*clap emoji* THAT’S
*clap emoji* THE
*clap emoji* POINT.
Most investors in here are Singaporean, and going to retire in Singapore. They’re going to need SGD. Having Singaporean investors make huge hidden FX bets (by investing in non-SGD bonds) is almost always a bad idea.
If you’re not planning to retire in Singapore (if you might retire in the USA, say), then it does make sense to have some allocation to other currencies’ bonds.
Okay so this here is what always confuses me about this argument. Sure, if you invest in non-SGD bonds, you're implicitly going long on that currency. However, if you're investing in SGD bonds, you're also implicitly going long on SGD. So to me it seems like if it's important to spread your geographic exposure in equities, why is this not true with in bonds? Why would the eventual currency you expect to spend in be the determining factor of what you choose to go long on?
I want to make sure you know what you actually want to invest in, first, before you start picking particular funds. (At least you’re not mixing up USD bonds with unhedged global bonds, which, points for that.) You were complaining that MBH only gives you corporate bonds and A35 only gives you govvies, but… that’s the majority of what bond markets are.
Okay, so regarding corporate debt and government debt, yes, obviously together they basically make up the bond market (including stuff issued by sub-national entities and MBS and whatever). However, my point was that each individually is not.
And regarding AGGU and BND and BNDX yes these are all USD or USD-hedged - Though honestly, your question of "what actually want to invest in" is a good one. I wonder if you could comment on the thought process.
Overall, I expect that productivity grows in the long run, and factors accumulate, so the economy will grow in the long run. More specifically (separately?), I believe that the return on capital is positive and will not fall to 0.
I accept that financial markets are largely efficient, and so to beat market returns I need an edge over other active investors. Given that I don't have any, I look to passive vehicles that attempt to replicate market returns. Given that these are passive, their services are essentially commodities, and so I try to use the lowest cost options.
Overall, this market replication means I try to even out my exposure to different asset classes, geographies, sectors, entities.
- For equities, there are many vehicles that seem to expose you to these different things in a systematic way (market cap usually, but would revenue arguably make more sense for the thesis of "economy will expand forever"?).
- As for bonds, I'm basically trying to achieve the same thing, hence the search for a global bond ETF that includes all kinds of issuers.
- Again here I'm unsure about the right way to proportion exposure - by size of debt issued actually seems contrary to common sense (you'd take the most debt from the most indebted issuers?).
- I was also thinking that the US dollar could serve as the closest thing to an "international dollar", but would unhedged global bonds make more sense? Then I suppose the currency it was denominated in wouldn't really matter then, right?
- For real estate and raw materials, there hardly seems to be any kind of vehicle that amalgamates a broad swarth of assets into an investible vehicle, so I've held off on REITs or metals ETFs and the like for now.
Edit: Oh, and I don't really know how to think of CPF. Seems like free money so I'm gonna max it out, but not sure what that means for the rest of my portfolio.
Last edited: