RyanJ
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2015
- Messages
- 69,613
- Reaction score
- 67,976
What exactly is the magnification achievable in Super Macro?
Always wanted to find out, since smartphone manufacturers do not publish reproduction ratios of their "macro" functions.
15 Ultra Macro uses the 70mm floating telephoto 1/2.51" sensor, likely MX858 but exact dimensions are nebulous so we stick to the published 5.7 x 4.3mm.
Magnification/Reproduction ratio = a subject's image size on a camera's sensor relative to the actual size of the subject.
For a 1:1 magnification ratio, (1x) a 5.7mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
For a 2:1 magnification ratio, (2x) a 2.85mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
For a 1:2 magnification ratio, (0.5x) a 11.4mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
and so on . . .
( Digital cropping is NOT true magnification )
Native Super Macro at 140mm..
22mm on a 5.7mm is 1:3.9 magnification ratio , only 0.26x.
Adding additional Macro Filters
Cross adapting my Raynox DCR250 clip on macro filter, a triple element achromat.
Just nice the macro image sensor is the most "centered" so the filter was useable, the 1 inch sensor with more lateral placement suffered vignetting with this filter
+8 macro dioptre, triple element achromat.
15mm on a 5.7mm is about 1:2.6 magnification ratio, about 0.38x
+3 macro dioptre, dual element achromat.
18mm on 5.7mm is about 1:3.16, 0.32x
Combining both +3 and +8 macro dioptre.
Unfortunately plane of focus was very thin, I was not too parallel and the right side was blur, not because of optical issues but my misalignment. Magnification gained seemed minimal over +8 and likely not worth the added weight.
13mm on 5.7mm is 1:2.3, about 0.44x
* White balance was on auto, the higher the magnification, the shorter the working distance, the less light / more shadow probably affected the WB. *
** Not sure if I have really gotten it correct, welcome if anyone can chip in **
Always wanted to find out, since smartphone manufacturers do not publish reproduction ratios of their "macro" functions.
15 Ultra Macro uses the 70mm floating telephoto 1/2.51" sensor, likely MX858 but exact dimensions are nebulous so we stick to the published 5.7 x 4.3mm.
Magnification/Reproduction ratio = a subject's image size on a camera's sensor relative to the actual size of the subject.
For a 1:1 magnification ratio, (1x) a 5.7mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
For a 2:1 magnification ratio, (2x) a 2.85mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
For a 1:2 magnification ratio, (0.5x) a 11.4mm long subject fills the width of a 5.7mm wide sensor.
and so on . . .
( Digital cropping is NOT true magnification )
Native Super Macro at 140mm..
22mm on a 5.7mm is 1:3.9 magnification ratio , only 0.26x.
Adding additional Macro Filters
Cross adapting my Raynox DCR250 clip on macro filter, a triple element achromat.
Just nice the macro image sensor is the most "centered" so the filter was useable, the 1 inch sensor with more lateral placement suffered vignetting with this filter
+8 macro dioptre, triple element achromat.
15mm on a 5.7mm is about 1:2.6 magnification ratio, about 0.38x
+3 macro dioptre, dual element achromat.
18mm on 5.7mm is about 1:3.16, 0.32x
Combining both +3 and +8 macro dioptre.
Unfortunately plane of focus was very thin, I was not too parallel and the right side was blur, not because of optical issues but my misalignment. Magnification gained seemed minimal over +8 and likely not worth the added weight.
13mm on 5.7mm is 1:2.3, about 0.44x
* White balance was on auto, the higher the magnification, the shorter the working distance, the less light / more shadow probably affected the WB. *
** Not sure if I have really gotten it correct, welcome if anyone can chip in **
