You do understand that this is a retail business and it’s up to the discretion of the AD to decide who they want to sell to. This doesn’t come under an employment act or contractual act or laws of contracts, so I don’t think they are under obligation to prove that the flipper have actually transacted and sold the watch and questioning the integrity of the system just because you feel they need to prove that the sale have taken place is a bit excessive IMHO. By attempting to sell online, whether it really gets sold or not, at end of the day, it is up to the retail business to decide whether they wish to continue selling to that customer. Because the intention to flip is already there. You can also be guilty of attempting to molest someone and whether the molest actually takes place is immaterial.
Yes, that’s why I did also say I can respect a difference in views of why someone would view a discussion like this in front of a customer like me unprofessional although I don’t see it that way. And nobody says the seniors are indispensable. No one is indispensable in the modern era in any case. What I’m saying is that what happened hasn’t affected how I view her and I’m sure many of her existing customers concurs with how we see her as a sales person to her clients as well as the organisation in which she worked in.
Good discussion nonetheless and good night
