I think I need to boost my income growth ? Looking at the stock market now with all the "through the roof" kind of stock value, I'm afraid to enter now.
Hmm, OK, I realize I might not have been clear enough. Let me try again.
"Income" and "growth" are opposites. When you build a portfolio, you can either focus on capital gains (having the value of the shares grow) or on income (getting dividends from the portfolio); you can't do both, because stocks with high income tend to have low capital gains. (SG-REITS are the absolute best example of this - they pay high yields but the share price performance tends to be atrocious, especially when you factor in the regular dilutive capital calls that they love to make).
Most people think they want income from their investments, but here's the thing: most people
already get income from their jobs. The only people who actually need income are retired folks, or other folks who don't have steady income. Folks who chase income when they don't need it are giving up the opportunity for long-term capital growth.
It sounds like you have a job that gives you income to live off, so my point is that you don't need to chase income in your investment portfolio. Those REITS and that dividend-chasing are keeping you down.
I'll talk more about "through the roof" and valuation later.
I think I will be consistent to put in 120 per day also to cut my expenses.
That's a great start: that's $30k/yr (assuming you work 250 days/year), and that'll get you a big chunk of the way to $500k in eight years. This is what I was saying: one of the best ways to accelerate your portfolio is to earn more, so that you have more to invest in the first place.
1. We do not want the 30 percent withholding tax
2. 40 percent estate duty tax for non US domicile
3. Exchange rate risk. Who knows if US dollar is gonna stay strong against SGD
1. You don't pay the 30% WHT if you buy Irish-domiciled ETFs like IWDA or CSPX. This is a solved problem.
2. Again, if you buy Irish-domiciled ETFs, there is no estate duty for Singaporean residents.
3. Yes, that's true: who knows? That's why smart investors diversify their portfolio between Singaporean and overseas assets.
So I understand that you're concerned by the way that the market looks expensive, and that's normal. But it doesn't change the fact that the best, most reliable way to get to your goal (a $500k portfolio in eight years' time) is to, firstly, earn more; and secondly, invest that extra employment income in a diversified portfolio. Eight years is a long time, and that's plenty of time to ride out any potential downturns in the market.
Warren buffet said
Invest in things that we understand and those that as use daily. To invest in high growth stock, yes the potential upside is high but I don't really see the business in my day to day life.
I've got a couple of things here that I'd like you to challenge yourself with.
Firstly, here's something to chew on: who made the computer (or the phone) that you're typing this on (GOOG, +70% YTD; INTC +100% YTD, AMD +80% YTD)? Was your hard disk made by Western Digital (+260% YTD) or Seagate (+220% YTD)? Do you own a Coach or Kate Spade bag (Tapestry, the parent of both brands, is up 67% YTD)? Have you watched
Hacks* or
Heated Rivalry (Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns HBO, is +127% YTD)? These names might not immediately come to mind, but you absolutely interact with them all day every day.
But more broadly, unless you run an insurance company, you don't need to invest like Warren Buffett: you need to invest like
you. And your needs are different from Uncle Wozza's - for example, he needs regular cashflow to pay out on insurance policies, but you don't need cashflow from your portfolio until you retire. So it wouldn't make sense for you to invest like Warren Buffett.
*and if you haven't watched
Hacks, you absolutely should: it's hysterically funny.