[GE2025] The Workers' Party (WP) Discussion Thread

L

luifd168

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Messages
552
Reaction score
654
priore said:
PAP scared lose minister, argue that lose ministers is very impactful, sky gonna fall ,oh no what to do.

PS says - 2011 George yeo lost. Minster MFA replaced, does it mean MFA cmi? MFA suddenly start malfunctioning? No right? There, u got ur ans.
Click to expand...
Pritam Singh logic fail lah! He says PAP lose George Yeo before, so now lose Gan Kim Yong also can? If your company keep losing senior management, keep losing bosses, you really steady boh? You think the company can keep performing ah? You think investors still confident or not?

First, context damn different sia! 2011 maybe your company stable, lose one boss still can manage lah. Now outside big storm sia! Got trade war like hell, supply chain all kena choke. This time company facing major crisis, you go tell your Chief Operating Officer (GKY as MTI) who handle the most important department and the Deputy CEO (GKY as DPM) to bye bye? Siao ah! You want the whole company to collapse faster is it?

Second, roles different hor! GY was important boss (Foreign Minister), yes. But GKY today is the guy running the core operations (MTI - economy, jobs, trade deals) AND second-in-command (DPM)! You lose this guy during this crisis time, the whole company sure shake like mad lah! Who going to handle the urgent deals? Who going to reassure investors and workers?

Just because last time your company lose one boss then never close shop, doesn't mean can anyhow keep losing key people NOW, especially during crisis! Like last time your company kena small fine, now you want commit major fraud say 'last time also never bankrupt what'? You playing with the company future, playing with everyone's rice bowl leh!

Easy for Pritam to say lah, he like competitor company, of course hope your company lose good bosses then he can benefit mah! But for us workers in the company (us Sinkies lah!), why we want to take such a stupid risk? Losing GKY now is weakening the core leadership when the company needs stability the most.

So ask yourself again lah, you really steady boh if SG keeps losing key ministers like this, especially the MTI(Ministry of Trade and Industry) head during this period? Don't listen to competitor talk then sabotage your own company lah. Think properly!
 
D

DaBaiCai

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
1,431
luifd168 said:
Pritam Singh logic fail lah! He says PAP lose George Yeo before, so now lose Gan Kim Yong also can? If your company keep losing senior management, keep losing bosses, you really steady boh? You think the company can keep performing ah? You think investors still confident or not?

First, context damn different sia! 2011 maybe your company stable, lose one boss still can manage lah. Now outside big storm sia! Got trade war like hell, supply chain all kena choke. This time company facing major crisis, you go tell your Chief Operating Officer (GKY as MTI) who handle the most important department and the Deputy CEO (GKY as DPM) to bye bye? Siao ah! You want the whole company to collapse faster is it?

Second, roles different hor! GY was important boss (Foreign Minister), yes. But GKY today is the guy running the core operations (MTI - economy, jobs, trade deals) AND second-in-command (DPM)! You lose this guy during this crisis time, the whole company sure shake like mad lah! Who going to handle the urgent deals? Who going to reassure investors and workers?

Just because last time your company lose one boss then never close shop, doesn't mean can anyhow keep losing key people NOW, especially during crisis! Like last time your company kena small fine, now you want commit major fraud say 'last time also never bankrupt what'? You playing with the company future, playing with everyone's rice bowl leh!

Easy for Pritam to say lah, he like competitor company, of course hope your company lose good bosses then he can benefit mah! But for us workers in the company (us Sinkies lah!), why we want to take such a stupid risk? Losing GKY now is weakening the core leadership when the company needs stability the most.

So ask yourself again lah, you really steady boh if SG keeps losing key ministers like this, especially the MTI(Ministry of Trade and Industry) head during this period? Don't listen to competitor talk then sabotage your own company lah. Think properly!
Click to expand...
Nice AI generated reply.
 
maniamcool

maniamcool

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2009
Messages
24,650
Reaction score
8,841
luifd168 said:
Pritam Singh logic fail lah! He says PAP lose George Yeo before, so now lose Gan Kim Yong also can? If your company keep losing senior management, keep losing bosses, you really steady boh? You think the company can keep performing ah? You think investors still confident or not?

