TeenTitan01
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2007
- Messages
- 9,804
- Reaction score
- 0
Back to selling of the luxury watch image. To you it is crass, vulgar, no heritage/originality. To others crass and vulgar = bold, fashion forward.
Taking it a step further, PP, AP, VC = traditional, original to some but dated, blowing the history trumpet tiredlessly to others.
Some new money guys deliberately avoid the holy trinity and jump straight to an RM, embracing the snub they get from the old money folks and showing support for a watch brand that is reflective of their status in society.
Others the exact opposite, hoping to gain acceptance into the old money clique.
For most people (old and new $), they just get everything simply because they can afford to
OK, that ends my TLDR post about selling watch image
fashion is a dirty word when it comes to haute and decent, respectable horology and is anathema to the entire ethos of watchmaking and watch appreciation because it here today, gone tomorrow. it belongs to disposable cheap quartz watches. taste, design, yes. fashion, no.
these jokers are not called brand *****, ignoramii parvenus for nothing. these pariahs are to be educated, failing which are to be isolated, despised, ignored, and if necessary spat upon and b!tch-slapped to exorcise the demon of crassness, vulgarity and extreme bad taste from them. only losers like them feel proud to embrace the snub when the entire social ladder is laughing at their bad taste.
better to donate money to charity than support the agents of bad taste! there's enough ugliness in this world to afford another gangsta-rapper/movie star/athlete/baller/etc sporting a chunky over-encrusted diamond rolex/rm/hublot.
