(Storage) SSD Discussion Thread

Hugo

Master Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
4,016
Reaction score
1
intend to get a 128gb to replace my suspected dying kingston 64gb.

which is the recommended drive to get now?
vertex 4? Sam 830? m4?
will be ordering from the us..
 
Last edited:

xonix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2001
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1,689
OCZ's new Vector SSD breaks cover at IDF, packs in-house developed Indilinx controller -- Engadget

oczvectorssdlead01.jpg
 

xonix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2001
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1,689
I think it was shown on the brochures during the last Comex Show.

Can't remember which booth.
 

goenitz33

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
15,352
Reaction score
2
Hmmm looks like Intel 520 120GB have dropped to a really reasonable level now, is it worth to buy ?

in the budget of 150-170s, considering the Crucial m4 128GB, Samsung 830 128GB and Intel 520 120GB now.

will be on a SATA2 board so lol.........
 

yukita

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,487
Reaction score
218
Hmmm looks like Intel 520 120GB have dropped to a really reasonable level now, is it worth to buy ?

in the budget of 150-170s, considering the Crucial m4 128GB, Samsung 830 128GB and Intel 520 120GB now.

will be on a SATA2 board so lol.........
personally i would suggest get M4 .... especially you on SATA2 :)
 

hlots123

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,207
Reaction score
11
curious, i ran the cmd "fsutil fsinfo ntfsinfo c:" on my ssd drive and the output is--
Bytes Per Sector : 512
Bytes Per Physical Sector : 512
Bytes Per Cluster : 4096

kinda surprised, i thought at least "Bytes Per Physical Sector" should be 4096 for ssd? instead it looks like mine is 512-byte native (like older non-advance format hdd), if so how come proper alignment during os install is required?
Information about Microsoft support policy for large-sector drives in Windows
 

porcu

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
13,742
Reaction score
0
How about SanDisk Extreme? Bought the 480Gb yesterday at $529,installed it and running it. Gonna do benchmarks soon.
I just went for the cheapest and biggest ssd to replace the freaking slow HDD which came with my new Y580 laptop.
 

enenyi

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
5,927
Reaction score
5
How about SanDisk Extreme? Bought the 480Gb yesterday at $529,installed it and running it. Gonna do benchmarks soon.
I just went for the cheapest and biggest ssd to replace the freaking slow HDD which came with my new Y580 laptop.
Agreed. The Y580's 5400rpm is a bottleneck to the laptop. After I swapped it out for a Sandisk Extreme 120GB, Lenovo Boot Optimizer timing dropped from 75sec to 21sec. See how fast the 480GB will perform on yours. :)

And did u get the full-HD Y580p?
 

porcu

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
13,742
Reaction score
0
Now, my optimiser said 18secs :D
Yes, mine is the full HD version. Love the screen. I had NO REGRETS selling my retina MBP.

Got the test below on drive c (drive d didn't test as I partitioned my drive into 2). Slower than my M4 256Gb on my desktop though by abit.
Is the below performance reasonable?


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 448.173 MB/s
Sequential Write : 178.587 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 383.902 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 155.038 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 25.227 MB/s [ 6159.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 10.370 MB/s [ 2531.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 174.663 MB/s [ 42642.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 58.862 MB/s [ 14370.6 IOPS]

Test : 1000 MB [C: 36.2% (93.8/258.8 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2012/09/16 10:38:10
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
 

porcu

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
13,742
Reaction score
0
This is what I got posted from my desktop.
Crucial M4 256Gb

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : Crystal Dew World
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 508.853 MB/s
Sequential Write : 264.325 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 419.361 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 267.219 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 23.371 MB/s [ 5705.7 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 75.774 MB/s [ 18499.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 191.509 MB/s [ 46755.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 232.099 MB/s [ 56664.8 IOPS]

Test : 1000 MB [C: 76.4% (61.4/80.3 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2012/09/16 10:44:45
OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top