wow wow wow.. this is pretty interesting news.. EDMW-quality material hehe
On a more serious note, if the blogger herself does not know that her watch is a fake (and I wonder how jase knows.. perhaps by scrutinising the pictures she posted..), I hope she had received it as a freebie and just made to look stupid vs having genuinely paid good $ for it.
And also on another note, I wonder what's the difference between fake and replica, as jase's post seems to suggest there is a distinction.
not sure where she got the watch, but pretty sure given her status, if she knew, she probably will not be wearing it. not me, i didn't spot it, another reowned watch blogger/reviewer who used to work for Hublot spotted it. technically he was the guy in Hublot who writes the guidelines on how to spot fake watches, so his words are golden.
hmm i mean in my own opinion, replica is something like a copy of the original, maybe differences is in movement or maybe the material used but overall looks pretty the same.
Fake is u copy the brand name but the design is somehow changed.
Example for the Hublot fusion chrono she is wearing, has no day date window at the 6 o'çlock while the original has. Well something like that, so its not even worth to be called a replica.


