[BREAKING] Trump announces 100% tariff on branded or patented pharmaceutical imports from Oct 1

firebear

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,182
Reaction score
339
It is very interesting how Trump words it " branded or patented"....In other words, generic drugs is free flow and no tariffs.....He is telling the big pharmas to agar agar be more social conscious in their pricing....

It is also interesting that those companies that already has plants in the US are all exempted. In other words, he is telling the big pharmas as long you agar agar give some jobs in America by opening a plant no matter how small, your offshore manufacturing I dun touch.


This move is also sibei friendly to Singapore. To think our PM still KPKB Trump....
well said, here, only you see this...
(he need those impt medicine to be fully accessable at all times )
 

Newtype_com

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
16,602
Reaction score
4,570
Task Force Man

Has

Failed Spectacularly

NEL / Punggol MRT has also consistently breakdown
 

wongminmin

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2014
Messages
33,067
Reaction score
17,513
  • 3 to 5 years for a standard pharmaceutical plant.
  • 5 to 7 years if it’s highly complex (e.g., biologics, vaccines).


sg take about 4+ years to setup pharmaceutical plant.
Let's see how trump build his pharmaceutical industry @_@
the question is whether ang mo like to wear jumpsuit. :censored:
 

GreatPumpkin

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
21,706
If you think about it, the actual dollars and cents impacted.

For pharmaceutical, the cost of production is likely very low and margin very thick. It's the R&D that is expensive. A levy of 100 pct on a few cents won't be great to the producers. They can't tax on R&D and R&D cost can still be used to reduce taxes.

Those pharmaceutical choose to produce here is likely due to other political, operation or trading reasons rather than lowering production cost. If that's the purpose, they could have done it in other cheaper places, to run. :o

The greatest loser will be the American residents, because the pharmaceutical will pass the cost and they will use the opportunity to jack up the price higher. It won't be few cents of increase, they will use the opportunity to increase by a bigger margin.

Even if the pharmaceutical wanna entertain Donald trump and pull operations back. They probably still produce it in the other countries, send the processed material to USA to do packaging. Produced in USA has a broad definition, it can be just semi produced or packaged there. :o

Tldr: Likely nothing to worry but I'm more worried that PAP, like those pharmaceutical companies, use the opportunity to jack up prices or create some indirect taxes. :(
Need to consider the supply chain.

Let's say an item sells for $90 at the pharmacy.

Actual costs to make is maybe $2 but manufacturer will sell to distributor for $30 then distributor flip to pharmacy for $60.

So if the declared value at export is $30, then now distributor have to pay $60 after tariff.

So distributor now flip to pharmacy ar $90 and pharmacy sell at $120.

Consumer won't foot the full 100% but it still hurts.

They can package in USA but iirc, bulk product, bottles and packaging will all kena tariff as well. Then all their cheap labour kena scared off by ICE.
 

AlmightyOnes

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2010
Messages
26,063
Reaction score
15,136
trump is the best leader. hope he becomes president forever
200.gif
 

Philipkee

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
26,954
Reaction score
15,919
Building a pharma factory takes many years.

Just wayang a bit, buy some cheap land and slow walk the process until somebody is out of office.
Might not work. Other than trump, it’s not common for another president to turn back the predecessor’s policies. Like I read after winning the presidency, Biden didn’t reverse any tariff imposed by trump. So even if democrats win the presidency, I doubt anything will be reversed. Cos if succeed, the sitting president gets the credit. If it fails, the previous president gets the blame
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
Big Pharma kenna screwed by Trump.
it expected, they tried to screw trump during his 2 election which he lose.

he wanted to release the vacinne, but the pharma refuse,
but they release it immediately after trump lose a indirectly support democrates,
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
Might not work. Other than trump, it’s not common for another president to turn back the predecessor’s policies. Like I read after winning the presidency, Biden didn’t reverse any tariff imposed by trump. So even if democrats win the presidency, I doubt anything will be reversed. Cos if succeed, the sitting president gets the credit. If it fails, the previous president gets the blame
it becasue the common population wanted the jobs back and punish some countries.
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
Revamp the education system to create our own startups that will become the future MNCs.
The current education system is wasting years of time to train students to work for others. Zero integration with starting own companies. This includes the two NS years.
the last minister see people no up, remember creative,
they only want to so call degree holder to start up.
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
At this point the best way is to start going towards China and allowing them to learn these knowledge, then Trump will be the one panicking.
they wun
china already screw them.
ask them to share tech, and then china will fund start up to complete with the foreign mmc,

u see what happen to LG and other japan brands.
like toshiba, panasonic jvc, hitachi,
all almost gone.
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
Those that don't like him are just waiting for his term to finish. But its not the first day of his crazy tariff. Later he will most likely change again and then the US court will say it's illegal blah blah blah.
if the next president from same price, it likely to carry on his policy
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
If you think about it, the actual dollars and cents impacted.

For pharmaceutical, the cost of production is likely very low and margin very thick. It's the R&D that is expensive. A levy of 100 pct on a few cents won't be great to the producers. They can't tax on R&D and R&D cost can still be used to reduce taxes.

Those pharmaceutical choose to produce here is likely due to other political, operation or trading reasons rather than lowering production cost. If that's the purpose, they could have done it in other cheaper places, to run. :o

The greatest loser will be the American residents, because the pharmaceutical will pass the cost and they will use the opportunity to jack up the price higher. It won't be few cents of increase, they will use the opportunity to increase by a bigger margin.

Even if the pharmaceutical wanna entertain Donald trump and pull operations back. They probably still produce it in the other countries, send the processed material to USA to do packaging. Produced in USA has a broad definition, it can be just semi produced or packaged there. :o

Tldr: Likely nothing to worry but I'm more worried that PAP, like those pharmaceutical companies, use the opportunity to jack up prices or create some indirect taxes. :(
very hard, country of orgin, they need to indicate material cost from where.
 

johnsonheng

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2002
Messages
52,752
Reaction score
4,730
I dunno wat are the high earnings now? 500%? 800%? 1000%? 2000%? or more. So after that tariff still got 400%, 700%, 900%, 1900% or more.. and also the cost pass to their consumers... mayb jus earn lesser nia
one pill maybe less than 1 dollars cents but sell for 70- usd.
 

kodomo80

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
6,313
Reaction score
2,345
if the next president from same price, it likely to carry on his policy
after his first scare of the initial tariff, now other countries are used to his scare tactics and also forming their own agreement without US. US is already becoming unpredictable, other countries can only try to find other alternatives.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top