[GVGT] Camcar video of Katong incident

Laneige

Honorary Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
111,881
Reaction score
15,446
whether it is the cyclist mistake or not, is taking someone's life because laziness to maintain 1.5m acceptable?
This one aside but those at 60kmh but cyclists cannot keep up so bus must stay 1.5m away or still must filter out during peak hrs to go back in again

why is LTA (U) giving this issues to bus drivers
Why must other drivers face this shi t
Not liked u make big roads
Roads already small n still want to squeeze in cyclists
Drivers need to filter out to between the lane of vehicles
Not just one vehicle but the entire lane will have to do this overtaking

Also not making sense where u want bus lanes for bus but u allow cyclist to be on the lane
Then this cyclist now is a motorist or a what status
Why bikes cannot be allowed and yet a slow moving cyclists r allowed on bus lanes … esp peak hrs

so if it’s not motorist the code of conduct is apply to who?

Anyway not saying don’t keep close distance to them but cyclists seem to have the best of everything

including standing in front of vehicles acting liked a bully n holding up the entire traffic
 

KnyghtRyder

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2002
Messages
18,016
Reaction score
3,277
The cyclist insisted she entered the left turning lane FIRST. And it is a single lane. So she thinks that the car should not "cut" her in the left turning lane. Leave enough room is not enough, some car can be even bigger size.

I think most drivers will make the same "mistake". So drivers must be very carefully when turning, keep a look out for these cyclists.

It is the drivers who paid road tax, these cyclists really think they own the roads.
So your argument is that because they don't pay road tax that cyclist have no right to safety on the road?
 

Laneige

Honorary Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
111,881
Reaction score
15,446
Follow behind is the right thing. Especially those driver with mega size cars. Bicycle and car squeezed into 1 single lane, both never want to give way, accident sure happen. In the end both parties suffer.

I guess the cyclist selected her prey one. If the driver was AMDK, driving Ferrari, such incident won't happened.
If big tall lorry or heavy truck u see she dares to stand in front or not
 

R6exR6

Master Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
2,728
maybe this should also apply to cyclists on footpaths when they encounter pedestrians ?

no ringing of bell and making pedestrians move onto the grass so that they can pass. just follow behind...

:s8:
They should. By right, cyclists supposed to give way to pedestrians. Ringing of bell is encouraged, as it is a safety measure to alert everyone of the close proximity of each other. Of course, incessant ringing is uncalled for. Expecting pedestrians to give way to cyclist is also selfish-entitlement; but if pedestrians are gracious enough to give way, all's good.
 

KnyghtRyder

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2002
Messages
18,016
Reaction score
3,277
maybe this should also apply to cyclists on footpaths when they encounter pedestrians ?

no ringing of bell and making pedestrians move onto the grass so that they can pass. just follow behind...

:s8:
Actually the code of conduct is that bicycles OUGHT to give way to pedestrians on the footpath.

I don't know where they learned that ringing bell means people have to siam them,
 

R6exR6

Master Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
2,728
well said. i really cannot understand most cyclists when on the road, expect motorists to keep their distance and look out for their safety. but when they are on pathment or PCN, they expect pedestrian to give way to them by ringing their bell excessively. strange.
Power corrupts. Speed of the car makes drivers wanna get slow cyclist out of the way. Speed of the bicycle makes riders wanna get slow pedestrians out of the way. Able and fast-walking pedestrians wanna get slow seniors out of the way.

It is what it is ... 😅
Thus, law & enforcement plus educated & gracious people will be much appreciated. 🙏
 

R6exR6

Master Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
2,728
Actually the code of conduct is that bicycles OUGHT to give way to pedestrians on the footpath.

I don't know where they learned that ringing bell means people have to siam them,
Coz they are uneducated, untested and unlicensed ... as well as ungracious. 😏
 

iosnewbie

Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
9,490
Reaction score
2,870
Or do like what we did in the old days - put mirrors on our handle bars so that we can see traffic behind us ;)

Elitist cyclists will hiam those old style side mirrors as ah pek and spoil their aero dynamics. Must wait for Apple to develop next next gen Vision Pro that is as as sleek as those cyclists sunglasses so that rear traffic data can be projected real time for them.
 

One Month Notice

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
14,791
Reaction score
1,633
So your argument is that because they don't pay road tax that cyclist have no right to safety on the road?
If the cyclist value safety. She should not have expose herself to danger by standing in the middle of the road. The jam she created will also endanger other users.

We have too many cases of cyclist not giving due consideration of safety for ALL USERS.

To be entitled to safety on roads, one must first embody it through practice

If cyclist wants to preach the 1.5m rule. The same rule also say to keep left and not hold up vehicle behind. Aka dismount or move aside for vehicle. Dun see them doing it.
 

carey

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
38,408
Reaction score
3,792
Elitist cyclists will hiam those old style side mirrors as ah pek and spoil their aero dynamics. Must wait for Apple to develop next next gen Vision Pro that is as as sleek as those cyclists sunglasses so that rear traffic data can be projected real time for them.
In this case, can I suggest they stick to spinning classes until such a sleek device is invented? ;)
 

sacrificium

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2001
Messages
25,987
Reaction score
3,399
So your argument is that because they don't pay road tax that cyclist have no right to safety on the road?
Argument is that the car overtakes the cyclist in the next lane, not even close to the cyclist. Why is the cyclist making a big fuss out of nothing?
 

sacrificium

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2001
Messages
25,987
Reaction score
3,399
What’s the background of Nicolette Tan Shi-en? How come she can be so outrageous?
Hmm, seems like she might be a lawyer with Gabriel Law Corporation or maybe Tan Peng Chin LLC. Which could explain why she’s so arrogant. Since it might not cost her much to go to court.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top