which ryzen 3000 should i get?

Humster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2000
Messages
23,489
Reaction score
2,648
Totally get the turned off part, I ended up ordering my Ryzen 5 3600 from Amazon for US$206.86, shipping included. A price that probably won't be seen in SG for some time (that is, if one can even buy the processor alone in the first place), until the SLS retailers decide that the demand hype has died down, and they can't chop carrot head anymore.

Lol, a lot of people here forgotten the 1mth later rule. Wait 1 mth after release, then see the price, see if any bugs or other issues that might surface. But for this case, 2 mths might be better, since the supply might be a bit tight.
Just take the time to do a bit more research.
 

Phen8210

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
29,034
Reaction score
8,286
Lol, a lot of people here forgotten the 1mth later rule. Wait 1 mth after release, then see the price, see if any bugs or other issues that might surface. But for this case, 2 mths might be better, since the supply might be a bit tight.
Just take the time to do a bit more research.

for ryzen is 6 month ;)
 

Phen8210

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
29,034
Reaction score
8,286
3700x is a good choice, many 6 core CPUs are close to hitting limits in modern AAA titles especially when paired with a high end GPU.

i'm too lazy to argue.. battlefield V with a rtx 2060 already easily 80+% CPU usage. With high end GPUs it will be a bottleneck.

Sigh, that's why i seldom visit HWZ anymore and prefer reading info about tech on other mediums. Reddit downvote system make people use their head before posting.
 
Last edited:

stylechap

Master Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2010
Messages
4,204
Reaction score
342
i'm too lazy to argue.. battlefield V with a rtx 2060 already easily 80+% CPU usage. With high end GPUs it will be a bottleneck.

Sigh, that's why i seldom visit HWZ anymore and prefer reading info about tech on other mediums. Reddit downvote system make people use their head before posting.

I hope you don't go crazy arguing between 2 sides in your brain
 

Humster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2000
Messages
23,489
Reaction score
2,648
for ryzen is 6 month ;)

Ya, from what I see, the supply is gonna be really tight all over the world, due to the hype.
Maybe 6mths later, we see 2nd hand Ryzen 3 for sale due to player's remorse. :s22:
 

gld998

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
38,440
Reaction score
2,346
Totally get the turned off part, I ended up ordering my Ryzen 5 3600 from Amazon for US$206.86, shipping included. A price that probably won't be seen in SG for some time (that is, if one can even buy the processor alone in the first place), until the SLS retailers decide that the demand hype has died down, and they can't chop carrot head anymore.
Why buy local and support this greedy retailers. I now only buy online or direct from distro. If they cannot up their game, pls close.

Sent from Old Man Pressing On For Retirement using GAGT
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,769
Reaction score
91
Lol, a lot of people here forgotten the 1mth later rule. Wait 1 mth after release, then see the price, see if any bugs or other issues that might surface. But for this case, 2 mths might be better, since the supply might be a bit tight.
Just take the time to do a bit more research.
But Intel's bug comes after a few years..lol
 

SkyShroud

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
1,513
3600 oc or 3600x now is the go for value
afterall considering the mb+ram+cpu is still cheaper and that price difference could means getting a tier better gpu for those making whole new rig

the extra threads also means worry free of your background processes
also more capable of recording or streaming game videos if you ever wanted to, with minimum impact to game performance.
 

congster2

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
13,268
Reaction score
5,359
At the higher end, you are paying about 20usd per thread. Quite consistent mid to upper range. So actually the 3900x is quite vfm.

Tempted to buy one of these just for fun. Run some // python code or something.
 

grimfan

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2001
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
2
And yet in real life with a 2080ti playing BFV at 1440p ultra in a 64 MP settings with the 8700K, a
4C/8T CPU we have yet to see it bottlenecking let alone a 6C/12T CPU. Some folks like to talk out of their ASx.:s22:
8700k is a 6 cores 12 threads CPU. Although a 3600 is most value for money today, there is a possible use case for 8 cores 16 threads just a few years down the road.

If your workload is just gaming today, 3600 is fantastic value but if you want a little more performance for video encoding/transcoding etc, a 3700X is better and won't need an upgrade in a few years' time.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Messages
129,954
Reaction score
7,233
8700k is a 6 cores 12 threads CPU. Although a 3600 is most value for money today, there is a possible use case for 8 cores 16 threads just a few years down the road.

If your workload is just gaming today, 3600 is fantastic value but if you want a little more performance for video encoding/transcoding etc, a 3700X is better and won't need an upgrade in a few years' time.

by then u probably gonna upgrade ur system lo
 

curryloti

Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
430
Reaction score
57
8700k is a 6 cores 12 threads CPU. Although a 3600 is most value for money today, there is a possible use case for 8 cores 16 threads just a few years down the road.

If your workload is just gaming today, 3600 is fantastic value but if you want a little more performance for video encoding/transcoding etc, a 3700X is better and won't need an upgrade in a few years' time.
But if newer 6 core also can win older 8 core both ways already then how?

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/121710947-post56.html
 

garren555

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
hi 4c/8t is not enough for some new game you can see bfv 7700k have a lower 1% and for multiplayer game you really wan that extra core. Currently i am using an i7 4770 i have micro stutter in bfv multiplayer. You also have to see the min Fps not just the avg
 

grimfan

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2001
Messages
6,561
Reaction score
2
by then u probably gonna upgrade ur system lo

If you need the 2 extra cores or more of performance today, get the 3700X or 3900X else if just gaming, get the 3600 and upgrade later to a 8 cores or more later for the most bang for the buck.

But if newer 6 core also can win older 8 core both ways already then how?

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/121710947-post56.html

The question in discussion is whether today's games need more than 6 cores 12 threads. From the benchmarks only Shadows of the Tomb Raider and turn based games have some tangible gains from 8 cores and it ain't much.

If you are comparing to the Ryzen 2X00s, the IPC gains for Ryzen 3X00 make them a better buy for gaming as IPC is most important for gaming.


Anyways a new video from Gamers Nexus if the 3600X is worth the buy over the 3600 for the boost clocks.

 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top