Actually, no.
you are not supposed to loiter within the 200m but the law never says u cannot be there or even be inside the polling area
So the accusation and proof must be of loitering within the 200 m boundary but the only proof opposition had was of the ministers inside the polling area and of cos that was not against the law per se.
You can’t say cannot be there in the boundary cos the law only says cannot loiter there and not cannot be there at all
You can’t say cannot be in the polling area cos the law never says cannot
you can’t say common sense la if you can loiter in the polling area u surely must have loitered in the boundary also cos the law requires evidence of that also and no one gave evidence of them loitering in the boundary
of cos this as before social media now probably a lot of GVGT so won’t happen again
contested election
After the election, the WP candidates at Cheng San GRC filed police reports against the PAP over the presence of PAP ministers within the precinct of polling stations in Cheng San GRC,
[7] citing the violation of two sections of the Parliamentary Elections Act:
- Section 82(1)(d): "No person shall wait outside any polling station on polling day, except for the purpose of gaining entry to the polling station to cast his vote".
- Section 82(1)(e): "No person shall loiter in any street or public place within a radius of 200 metres of any polling station on polling day."
Their complaints were not prosecuted by the police, on the advice of the
Attorney-General (AG)
Chan Sek Keong.
[8] The Attorney-General, in his letter to the Minister of Law, interpreted the statute as being "irrelevant to people" within the polling station, and that remaining within the polling station itself, as opposed to being within a perimeter of 200 meters from the external walls of the polling station, was not an offence.
[9] He added that "the possibility of a person inside a polling station influencing or intimidating voters in the presence of the presiding officer and his officials, the polling agents etc was considered so remote that it was discounted by the Act."
[10]
The WP questioned whether the AG was suggesting that it was acceptable for people to enter and loiter on the grounds of the polling station rather than outside it, and subsequently renewed its call for the establishment of an independent
election commission to ensure fair play in the conduct of elections in Singapore.
[11]