thundermarch
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
- Messages
- 1,082
- Reaction score
- 0
Wonder why most shoemakers don't seem to offer nubuck options when it comes to dress shoes.
From what is shared, it would appear to be a superior option to split suede and I am presuming nubuck isn't prohibitively more expensive since we do see nubuck (at least based on labeling) used quite extensively in much lower priced casual shoes.
Well, in the setting of "higher end" shoes, nubuck seems to be more often used for exotics like croc, elephant, seal, etc. So the surface texture of the original leather is preserved, and yet it has the nap and "matte" appearance of suede. These leathers in and of itself are already quite expensive, so the clientele for these would be fairly select I would imagine, thus you won't see them so often.
Secondly, I think that though nubuck would generally be preferable to split suedes, the "nubuck" that we see in the lower priced casual shoes. Well, they could have come from hides with noticeable imperfections, with the buffing process hiding these defects somewhat (with the hides thus costing less). We are then essentially dealing with corrected grain leather. Also, if the hides come from more "obscure" tanneries, the tannage and ultimate quality of leather might also have a part to play in terms of cost. Well, the best stuff typically still does come from the best tanneries.