Which method is more correct in saving fuel?

Albedo

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
34,779
Reaction score
2,400
What car U driving?

Most CVT transmission slow in pick up so maybe more fuel efficient :s13:

Was driving a 1.6 CVT, now is 1.6 Auto. Can feel the difference since CVT was 4 gears (?) and this auto gearbox is 6.
 

New Eden

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
31,884
Reaction score
1,150
Just down 2 gears and rev it hard let turbo kick in. No need care about fc. :(
 

tk

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
8,544
Reaction score
357
Was driving a 1.6 CVT, now is 1.6 Auto. Can feel the difference since CVT was 4 gears (?) and this auto gearbox is 6.

CVT is continuous lah.. no fixed 'number' of gears.. that's why it get better FC..
 

Alphas

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
41,192
Reaction score
5,628
There is a RPM zone where the engine is the most efficient in fuel consumption. If you can obtain that data then u know how to keep within the RPM. Most ICE is about 2000-2700, generally smaller cc has higher efficiency at higher rpm while larger cc has higher efficiency at lower of 2000 RPM.
 

Elnin0

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2001
Messages
26,552
Reaction score
8
A slow acceleration still saves fuel. Of coz not slow until hogging the road lah.
 

keenklee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2000
Messages
19,432
Reaction score
6,788
Thanks. Now trying out method 1 and see. While the car is moving faster now, i don't enjoy hearing the engine at high rev. Maybe i will get used to it. :s13::s13:

You should install one of those monitoring devices like SCANGAUGE and look at the instantaneous FC. You will then probably too busy monitoring and will not hear the engine rev. :s13:
 

Voyager12345

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
For the 2 style of driving i have below, which one would you think is more fuel saving?

1. Accelerate hard so that the car shifts into the highest gear as soon as possible. The thinking behind this style is that the highest gear is more fuel efficient. This would mean rev to maybe 3k RPM to get the gearbox to switch asap.

2. Accelerate slowly, keeping the rev to below 2.5k RPM. Maybe reach the next junction also won't get to shift to 3rd of 4th gear but at least the acceleration is slow. The thinking is low RPM = drink less fuel.

Which of the above method would you think is better for FC?

TIA!

I've tried to follow these steps too...😀
 

Byakuya

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
2,382
Reaction score
0
the smaller the throttle opening (aka how deep your right foot buries into), the less fuel the injectors squirt as in closed loop the AFR target is stoich.

doesn't matter your RPM since if your throttle is always 5% your RPM won't go up anyway past a certain point.
 

hammee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 24, 2001
Messages
10,326
Reaction score
3
Rubbish idea you have..

You want to save money on petrol yet you go and buy additive, spend more money instead.
If it works for me. I don't see where is the rubbish.
I DIY my own servicing, I know my car well what effective whats not.
 

Albedo

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
34,779
Reaction score
2,400
You should install one of those monitoring devices like SCANGAUGE and look at the instantaneous FC. You will then probably too busy monitoring and will not hear the engine rev. :s13:
My car display the real time FC but it may not be the most accurate, it can go highest 30km/lit nia.
The overall FC also not accurate compared to my manual calculation...

Sent from a tiny corner in SG using GAGT
 

carloverme

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
262
Reaction score
0
If it works for me. I don't see where is the rubbish.
I DIY my own servicing, I know my car well what effective whats not.

Inever say the additive doesn't work.

I am saying, you are trying to save money by buying additives.
How can you save when you buy ?
Unless you tell me your additive cost almost $0.10 per whatever you pour in that can save you more than $0.10..
It never happens. Wake up. If additives works, car manufacturer will send you a carton as free gift and petrol companies will protest against selling such additives in their stores.
Until today, 2017 , July already, you still believe in additive ?

Now tell me how much you spend on a unit of additive, and how much money can it save per usage ?
convince us.
 

mel1888

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2015
Messages
13,364
Reaction score
4,490
My take is if u own car why bother on saving fuel. I drive how i like n where i like. If yr scrimping on every cent, sell the car n u will save a tonne.
 

shadow84

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
34,286
Reaction score
420
Since we are on the topic of fuel consumption, which scenario is better?

1. turn fan knob high, but AC knob low = air may not feel as cool but the fanspeed will make up for its coolness.

2. turn fan knob low, but AC knob high = Feels cool and more shiok if its on a hot day.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top