Why I got infracted for 3 points?

[randyap]

Mod, need enlightenment how I was trolling troublemaker clone account?

 

[Intrinion]

Similar reason. You have been warned prior and agreed to be more mindful. Evidently this isn’t enough, so we had taken a tougher stance towards your account.

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...hread-reason-stirring-the-other-side.6724621/

 

[randyap]

Similar reason. You have been warned prior and agreed to be more mindful. Evidently this isn’t enough, so we had taken a tougher stance towards your account.

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...hread-reason-stirring-the-other-side.6724621/

U should post what exactly what did I post to let everyone here judge how is what I posted this time similar? From what I understand, u are talking about a potshot. Please be professional and point out which post is it this time to warrant your action.

 

[randyap]

Similar reason. You have been warned prior and agreed to be more mindful. Evidently this isn’t enough, so we had taken a tougher stance towards your account.

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...hread-reason-stirring-the-other-side.6724621/

Aren't you practising a double standard? You are targeting my account from what you have just said and you are very specific with it.

 

[Intrinion]

Aren't you practising a double standard? You are targeting my account from what you have just said and you are very specific with it.

We are practicing consistency.

You were given a reply ban from the thread was for “stirring of the other side”.

Very specifically, we have said no to taking pot shots or deviating from news discussions. You have agreed to it.

 

[randyap]

We are practicing consistency.

You had been given a reply ban from the thread was for “stirring of the other side”.
Very specifically, we have said no to taking pot shots or deviating from news discussions. You have agreed to it.

Still u are not posting what did I post to warrant your action?

 

[randyap]

Very specifically we were talking about potshots from what you have quoted from our last discussion. So prove your point by posting what did I do to warrant the same thing.

 

[Intrinion]

Still u are not posting what did I post to warrant your action?

I will post it when I post it.

 

[randyap]

I will post it when I post it.

So now mod can anyhow give infraction without any reasoning or basis to back their claims?

 

[randyap]

From what I have noticed about u, you haven't been professional in your job as a mod either. Instead u already been biased by making unsubstantiated claims like this faction isn't a good two shoes either.

 

[Ottoke]

Very specifically we were talking about potshots from what you have quoted from our last discussion. So prove your point by posting what did I do to warrant the same thing.

On behalf of @Intrinion

 

[randyap]

On behalf of @Intrinion

View attachment 30883

This is exactly what I was barred from the thread for previously and the case was closed by intrinion himself. Now it is brought up again to be infracted? ? ? The case was closed and over, now I am being fault again for a closed case????

 

[Ottoke]

This is exactly what I was barred from the thread for previously and the case was closed by intrinion himself. Now it is brought up again to be infracted? ? ? The case was closed and over, now I am being fault again for a closed case????

Was told from @Intrinion the warning has been removed, but post will stay deleted to prevent further reports.

O

 

[randyap]

Was told from @Intrinion the warning has been removed, but post will stay deleted to prevent further reports.

O

That is why I am asking him to quote out the exact post he is infracting me for currently to verify his claims, which he is shunning from doing.

The post u quoted what date it is? I'm very sure the date is before intrinion and my first discussion, and this is the exact post he barred me for from the thread previously. U look at the post u quoted and what intrinion quoted for the previous case, it is exactly the same post.

 

[randyap]

Obviously he himself made a mistake in this infraction. and he don't dare to come out and face his mistakes. @Intrinion

 

[Intrinion]

The post was removed from public view to prevent further reporting by regular posters within the thread. Per the agreement and previous understanding, kindly do not throw pot shots and derail the thread with unrelated discussions such as memes.

 

[Intrinion]

Obviously he himself made a mistake in this infraction. and he don't dare to come out and face his mistakes. @Intrinion

I don’t deal with a child demanding answers. If you speak nicely, I will reply you properly.

 

[Intrinion]

From what I have noticed about u, you haven't been professional in your job as a mod either. Instead u already been biased by making unsubstantiated claims like this faction isn't a good two shoes either.

I am not popular in either faction.
Neither do I care to appeal or kowtow to either party..

After all, on this forum, our perceived professionalism is only regarded when judgement or actions are ruled in one’s favour.

What I can see from my end is clear. There factions mass reporting from either side and sometimes even backstabbers within factional lines.

 

[randyap]

Mod, need enlightenment how I was trolling troublemaker clone account?

I don’t deal with a child demanding answers. If you speak nicely, I will reply you properly.

How was this not speaking nicely, multiple times u refused to admit your mistakes? I would think u seriously need to reflect on your own professionalism as a mod to resolve the issue.

Now u infracted someone failing to provide a basis. I got my answer. U failed your job.

I'll just leave it as it is here for all to see how u abused your mod previlges.

 

[Intrinion]

How was this not speaking nicely, multiple times u refused to admit your mistakes? I would think u seriously need to reflect on your own professionalism as a mod to resolve the issue.

Now u infracted someone failing to provide a basis. I got my answer. U failed your job.

I'll just leave it as it is here for all to see.

Ever wonder that it takes time to review? Reckon that mods may not be free to respond at that moment? Yet just because the moderator replies, she is assumed to be free to answer and a no answer thereafter, is an admission of guilt / refusal to correct a possible mistake?

Would spamming behaviour akin to a child demanding answers help?

I fail my job if I did not correct a wrong. I will apologize for that. However, I will also be clear that the infractions were not targeted towards a particular person which is your self and were issued based on contents of the reports.