2023 Banking Crisis

DevilPlate

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
12,252
Reaction score
5,165
Of course la. If I am the CEO, I also buy now. Later any issue I can exit first mah. By the time I exit, too late for retail investors. See those clowns who encourage all these crypto. They didn’t get burn, their supporters got burnt. 😆
Clowns = Ytuber?
They might do crypto videos but they never buy also u duno.
I just look at their data presented (also need to verify) and ignore their opinions.

CEO yes, they run road first like SVB CEO and management staff.
 

elvintay07

Suspended
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Messages
12,370
Reaction score
4,443
Clowns = Ytuber?
They might do crypto videos but they never buy also u duno.
I just look at their data presented (also need to verify) and ignore their opinions.

CEO yes, they run road first like SVB CEO and management staff.
They don’t run first then I worry. 😆
 

elvintay07

Suspended
Joined
Jan 4, 2022
Messages
12,370
Reaction score
4,443
Don't know how many SVB clients will stick with the bank. For me, I would say thank you FDIC, withdrawal all my savings and park it somewhere else.
If people don’t do that then I worry. Of course do that is better. Else how to have slim chance to make JP Morgan, Bank of America bankrupt. 😆
 

final1

Master Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
4,827
Reaction score
986
I did already say on Monday.
"Does it portend bigger things to come?"
Credit Suisse next to go?

The FED and the Treasury have been doing a good job? Well-done?
Following textbook economics is a job well-done?
Bailing out depositors AFTER THE FACT is a good idea?
I really laugh till my sides ache.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,545
Reaction score
5,569
Now that's news! I can't remember a time when stockholders ranked ahead of bondholders in a distressed, government brokered acquisition like this, but here we are.

Are you holding low or medium ranking bank bonds? A lot of Singaporeans are. I'd take a fresh look at your bond portfolio and reassess its risk profile in light of this zeroing out of Credit Suisse's AT1 bonds. If the Swiss National Bank can do it then it's probably precedent for other central banks.
 

final1

Master Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
4,827
Reaction score
986
US futures still red red red after credit suisse 'rescue'.
lmao. Refer to post #144 and the one before that.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,545
Reaction score
5,569
US futures still red red red after credit suisse 'rescue'.
lmao. Refer to post #144 and the one before that.
S&P 500 futures are pointing to a ~0.50% fall in that index at market open. That's a perfectly ordinary and boring day on Wall Street.

Are you watching CNBC by any chance? I'd turn off the financial p**n. It's better for your health and wealth.
But it is not the entire bondholders who are wiped out right? It is only the AT1 issue that is gone
I'm not sure, but I believe you're correct. Even so it looks to me like there are many Credit Suisse bondholders who still want to get rid of their bonds at desperation prices across the board. That might be because there are portfolio managers who now have no choice based on their funds' investment rules.

If you're really brave then you might consider buying some of these non-AT1 distressed Credit Suisse bonds. I'm not that brave.
 

boringLife-

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
10,009
Reaction score
1,024

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
13,089
Reaction score
4,054
in America you got no-win no-fee lawyers, so bondholders got nothing to lose since written down to 0$ :s13:
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,545
Reaction score
5,569
in America you got no-win no-fee lawyers, so bondholders got nothing to lose since written down to 0$ :s13:
We don’t know what the arrangement will be between possible plaintiffs and their legal representatives, but that’s not really it. The potential for recovery of even a small fraction of US$17 billion is more than ample incentive here. Circa US$3.2 billion is on the table at least since that’s what stockholders are supposed to get. Would you pay for a lawyer if you had a 10% chance of getting US$3.2 billion? I think I would if I could afford it. These plaintiffs presumably can.

Some holders of Argentina’s sovereign debt won in court. It can happen. It doesn’t mean these bondholders will, but this situation seems to be unprecedented. I don’t think there’s ever been another case like this where stockholders outranked bondholders. The prospective plaintiffs have novelty in their favor.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top