SingPost *Official* (SGX: S08)

Obama486

Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2015
Messages
2,268
Reaction score
0
Think starhub book value per share is $0.10 or something like that.

yup

M1 and Starhub not much assets one... the telco assets are owned by garmen, they only bid and pay $$$ to get the licenses to operate it

Singtel the book value higher because their foreign stakes are market to market (the market price of the overseas telco stocks)

starhub book value much lower than M1, also because of their acquisition of SCV (singapore cable vision) over a decade ago... the assets and goodwill already depreciated till zero, but its still providing cash flow
 

focus1974

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
91,033
Reaction score
32,696
maybe not all stocks should see price to book ba

for reits of course must see

but for tech or service companies

example SGX, Silverlake, Telcos and ARA... doesn't make sense to use book value

I think same applies for Singpost

however PE wise, I feel its on the high side

Replacement cost is not Book Value..
replacement cost is the cost to start a similar business of similar scale..
 

a1v1n_

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
54
NmrVAh7l.jpg


Alibaba ploughs further S$279m in SingPost, invest in e-commerce unit

Sent from ME using GAGT
 

a1v1n_

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
26,122
Reaction score
54
SINGAPORE: Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding is investing about S$279 million (US$205.98 million) to expand its holdings in Singapore Post Ltd (SingPost) and its e-commerce subsidiary, the two companies said in a statement.

SingPost is seeking to boost its e-commerce business to offset weak postal revenues, and last year an Alibaba unit bought a stake of more than 10 per cent in SingPost for US$249 million.

In the latest deal, Alibaba said it was buying an additional 5 per cent stake in SingPost for S$187.1 million.

Alibaba will also invest up to S$92 million to buy a 34 per cent stake in Quantium Solutions International, a SingPost subsidiary that provides e-commerce logistics across the Asia Pacific.

Alibaba is currently the second largest shareholder in SingPost after Singapore Telecommunications.

SingPost shares were up 1.32 per cent in early trade after the announcement, outperforming a largely flat market.

(Reporting by Saeed Azhar; Editing by Miral Fahmy)

- Reuters

Sent from ME using GAGT
 

Minx99

Master Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
SingPost is now flushed with cash. Let's see if management can use it wisely to increase EPS.
I don't quite agree with CNA's use of the word plough to describe Alipapa's investment in Singpost. I think they should say Ali nibble small small into Singpost as it's small change for them. :s22:
 

Perisher

Greater Supremacy Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
84,162
Reaction score
10,088
I don't quite agree with CNA's use of the word plough to describe Alipapa's investment in Singpost. I think they should say Ali nibble small small into Singpost as it's small change for them. :s22:

You would fail as a news reporter in this time and age then.
Sensationalise any and every news.
 

athulican

Master Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
2,645
Reaction score
98
Can Singapore Post Limited Be A Winning Stock?

Can Singapore Post Limited Be A Winning Stock?

By Hui Leong Chin - July 15, 2015

Source: http://www.fool.sg/2015/07/15/can-singapore-post-limited-be-a-winning-stock/

At the Motley Fool, we favor businesses with superior operations as they are the ones that can deliver long term returns for investors.

To figure out how well a business is run, we can look into a company’s return on equity (ROE). The ROE is a measure of how much profit a company generates for every shareholder dollar used in the business.

While the ROE is a good measure in itself, we can go a step further to gain even more insights. Breaking the ROE down into three other ratios may help us see how well a company is actually being managed.

Breaking up the ROE

In particular, we are looking to break down the ROE into three metrics, namely the return on sales, return on assets, and financial leverage.

ROE return on equity

With reference to the equation above, the first ratio (net income divided by sales) can be referred to as the return on sales or net margin, the second ratio (sales divided by assets) is the return on assets or asset turnover, and the third (assets divided by equity) is financial leverage.

For a succinct description of the individual elements, I turn to a passage from author and analyst Dennis Jean-Jacques’s book 5 Keys to Value Investing:

“Return on sales (ROS) indicates the amount of profits a company is able to keep for each dollar that the company takes in from the sale of goods and services. Asset turnover show the amount of revenues the company is able to generate for each dollar of assets committed. Financial leverage shows investors how many dollars of assets the firm can use for every dollar of equity.”

Putting Singapore Post to the test

Let’s run mail and logistics company Singapore Post Limited (SGX: S08) through this exercise today. In the chart below, you can see how the three components of Singapore Post’s ROE have changed over its past five fiscal years:

image-110.png


Source: Morningstar

What’s really obvious here is that Singapore Post’s ROE (blue bars) has fallen significantly over the period under study, moving from more than 50% in the financial year ended 31 March 2011 (FY2010/11) to 14.6% in FY2014/15.

There are two main drivers for the decline in Singapore Post’s ROE with one being the return on sales, which slipped from above 26% in FY2010/11 to around 17% in FY2014/15.

While Singapore Post’s net margin is still healthy, it’s worth pointing out that the operating profit from the firm’s all-important mail division has stalled over the past five fiscal years (see chart just below). This can be a potential point of concern for investors.

Operating Profit Singpost

image-15.png

Source: Singapore Post’s earnings report

Elsewhere, the asset turnover ratio (orange line in the first chart) clocked in at an average of 0.51 over the timeframe under study, meaning to say Singapore Post had generated an average of 51 cents of revenue for each asset dollar employed.

On a brighter note, Singapore Post’s financial leverage (green line in the first chart) has declined over the firm’s past five fiscal years. While the fall in the metric had been a big contributor to the firm’s shrinking ROE, it also means that Singapore Post is now facing lesser financial risks.

As you can see in the next chart below, Singapore Post’s balance sheet has strengthened considerably over the years and this had contributed to the lower financial leverage.

image13.png


Source: Singapore Post’s earnings report

A Fool’s take

A winning stock may be found when a company demonstrates a consistent track record of generating superior value for each shareholder dollar it has at its disposal.

It’s not nice to see a ROE that shrinks, but it’s worth noting that Singapore Post has still been able to keep its ROE at a respectable level even in FY2014/15. The question here is whether Singapore Post is able to maintain its net margin and execute a transition towards a logistics- and eCommerce-driven business at the same time. This is a tough proposition, but the firm’s strong balance sheet may help support the transition.

With that, the onus remains with the Foolish investor to decide if Singapore Post’s current share price provides an appropriate margin of safety and whether it fits into his or her portfolio.
 

Sai777

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Messages
17,061
Reaction score
2
PE is 27.6. PB is 3.65. Profit margin decline to less than 16%.

I like to think that this is a defensive stock and collect div. But not at this price. Cash rich but does not generate return.

Unless there are big plans behind these numbers.

Vested.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top