Then how do you all propose narrowing the income gap?
And u guys think singapore is in a perfect or good state of economy now with its policy on foreigners and on labour ?
1) Short-term MUBI.
NMP Associate Prof Walter proposed Majulah Universal Basic Income Scheme (MUBI) at $ $110 a week for 12 weeks. This will be considered taxable income and cost $4.62 billion.
https://www.straitstimes.com/politi...-basic-income-scheme-to-help-singaporeans-get
It's proposed to be funded from future taxes (not sure if they would see the reserves gain)
2a).
Unemployment Insurance funded by private or public There's another interesting concept of unemployment insurance with MP Mdm Sylvia has proposed, or several years back, they have proposed these as well.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...nce-help-retrenched-older-workers-has-serious
https://www.insurancebusinessmag.co...s-unemployment-insurance-proposal-215317.aspx
Previous response on unemployment insurance:
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...we-have-is-better-than-unemployment-insurance
It is a unique perspective of unemployment insurance, which
- targetted at PMETS, which targets to provide an additional safety nets, on top of existing government policies.
Personally, I feel that their idea is excellent and the execution of the research done with facts and figures, is an interesting concept. If it were funded by private companies willing to probably take up the underwriting and statistics, it would be an interesting idea.
The thing about UBI , is that it simply pushes the inequality level upwards (hypothetically) and inflates existing essential goods.
Example, to base off ComCare / Workfare incomes, the presuming basic level of income would be say, $1,300 per month.
If everybody in the country gets $200+ per month, does this mean that the new base level would be $1,500 per month?
Since the wages of income of say, food and essential workers has risen, businesses bearing the bulk of it would simply pass on the costs to consumers, leading to an upward spiral.
How about the government feed it? Sure, let's see what China's social security fund:
The elderly in China do not work. It is shameful for Chinese nationals to come over to Singapore to see elderly citizens working as cleaners etc. :
has a two-tier pension system, consisting of a basic pension and a mandatory employee contribution to a second-tier plan. It covers urban workers and many of the parameters depend on province-wide (rather than national) average earnings.
China's pension system by the worldbank:
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/967081468261926761/pdf/Chinas-pension-system-a-vision.pdf
A bit too long for me to read, maybe another day.
What if the elderly citizens had funds paid by the government to target the poorest? Do they give to all - or just the poorest? What funds are required?
The equivalent answer would be Silver Support Scheme, which is expected to rise its criteria and payout amounts in 2020.
2)b) HK says not to follow SG's pension model:
http://theindependent.sg/scmp-to-hk-govt-dont-follow-singapores-cpf-system/
https://www.scmp.com/business/globa...pores-pension-fund-not-model-hong-kong-follow
Interesting.
You are right about the FW reliance situation, ageing population and this lack of entrepreneur situation, which I believe, the government is worried about and rightly so. In 2030,
of the population would be 65 years old and above.
Economics requires a lot of intense research and mathematics to delve into the cost of the plan. Perhaps more interestingly, required more intensive work and I go study more intensively then answer you.
TL;DR a) unemployment insurance b) short-term ubi or short-term grants like the budget etc., if the 2020 coronavirus depression effects are far more insidious and long-reaching effects