
各位先生小姐仔細看囉! 板子上面有四個 1uf/50V的jamicon電解電容, 我第一次知道這個電容時, 嘔出了幾十兩血出來....
您知道它是何用途嗎? 答案是~~~~~~~~
交連電容
是的, 您我花了一萬多元買的喇叭, 居然是用這種貨色當交連電容!!
Acoustic energy你好樣的!!!
廠機呀廠機, 我真是摸不透你呀.....

Anyone know what kind of speakers would be suitable to serve as a third (additional) speaker for the Aego-M system apart from the original satellite speakers from AE?
By the way, did any of you try the 3.1 setup/configuration?
can i ask does aego m have headphone jack? it seems the hole on the sub is for input???
of course sub is for input la?
im jus asking the hole jus below the volume knob is it for input or for headphone jack?
That's for line out. The Aego-M do not have headphone jack.
That's for line out. The Aego-M do not have headphone jack.

i'm using my laptop soundcard (macbook pro) and it sounds great.Hi all,
I bought a pair of Aego M speakers today at SLS. At CE where they demo-ed their own set, it sounded really crisp and melodious.
Now back at home, I fixed it up to my computer. Following whatever little instructions there was on a singular piece of paper, the setup seemed simple.
However, it sounded rather...hollow. Not even better than my old pair of Altec Lansing speakers. Granted my soundcard is generic from Dell, and CE probably used some mad connecting silver cables costing $1k(I'm using stock), it still should be a significant improvement, shouldn't it?
There also seemed to be some slight crackling sound when the beats are heavy.
Questions:
1. Am I doing something wrong here with setup or otherwise?
2. What is the switch for central input meant for? Is it supposed to be at option Yes or No?
3. How can I improve the sound quality (without buying other stuff hopefully) ?
Thanks.
Many, many people (I daresay 99.9%; yes, that's 3 nines) will not be able to distinguish a properly encoded (read: LAME 3.98 at -V 2; bitrate range 170-230 kbps) mp3 file from the original CD track, unless they're sensitive to pre-echo.Another bad point is even 320KBS mp3 is going to sound lifeless on the AegoM..
Man, it kinda hurts to see current prices after having paid 360 for it over a year ago.
Many, many people (I daresay 99.9%; yes, that's 3 nines) will not be able to distinguish a properly encoded (read: LAME 3.98 at -V 2; bitrate range 170-230 kbps) mp3 file from the original CD track, unless they're sensitive to pre-echo.
You must be referring to those crappy ones downloaded off eMule or Limewire or Kazaa.

nope.. those track ripped from CD.. and compare with the audio CD.. i can hear a differents.. The CD sound so much lively and details.. may be i am the 0.001% of the population..![]()
