The Watch Thread - Part 14

Status
Not open for further replies.

CeSaRiO

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
27,866
Reaction score
30
sISZmZl.jpg

Low profile Friday? :s13:
 

Ed.YEO

Banned
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
8,713
Reaction score
0
Staring at this screen for 5 days, TGIF. Had this for 6 years, my staple for weekdays. Not many Tag Heuers here.

NaykGPp.jpg
戴好嘢 不多因為不值得買。就有如 浪琴,采用一般機芯,廣告打得够力够力,再将廣告成本加在消费者身上。。。這樣的錶款。。。我是肯定不會買啦!
 

tak1985

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
need some expert advice. was about to pull trigger on GS SBGW253 limited ed until my wife say dor that price might as well get a Rolex. I looked at Rolex and at the same price range I only like Oyster Perpetual. Which is a better buy?
 

rachdanon

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
18,187
Reaction score
5,180
戴好嘢 不多因為不值得買。就有如 浪琴,采用一般機芯,廣告打得够力够力,再将廣告成本加在消费者身上。。。這樣的錶款。。。我是肯定不會買啦!

Hiyah last time never think too much. Watch is emotional puchase, if everyone think like you only in monetary terms, then buy a simple digital casio most value for money..

But seriously, in-house vs non in-house is much less a case of capability but simple supply and economics. With the cease in swatch supplying, manufacturers simoly become in-house. There is a lot of expertise to go around. No sweat really to make in-house movements. It is the new norm. Panerai for example this year became fully in-house , thus including their entry level pieces. So what is he definition of an "ordinary" movement ? The in-house snobbery should end soon.....
 
Last edited:

MrSenG

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
491
Reaction score
0
Been looking at a few watches recently, really like the Royal Oak 'Jumbo' 15202ST (in steel, not yellow gold as seen below), but I found the Vacheron Constantin 1942 (Historiques Triple Calendrier) really interesting as well.

Sh1jpGP.jpg

Priced at $31,800 for the 15202ST.

KM0JgFj.jpg

Priced at $28,600 for the VC 1942.

Both are priced rather close, but ultimately...

5T26Nzy.jpg
 

rachdanon

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
18,187
Reaction score
5,180
need some expert advice. was about to pull trigger on GS SBGW253 limited ed until my wife say dor that price might as well get a Rolex. I looked at Rolex and at the same price range I only like Oyster Perpetual. Which is a better buy?

Buy what brings you most joy when its on your wrist for the least amount of money, makes sense? :D luxury watches is buying emotion. If you think of value, dont buy...waste of money. Invest the money is the best.
 

slow_mo

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
6,503
Reaction score
10
need some expert advice. was about to pull trigger on GS SBGW253 limited ed until my wife say dor that price might as well get a Rolex. I looked at Rolex and at the same price range I only like Oyster Perpetual. Which is a better buy?

Buy what you like lor. If cannot decide, just buy a bag for your wife and save the rest of the money! That should be sexciting! Jokes aside...

Did you try both watches on your wrist? Which one do you like more?
 
Last edited:

rachdanon

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
18,187
Reaction score
5,180
Been looking at a few watches recently, really like the Royal Oak 'Jumbo' 15202ST (in steel, not yellow gold as seen below), but I found the Vacheron Constantin 1942 (Historiques Triple Calendrier) really interesting as well.

Sh1jpGP.jpg

Priced at $31,800 for the 15202ST.

KM0JgFj.jpg

Priced at $28,600 for the VC 1942.

Both are priced rather close, but ultimately...

5T26Nzy.jpg


Very different looking watches, with the VC having a classic/antiquated look and the AP sportier more modern. If you really like both, looks like you need to get both..well at least you woud have completed 2/3 of the trinity :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top