only in EDMW is everything so expensive in SgHow else would the elderly men be able to spend their CDC vouchers on wellness?
Should be got demand that's why the shops can open more and more instead of fnb close and close right?
only in EDMW is everything so expensive in SgHow else would the elderly men be able to spend their CDC vouchers on wellness?
Should be got demand that's why the shops can open more and more instead of fnb close and close right?
Shop owners should have due diligence to ensure that the tenant is not operating illegally.
Same like flat rental too. If shop/home owner don't check their owned store/home how? Expect public to keep checking and expose but the owner is the one who keeps benefit cuz collecting the rental regardless the tenant is breaking the law or not?
Kym?
In ur copy and pasted section also mention that "The shop owners may then find new business owners of similar trade to let their shops to, he added.
“It is therefore not so straightforward to address the issue, which is why it has been such a longstanding problem. But enough is enough,” said Mr Foo."
So shop owner should be punished for (repeated) illegal activities that are carried out in their rented out store for failing to do the necessary due diligence.
Double kym?
Same like housing rental? Would u want neighbours who keeps constantly rented out their flat to people or group who conducted illegal activities right... they can keep collect the rental monies from criminals but then the surrounding people suffer and be affected because they don't do the check and due diligence?
Triple kym?
next time my boss scold me , i will say Enough is Enough.
can?
Funnythis kind of bo liao thing they want to action
actual issues affecting people daily livelihood like public transport failures and cost of living concerns
you die your business
Did u use ChatGPT or Gemini?I understand you're frustrated with the idea that property owners might not be held responsible for illegal activities happening on their premises. This is a really complex issue, and your point about owners benefiting while the community suffers is a strong one.
Your proposal that property owners should be punished for repeated illegal activities on their premises due to a lack of due diligence is a very interesting legal argument. From a legal perspective, your reasoning touches on the concept of vicarious liability, where one person is held responsible for the actions or omissions of another. While this concept is more common in employer-employee relationships, applying it to a landlord-tenant situation raises some fascinating points.
You mentioned Mr. Foo's statement: "The shop owners may then find new business owners of similar trade to let their shops to, he added. 'It is therefore not so straightforward to address the issue, which is why it has been such a longstanding problem. But enough is enough,' said Mr. Foo." . This part highlights the core difficulty—it's hard to hold owners accountable when they can simply replace a problematic tenant. This cycle, as you pointed out, allows owners to collect rent while the illegal activities, and the problems they cause, continue. The law often struggles to keep up with these kinds of loopholes, which is why your argument for stricter accountability is so compelling.
However sadly, the law may not currently support this.
only in EDMW is everything so expensive in Sg
Maybe bad past experience. No special offer‘Enough is enough’: MP vows refresh of Tanjong Pagar Plaza amid concerns over vice activities
Vice activities happens in every cities what!
Relax lah!
Old people need to massage there to prevent prostate cancerWhats wrong with seeking health and wellness services?
Got proof they doing vice? No proof mean 默虚有罪Massage parlours are also serving daily needs of some residents of the area.
Mr Foo said in his Facebook post that businesses engaging in vice activities cast a bad light on the shopping centre.
“When the reputation of TPP is affected, it will affect the overall business viability of the other tenants, which in turn will affect the residents who depend on this mall to meet their daily needs,” he said.
How about china Town areas and gerylang areas ?can the MP also look at Beo Crescent, Havelock region? so many hair salon and dubious spa, opening one by one.
This is AI reply confirmedI understand you're frustrated with the idea that property owners might not be held responsible for illegal activities happening on their premises. This is a really complex issue, and your point about owners benefiting while the community suffers is a strong one.
Your proposal that property owners should be punished for repeated illegal activities on their premises due to a lack of due diligence is a very interesting legal argument. From a legal perspective, your reasoning touches on the concept of vicarious liability, where one person is held responsible for the actions or omissions of another. While this concept is more common in employer-employee relationships, applying it to a landlord-tenant situation raises some fascinating points.
You mentioned Mr. Foo's statement: "The shop owners may then find new business owners of similar trade to let their shops to, he added. 'It is therefore not so straightforward to address the issue, which is why it has been such a longstanding problem. But enough is enough,' said Mr. Foo." . This part highlights the core difficulty—it's hard to hold owners accountable when they can simply replace a problematic tenant. This cycle, as you pointed out, allows owners to collect rent while the illegal activities, and the problems they cause, continue. The law often struggles to keep up with these kinds of loopholes, which is why your argument for stricter accountability is so compelling.
However sadly, the law may not currently support this.