Why I got infracted for 3 points?

Status
Not open for further replies.

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
I dont know quoting which post u infracted me for needs so much time, so much so u replied with a "for similar reasons." That is most unprofessional mod I've ever seen.

What every professional mod does is to just quote the post and move from there, unlike what u did here. If u need so much time to do a simple thing, it just reflects on your competency and professionalism.

Now u proceed to derail the thread to name calling, and finding excuse for your mistake. I don't intend to get into a petty squabble with the likes of u. U know very well how unprofessional are u and it's up for all to see.
 

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
Ever wonder that it takes time to review? Reckon that mods may not be free to respond at that moment? Yet just because the moderator replies, she is assumed to be free to answer and a no answer thereafter, is an admission of guilt / refusal to correct a possible mistake?

Would spamming behaviour akin to a child demanding answers help?

I fail my job if I did not correct a wrong. I will apologize for that. However, I will also be clear that the infractions were not targeted towards a particular person which is your self and were issued based on contents of the reports.
Just admit u are biased lar. Do until so obvious already everyone also can see. Your initial point is I potshotted like I did with the previous post I was barred for, which u couldn't prove. Not asking u to do a fyp on the subject, but just quote the message u infracted me for like any other mod will do. I get it why u don't dare, it's precisely it will make u appear how biased and ridiculous are you.

Now u want to degrade and derail this thread into a name calling squabble. Just remember u now have track record of infracting someone without any basis. U happy can liao.
 
Last edited:

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
So whats the post which got infracted?

:s11:
This is the exact post quoted by Ottoke i got infracted for.
But this post was exactly the post that i was penalised previously by Intrinion and the issue has been resolved.
So my guess is he did not delete my post which he thought he did, and came back to penalise me again for the same post. This post was finally deleted by him at 1.37pm 10 april, i guess as i received a notification that a post was deleted.

The post was removed from public view to prevent further reporting by regular posters within the thread. Per the agreement and previous understanding, kindly do not throw pot shots and derail the thread with unrelated discussions such as memes.
Identity of reporters are confidential. Yet you hint them to regular posters within the thread, are you trying to create discords amongst thread participants? What is your intention? Memes can't and does not serve to derail threads, memes are commonly used in edmw as a form of expression.
 
Last edited:

Intrinion

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
36,432
Reaction score
3,250
Just admit u are biased lar. Do until so obvious already everyone also can see. Your initial point is I potshotted like I did with the previous post I was barred for, which u couldn't prove. Not asking u to do a fyp on the subject, but just quote the message u infracted me for like any other mod will do. I get it why u don't dare, it's precisely it will make u appear how biased and ridiculous are you.

Now u want to degrade and derail this thread into a name calling squabble. Just remember u now have track record of infracting someone without any basis. U happy can liao.
You are entitled to your opinion. My conscience is clear. As much as you felt like you are entitled to an immediate answer, there’s no need to go on a character assassination offensive and cast brick bats while things were being sorted out in due course.

My fellow moderator stepped in to assist as I was engaged in other more important matters.

If there was conspiracy as you have alleged, then it would be especially dumb for the “smoking gun” to be nicely packaged to you by my fellow moderator.

If, I am as biased, unprofessional, slow (yes perhaps I am) as you made me out to be, then I can simply cook up an infraction without basis can’t I?

Clearly, there was a misunderstanding that required a further review of the post in question for it to be sorted out. The following actions had also been taken post review -
1. The post was deleted so that it would not be subjected to reports again.
2. Your warning was reversed.
 

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
You are entitled to your opinion. My conscience is clear. As much as you felt like you are entitled to an immediate answer, there’s no need to go on a character assassination offensive and cast brick bats while things were being sorted out in due course.

My fellow moderator stepped in to assist as I was engaged in other more important matters.

If there was conspiracy as you have alleged, then it would be especially dumb for the “smoking gun” to be nicely packaged to you by my fellow moderator.

If, I am as biased, unprofessional, slow (yes perhaps I am) as you made me out to be, then I can simply cook up an infraction without basis can’t I?

Clearly, there was a misunderstanding that required a further review of the post in question for it to be sorted out. The following actions had also been taken post review -
1. The post was deleted so that it would not be subjected to reports again.
2. Your warning was reversed.
No one is asking for immediate answers but just a quote of the post. You made a mistake precisely because u came in with a tinted glass targeting me specifically, everything would have been clear and resolved at the start if u have been professional Iike other mods do and quote the post from the start. Instead of judging first and let it spiral. This is nothing about u being busy with other things as quoting a post can be done easily upon request like your fellow mod did and you digging our previous conversations, yet u chose to engage in a judgemental conversation and degrading it into a meaningless name calling squabble. My purpose of starting this thread is for my infraction points to be reversed because clearly there is a mistake. whether u have been professional or not is not the purpose of this thread and your actions here has spoken for itself, so lets keep it that way.
 
Last edited:

Kumar22

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
16,765
Reaction score
6,402
No one is asking for immediate answers but just a quote of the post. You made a mistake precisely because u came in with a tinted glass targeting me specifically, everything would have been clear and resolved at the start if u have been professional Iike other mods do and quote the post from the start. Instead of judging first and let it spiral. This is nothing about u being busy with other things as quoting a post can be done easily upon request like your fellow mod did and you digging our previous conversations, yet u chose to engage in a judgemental conversation and degrading it into a meaningless name calling squabble. My purpose of starting this thread is for my infraction points to be reversed because clearly there is a mistake. whether u have been professional or not is not the purpose of this thread and your actions here has spoken for itself, so lets keep it that way.
@Intrinion
He does have a point or 2 you know.
Sometimes an apology can resolve such matters easier.
 

Hiling care

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
18,686
Reaction score
9,733
EB002-E38-4-D7-C-4649-AF8-A-144828-B81-C58.jpg


Maybe this is #whitenoise, but it seems relevant on this occasion.
 

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
Till now the infraction points has not been reversed , despite the truth has been out. I will update the thread once the infraction is lifted so this case can come to end.

I can come to peace with the infracted points as I know this is a clear fault from a biased mod who refuses to correct his mistakes. But I hope this mod can come to terms inside himself to continue living with his "clear conscience". @Intrinion
 

randyap

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
17,747
Reaction score
10,170
Last edited:

Intrinion

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
36,432
Reaction score
3,250
There is currently no message to inform you that a warning has been reversed. This is a limitation of the forum software.


You may check your list of warnings by going to your profile and clicking on the hyperlinked warning page

A1DC27B8-3B2C-4F4A-B08F-6B01F1AD88E3.jpeg
F9F4B9C4-DADC-4904-B480-452BBF23459C.jpeg
Alternatively there should be a warnings tab as well. Do let us know if you are unable to see either of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top