What's wrong with Intel???

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
6,339
Reaction score
1,489
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.tw...d-leaks-ahead-intel-comet-lake-cpu/index.html

67599_13_gigabytes-next-gen-z490-board-leaks-ahead-intel-comet-lake-cpu.jpg


Still on 14nm+++ and no PCIE 4.0?? Intel deserves to relive it's Prescott days seriously!!
 
Last edited:

grimfan

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2001
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
2
Worse than Prescott cause all products segments under attack by AMD including notebooks if the Surface notebook rumor is true.
 

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
6,339
Reaction score
1,489
Stupid. As we get more GPU limited at the resolutions most play these days, I think AMD should be a far greater choice if not the best in time to come. Doesn't even look like there are much IPC changes to the architecture. Only clockspeed increases. To think you need a new motherboard to accommodate another 14nm+++ processor with almost no technological advances on the chipset like PCIE 4.0. Only Intel is capable of **** like this.
 
Last edited:

watzup_ken

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2003
Messages
25,671
Reaction score
2,123
From an upgrader standpoint, there is 0 reason to "upgrade" to the latest from Intel. However if someone needs a brand new computer, then may be worth considering on getting the 4xx series board and new Intel chip. My take is that even the top end Z490 board is likely not compatible with Ice Lake desktop chips considering how Intel always tries to pull a fast one on consumers by forcing you to buy a "new" chipset.
 

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
6,339
Reaction score
1,489
This has to be the most moof milking run Intel has done on a 14nm+++. I struggle to think why they even bother with a new motherboard requirement for the new 10th generation processors which probably is just adding core count more than anything else. IPC is stagnant and technologically backward not offering native PCIE 4.0 within chipset support. Joke of the year.
 

xonix

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2001
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1,689
From some articles I've read, possible reason why Intel is stuck on 14nm for so long is partly due to their monolithic design ( compared to AMD chiplet approach )
 

Koenig168

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
10,037
Reaction score
1,748
This has to be the most moof milking run Intel has done on a 14nm+++. I struggle to think why they even bother with a new motherboard requirement for the new 10th generation processors ....

why milk once when you can milk twice? :s13:
 

yusoffb01

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Messages
16,815
Reaction score
1,769
This has to be the most moof milking run Intel has done on a 14nm+++. I struggle to think why they even bother with a new motherboard requirement for the new 10th generation processors which probably is just adding core count more than anything else. IPC is stagnant and technologically backward not offering native PCIE 4.0 within chipset support. Joke of the year.

onda motherboard can support gen 6,7,8,9 but intel force u to buy new motherboard
https://youtu.be/dLkWB-Iw3-s
 

SkyShroud

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
1,513
Must thanks amd for forcing intel to pump their cores but lack 4.0 support.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
48,316
Reaction score
7,461
Intel joining GPU wars soon.
No idea why Nvidia haven't join CPU wars.
I am waiting for three faction fight.

Red vs Green vs Blue.
 

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
6,339
Reaction score
1,489
Actually for gaming now, there is almost virtually very little or negligible difference between both camps now as far as frame rates are concerned. And the AMD is a far far better investment over the long run. I don't see any benefit of having an Intel over the AMD anymore after the Ryzen 3000 series. And I seriously hope the 4000 series will nail Intel to the coffin.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top