Please log in and verify your age to view this post. Why?
I'm the person who suggested using ai.I still can't see who told TS to ask ai.
I bought them because I'm not even exposed to investing during my mid twenties ....it believed the myth that my money has to be handled by an expert back then....so I had those in my portfolio which are considered legacyhmm, buying ut is investing. u ans how u bought them but I was asking "why".
u r the most vulnerable type of "investor", buying products when introduced. not knowing exactly what u r buying, the risks involved. when u cross the road, don't play hp or blindly follow the ppl in front. look out for traffic lights and the cars.
I have 3 ut: Mari invest income, Mari invest gold and schroder Asian growth. i bought them because got promo. hehe
even with an "expert" helping u in investing, u have to do your homework or i will treat it as gambling, and gambling often leads to losing money.I bought them because I'm not even exposed to investing during my mid twenties ....it believed the myth that my money has to be handled by an expert back then....so I had those in my portfolio which are considered legacy
Good thing that I had some of it posted here and I get to know my expense ratio is so high for that first Sientier fund that I hold for 10 over years
Probably they changed SGD to USD.OK. It looks reasonable in that case, although I'm not sure what currency conversion rate they apply.
I agreed we can't take history and expect the future to be the same.ISAC and other global stock index funds already include lots of U.S. listed stocks — a huge percentage, actually. Why would you overweight U.S. listed stocks when you're retiring in Indonesia? The only reason I can think of is that you're predicting that U.S. listed stocks (mid-cap and larger) will outperform non-U.S. listed stocks going forward. I don't think you should be making predictions like that. I have no idea whether U.S. listed stocks will outperform non-U.S. listed stocks going forward, and I suggest neither do you.
"Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results." Moreover, non-U.S. listed stocks have outperformed U.S. listed stocks lately.
ai is a great tool if use correctly. i have been using it.I'm the person who suggested using ai.
That is what I paid for not knowing what I do and trusting the so called expert.even with an "expert" helping u in investing, u have to do your homework or i will treat it as gambling, and gambling often leads to losing money.
your net profit is more impt than the expense ratio. eg. another ut has lower expense ratio but if its profit is low or even at loss, then the First Sentier ut is better.
1)
UOB unit Trust east spring investment worth 5,905 down from 10,300 which is a lost
so for east spring ut, u still having a net gain of $2k or 20% if u include div right? if they are making money, then u should keep them. no point chasing after the "best" investment.That is what I paid for not knowing what I do and trusting the so called expert.
My Sientier First apparently made me a 80 percent growth and UOB that one although I'm down 40 percent but dividend payout from it is 60 percent of what I initially put in.
So I just treat like I put it in cash /FD or something although it can perform better if I know the skill earlier
OK, that's a global stock index fund, not an S&P 500 Index fund.I am actually also into this Jack boggle investment strategy that is we don't try to beat the market, we buy the entire market.
I made 2Kso for east spring ut, u still having a net gain of $2k or 20% if u include div right? if they are making money, then u should keep them. no point chasing after the "best" investment.
OK, that's a global stock index fund, not an S&P 500 Index fund.
if u spent $10k and gain $2k, it is 20%.I made 2K
Not 20 percent !
Lol !!
If I make 20 percent I won't make a noise..
I'm the person who suggested using ai.
Depends how long I get to get this 2,000 right ?if u spent $10k and gain $2k, it is 20%.
60% div - 40% capital loss = 20% net profit
it is still 20% profit or 2% pa yield if that is your concern.Depends how long I get to get this 2,000 right ?
I on this for say 10 years .....
I think the problem a lot of people don't know is that "experts" are highly overrated.I bought them because I'm not even exposed to investing during my mid twenties ....it believed the myth that my money has to be handled by an expert back then....so I had those in my portfolio which are considered legacy
I think the problem a lot of people don't know is that "experts" are highly overrated.
If they were really that good, they would be borrowing (leverage) and investing using their own money.
These "experts" don't have aligned interests. They earn commission no matter how badly your portfolio does. Their interest is in selling you their products, no matter how bad they are, so that they earn that commission.
To hold these funds
Those expenses ratios will go to these financial "guru" ?
How does it work?
I can't understand
I had that FA from IPP
Ask me to sell funds that she recommend 2 years before and later cited they underperformed and ask me to switch fund .