Just completed the interview.
The questions were not very significant in terms of technicality of the law, and I believe were mainly posed to get a clearer sense of how you communicate your ideas and possibly to get an idea of your temperament and personality through the answering of the questions.
It would be sufficient to prepare by thinking of the interview as a sales pitch, and in this case, yourself as the product. It was mentioned that this year's batch has over 200 applicants vying for 50 places. I was then given 5 minutes to convince the panel as to why I deserve a place amongst the 50. This is in reference to the JD course.
Prof Darren was helming the panel, and there were representatives from the industry from family law, criminal law, and the community. (A total of 4 in the panel) Be prepared to answer questions on which side of the coin you are more favourable towards - family or criminal law, and why.
Also be prepared to answer how you are planning to fund the full course fees as that was also brought up towards the end of the interview.
All the best to everyone who applied!