Grand Cru Blind Tasting Class - Taste Wine Like A Pro
http://www.finewines.com.sg/grand-cru-blind-tasting-class-taste-wine-like-a-pro/
http://www.finewines.com.sg/grand-cru-blind-tasting-class-taste-wine-like-a-pro/
trying to be a professional but still far far away from adjusting my palate.....haha....i drink mostly french wines that has more complexity.
Pauillac, Margaux, Pomerol, St Emilon and Graves would be a good start.

Not available in retail yet.The 2009 Ricolma was showing beautiful contrasts in the bouquet, between dark ripe fruit and rich & savory reduction sauce, yet with all the Tuscan hallmarks of dust and spice that you could ever hope for. It was dark, silky and vibrant with alluring grip on the palate, displaying blackberry, spice, cedar, and hints of tobacco. The finish was long with structure showing through in spades, yet still energetic and fruit focused. I'd say it needs a few more years in the cellar yet is still enjoyable now on its potential alone.
guys there is a grand cru bordeaux wine tasting on the 24 September featuring wines from 2000 - 2010. If you are have yet to taste a 1855 grand cru classe wines, here is a good chance.
http://www.finewines.com.sg/a-decade-bordeaux-wine-tasting/
ah sorry bro...I missed that post..I would highly recommend the 2nd wine of a smith haut lafitte or 2nd wine of pichon lalande....its about $70-80 but the wine is dammm good...it beats some of the the 4th/5th growth in the 1855 classification.
The wine in the video was the one I had, but a different vintage.
Apparently if you look closer, it is of a different cuvee as well.
The one you had is "Cuvee MMXIV" made from 100 year old vines.
The one on the video should be the normal morgon cuvee from slightly younger vines.
Anyway it must have been a delicious wine and i look forward to try it and compare it with Jean Foillard's beaujolais.
Thanks ikileo for sharing the french wine bar at Boon Tat St..its 5 mins from my office so a good place to drop by for a glass or two and learn a bit of french offerings.
ah sorry bro...I missed that post..I would highly recommend the 2nd wine of a smith haut lafitte or 2nd wine of pichon lalande....its about $70-80 but the wine is dammm good...it beats some of the the 4th/5th growth in the 1855 classification.
Bro
Thanks for recommending these two.
Am I right that every french producer in Bordeaux has 2nd label? Is 2nd label and 2nd wine saying the same thing? I think not.
For example, 2nd label means Mouton Rothschild has a 2nd label that is one notch below and within that 2nd label there is a more affordable 2nd wine. Is this the right way to think about it?
Are these (Haut Smith, Pichon Legende) considered 2nd growth producers but their 2nd label are value for money?
Thanks for sharing and teaching.

If it were easy to find, or to even define, second label wines there wouldn’t be a need for this website. Much like the subjectivity of wine drinking itself, the definition of a second label wine is up for debate.
The concept of second wines began in Bordeaux in the 18th century as a means for producers to utilize wine that was not chosen for the Chateau’s first label. Rather than waste this excess wine or sell it in bulk, the second label allowed winemakers to bottle and sell this still very high quality wine under their name and through their distribution channels.
Second label wines tend to be made of grapes from younger vines than the first label. They will also receive less pampering in the winery, generally getting fewer new oak barrels for aging. At the end of the day this results in wines that share a style and consistency with the first label but that are not as refined or structured.
Second labels are usually not meant for long-term aging. Instead they are very approachable when they are young and most are ready to drink upon release. The upshot for value-minded consumers is the ability to drink incredibly high quality wine produced by some of the world’s foremost winemakers for a fraction of the price (many times less than half) of their first label offerings.
Bordeaux is still the only wine region in the world that legally defines a second label. French wine law guarantees the grapes used for the Chateau’s second label are from the same estate as those used for the first label or grand vin. Outside of Bordeaux, however, there are no laws regulating second labels so producers will often bottle them with inferior fruit from entirely different regions. We do not consider these to be second labels, but rather a different line of wine that just happens to be owned by the same people.
For the purposes of this website, we will use fairly loose criteria to determine what a second label wine is. In addition to the proper second wines of Bordeaux, we will include declassified wines and wines made by respected producers that are sourced from less prestigious vineyards than their big brothers. For example, we will call a simple white Burgundy a second label to a Montrachet if it is bottled by the same negociant. Or perhaps a basic Cotes du Rhone made by a producer of Chateauneuf-du-Pape. We might even include a Ripasso made from the leftovers of a great Amarone.
The bottom line is we are more concerned with finding great wine than we are in sticking to a rigid definition of second label. The challenge for consumers is to separate the wheat from the chaff and identify the producers who strive to maintain the same high standards for their second wines as they do for their first. We believe this is where some of the world’s best value wines can be found.