First, context damn different sia! 2011 maybe your company stable, lose one boss still can manage lah. Now outside big storm sia! Got trade war like hell, supply chain all kena choke. This time company facing major crisis, you go tell your Chief Operating Officer (GKY as MTI) who handle the most important department and the Deputy CEO (GKY as DPM) to bye bye? Siao ah! You want the whole company to collapse faster is it?

Second, roles different hor! GY was important boss (Foreign Minister), yes. But GKY today is the guy running the core operations (MTI - economy, jobs, trade deals) AND second-in-command (DPM)! You lose this guy during this crisis time, the whole company sure shake like mad lah! Who going to handle the urgent deals? Who going to reassure investors and workers?

Just because last time your company lose one boss then never close shop, doesn't mean can anyhow keep losing key people NOW, especially during crisis! Like last time your company kena small fine, now you want commit major fraud say 'last time also never bankrupt what'? You playing with the company future, playing with everyone's rice bowl leh!

Easy for Pritam to say lah, he like competitor company, of course hope your company lose good bosses then he can benefit mah! But for us workers in the company (us Sinkies lah!), why we want to take such a stupid risk? Losing GKY now is weakening the core leadership when the company needs stability the most.

So ask yourself again lah, you really steady boh if SG keeps losing key ministers like this, especially the MTI(Ministry of Trade and Industry) head during this period? Don't listen to competitor talk then sabotage your own company lah. Think properly!
Click to expand...
That’s a lot of words.

You must have never worked in big company before.

senior management changes is healthy for any large organisation.
 
kmkimlo

kmkimlo

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 13, 2003
Messages
14,037
Reaction score
1,676
luifd168 said:
Pritam Singh logic fail lah! He says PAP lose George Yeo before, so now lose Gan Kim Yong also can? If your company keep losing senior management, keep losing bosses, you really steady boh? You think the company can keep performing ah? You think investors still confident or not?

First, context damn different sia! 2011 maybe your company stable, lose one boss still can manage lah. Now outside big storm sia! Got trade war like hell, supply chain all kena choke. This time company facing major crisis, you go tell your Chief Operating Officer (GKY as MTI) who handle the most important department and the Deputy CEO (GKY as DPM) to bye bye? Siao ah! You want the whole company to collapse faster is it?

Second, roles different hor! GY was important boss (Foreign Minister), yes. But GKY today is the guy running the core operations (MTI - economy, jobs, trade deals) AND second-in-command (DPM)! You lose this guy during this crisis time, the whole company sure shake like mad lah! Who going to handle the urgent deals? Who going to reassure investors and workers?

Just because last time your company lose one boss then never close shop, doesn't mean can anyhow keep losing key people NOW, especially during crisis! Like last time your company kena small fine, now you want commit major fraud say 'last time also never bankrupt what'? You playing with the company future, playing with everyone's rice bowl leh!

Easy for Pritam to say lah, he like competitor company, of course hope your company lose good bosses then he can benefit mah! But for us workers in the company (us Sinkies lah!), why we want to take such a stupid risk? Losing GKY now is weakening the core leadership when the company needs stability the most.

So ask yourself again lah, you really steady boh if SG keeps losing key ministers like this, especially the MTI(Ministry of Trade and Industry) head during this period? Don't listen to competitor talk then sabotage your own company lah. Think properly!
Click to expand...

actually without the Minister.. the PS and other 3 DS + so many other DG and Directors + teams are still be working., so please do not do unnecessary fearmongering .

https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Images/MTI-Org-Chart-April-2025.jpg
 
K

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,544
Reaction score
3,773
kmkimlo said:
actually without the Minister.. the PS and other 3 DS + so many other DG and Directors + teams are still be working., so please do not do unnecessary fearmongering .

https://www.mti.gov.sg/-/media/MTI/Images/MTI-Org-Chart-April-2025.jpg
Click to expand...
If they really that important in the 1st place, why put them in Punggol GRC?

https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/f...kim-yong-recalls-when-he-was-offered-dpm-role

In the 1st place, GKY wanted to retire but LW purposely put him there to guard against WP.
 
jeffprobst

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,657
Reaction score
12,199
think most of those newbie are tired already. their facial and speech, no strength. lol.
 
jeffprobst

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
86,657
Reaction score
12,199
You must log in or register to reply here.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top