(Storage) SSD Discussion Thread

wilflare

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2002
Messages
9,899
Reaction score
25
if using mac, go for the Vertex 2,
if using windows with sata3, go for Crucial Real C300! :D
 

quekky

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2000
Messages
18,440
Reaction score
0
Perhaps it is factory defect or reject.
Don't be fooled by the FAST sequential read/write.
maybe it's really a reject, or could be my mobo. I'm using a old intel DP965LT mobo.

I've read up before i buy, and i know the write speed is slow compared to others, but the price is very cheap so i just grab it. C300 is S$100+ more that time, over my budget... gov only give $400 leh...
anyway it's still so much faster than traditional hdd

can i ask how ur crucial c300 is connected? via sata 3 port or sata 2? also in ahci? i have the 64gb variant and if u search thru hwz forum in hardware channel I managed to get the very best out of it. :o

thanks, only sata2 on my intel mobo. let me see if there's any setting in the bios
 
Last edited:

adrianlee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2001
Messages
20,067
Reaction score
1
Crucial RealSSD C300 64GB Review
Crucial currently wears the fastest consumer SSD crown, as seen in our recent review of the 256GB C300. Thanks to the SATA 6Gb/s interface and Marvell controller, Crucial's SSDs manage spectacular speeds. 256GB SSDs aren't for everyone though, Crucial has wisely expanded their capacity offerings to include 128GB and 64GB versions of the C300. In this review we dive into the 64GB model (CTFDDAC064MAG-1G1), highlighting the differences to the 256GB patriarch of the RealSSD C300 family.
http://www.storagereview.com/crucial_realssd_c300_64gb_review
 

kotori

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2001
Messages
895
Reaction score
3
i think most of us hooted when crucial first had that promo with the 128gb too... :) nonetheless, great ssd to use till the next gen arrives
 

troublesome58

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
1,350
Reaction score
27
I've been waiting for intel gen3 (or any other brand's gen 3) to come out for a very long time. Any news on that so far?
 

StGrim

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
775
Reaction score
0
if using mac, go for the Vertex 2,
if using windows with sata3, go for Crucial Real C300! :D

May I know why would you say this? Is it because mac uses sata2? So if I'm windows with sata 2, I shld go for the vertex as well right?
 
Last edited:

guanyu158

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
0
May I know why would you say this? Is it because mac uses sata2? So if I'm windows with sata 2, I shld go for the vertex as well right?

win7 supports trim while mac os doesn't. if use intel gen2 with mac, the write speed will drop significantly couple of months later. and intel doesn't provide the ssd toolbox for mac like they do for win xp. it's troublesome to restore the ssd to optimal performance under mac.

but vertex 2 uses sandforce controller. reviews say that sandforce controller handles it a lot better and performance will only drop a little even without trim or toolbox.

for crucial c300, it supports sata3 while others are sata2 only. so if your pc supports sata3, c300 can reach 350MB read.
 
Last edited:

StGrim

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
775
Reaction score
0
win7 supports trim while mac os doesn't. if use intel gen2 with mac, the write speed will drop significantly couple of months later. and intel doesn't provide the ssd toolbox for mac like they do for win xp. it's troublesome to restore the ssd to optimal performance under mac.

but vertex 2 uses sandforce controller. reviews say that sandforce controller handles it a lot better and performance will only drop a little even without trim or toolbox.

for crucial c300, it supports sata3 while others are sata2 only. so if your pc supports sata3, c300 can reach 350MB read.

Thank you for the insightful reply. However, my motherboard only supports sata2, thus which model would be preferred in this application. I am actually using a 80gb intel x-25m for my os drive. Looking to upgrade in november. Very much prefer high random read/write perf compared to sequential read/write due to use as an os drive.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top