buttons found in my the other cam.
The shuttle sound is much louder which is not good for birding use. it also lacks the top LCD screen for useful info.
The resolution is much lower, 25% lower (only 12Mp) & this is an disadvantage for shooting smaller birds from a far distance.
I got much lesser keeper shots shooting brids yesterday. :(
But for less than 1/2 the price it's good for other photography.
So I only get this cam for landscape & less birding. Once my cam back from service will probably sell it off. :s13:
What happen to your cam?
 

FD Trinitron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
11,244
Reaction score
9,663
IMG_4569_70_71_tonemapped-.jpg


ya la, around the same area~

I hate this place.
I got to come in from Punggol East/Central, walk all the way & thru' this bridge with my gears of almost 10kg to the birding location. Think the walking distance is >1km. :eek:
 

tecnica

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
100,583
Reaction score
0
I hate this place.
I got to come in from Punggol East/Central, walk all the way & thru' this bridge with my gears of almost 10kg to the birding location. Think the walking distance is >1km. :eek:
damn! the walking distance is :eek:, i walk until the bridge, thought can cross over and walk to punggol beach side but the other side not yet done! i got to walk all the way back to LRT station and take a bus to punggol beach. :(
 

FD Trinitron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
11,244
Reaction score
9,663
damn! the walking distance is :eek:, i walk until the bridge, thought can cross over and walk to punggol beach side but the other side not yet done! i got to walk all the way back to LRT station and take a bus to punggol beach. :(

lol you also feel so. :s13:
That's why I try not to go there and becos of this I missed some nice migratory birds. :(
 

tecnica

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
100,583
Reaction score
0
lol you also feel so. :s13:
That's why I try not to go there and becos of this I missed some nice migratory birds. :(

yeah man but now the area complete liao, maybe go look see again. :o

Where is this place?
I like the sky/sun and the color tones.

thanks man :)

it's at pinnacle @ duxton. :o

i especially like the couple at the far end~
 

FD Trinitron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
11,244
Reaction score
9,663
yeah man but now the area complete liao, maybe go look see again. :o



thanks man :)

it's at pinnacle @ duxton. :o

i especially like the couple at the far end~

Thanks, this is a good place for sunset shooting, but I've never been there. :o
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top