From 1 January 2025, platform operators are required to deduct CPF contributions from platform workers'

Bumiputera

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
24,098
Reaction score
4,579
I think this implementation means that now platform operators need to pay their own share of the CPF to the platform worker's CPF.

In your example, the 37% is 20% contributed by platform worker himself while the 17% is contributed by the platform operator company. Just like the case for normal employee.
This will make future platform operators more hesitant to operate in Singapore.

Layman analogy is the main contractor had to pay cpf for employees of its subcontractor.
 

woonwoonjiakbeehoon

Master Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2023
Messages
4,402
Reaction score
2,920
Its a positive stance by the gov to offload the gig workers' CPF liabilities.

Cannot always be us tax payers responsible for gig workers' healthcare liabilities when they cannot pay for medical expenses right :mad:
 

Hot_Dog

Master Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
4,331
Reaction score
1,323
I do agree.
But somehow you notice those doing such job people have poor financial planning.
Got money spend.

To be frank if those with good financial planning and think of the future will not do such job leow.
They want flexible job hours, no need see boss face, happy work not happy don't work.
Well moi not gona judge them, ebery person's situation is different, cannot just lump them into huan homogenise group leh.
Also "such" job still a job, and even for ppl that cannot handle a 9-5 job, there ish still a road for them, moi think ish a good thing.
 

grevq80o

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
3,549
Why need
They work no cpf, no mediaave nothing.
Next time use what to buy house or retire.
Actually if Gov dun do this cpf trick, these platform workers next to me can rely on gov to gib hse and retirement... Gov make them cpf, gov smart.. dun want to be burdened. Make them suffer more so than Gov no need to spend so much in the Future
 

sunsetbay

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 3, 2000
Messages
52,727
Reaction score
4,985
Exactly. With sgp being a high cost country. These workers are going to be a burden to their family, themselves and eventually the whole gov will need to feed them

Is there any data that shows the these workers caused burden to their family and will cause the gov to feed them eventually~?

Taxi is one of the longest trade with most didn't contribute to CPF, did taxi drivers caused a burden to the gov~?

What I see is that these gig works are the relief to the gov & society, without these jobs, many will be jobless~ :s22:
 

anchoraz

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2023
Messages
2,391
Reaction score
1,199
Mayb forecast 20yrs back. All work cpf contributed jobs.

Current mayb 50% become grab. Tats y shortfall.
 

C_boliao

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
16,950
Reaction score
4,784
Is there any data that shows the these workers caused burden to their family and will cause the gov to feed them eventually~?

Taxi is one of the longest trade with most didn't contribute to CPF, did taxi drivers caused a burden to the gov~?

What I see is that these gig works are the relief to the gov & society, without these jobs, many will be jobless~ :s22:
Last time houses and food are cheaper with little competition. Still can survive.

Now flooded with all shorts. Houses ath, food at food court easily $5.

If have kids, then how? Insurance, additional tution fees, cca?

Of cos one can say no need, then eventually the child will lose out. Lose out in learning opportunities, pray no sickness to child n family, pray kids is smart and can learn everything online on their own.

If just want to breath and survive, of cos can. But it's just going to very tough
 

Godeau

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
14,424
Reaction score
5,426
This will make future platform operators more hesitant to operate in Singapore.

Layman analogy is the main contractor had to pay cpf for employees of its subcontractor.
Nothing wrong since many of these platforms already taking in a substantial portion of the workers' earnings. So why do they not have to contribute cpf to their employees when companies of other industries, does?
 

Bumiputera

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
24,098
Reaction score
4,579
Nothing wrong since many of these platforms already taking in a substantial portion of the workers' earnings. So why do they not have to contribute cpf to their employees when companies of other industries, does?
Never say it is wrong, is just saying from platform pov, this is opening a can of worm.

Imagine if got the scenario where a company behind a future popular superapp that freelance tuition teacher here uses is ask to pay the cpf for the freelance tuition teacher.

Exciting future, right?
 

Godeau

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
14,424
Reaction score
5,426
Never say it is wrong, is just saying from platform pov, this is opening a can of worm.

Imagine if got the scenario where a company behind a future popular superapp that freelance tuition teacher here uses is ask to pay the cpf for the freelance tuition teacher.

Exciting future, right?
Same thing, why not? It is up the the regulators(if they deemed as such) to draw a line what constitutes a company employee, or a freelancer. Why do some companies get a free ticket to get away with it, and for far too long(not contributing to their employees' cpf contribution)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top