Air purifier?

Status
Not open for further replies.

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
Pathogens On A Plane: How To Stay Healthy In Flight


From Ebola in West Africa to chikungunya in the Caribbean, the world has had plenty of strange — and scary — outbreaks this year.

Some pathogens have even landed in the U.S. Just a few months ago, two men boarded planes in Saudi Arabia and brought a new, deadly virus from the Middle East to Florida and Indiana.

Nobody along the way caught Middle East respiratory syndrome. But all of these plane-hopping pathogens got us wondering: How easily do bacteria and viruses spread on commercial jets? And is there anything we can do to cut our risk?

Microbiologist James Barbaree and his team at Auburn University have been trying a few simple experiments to figure out the first question.

The airlines gave the scientists parts on commercial jets where spread might take place — a steel toilet button, the rubber armrest, the plastic tray table and, of course, "the seat pocket in front of you."

Barbaree and his team sterilized the surfaces and then painted on two dangerous microbes: the antibiotic-resistant superbug MRSA and E. coli O157, which will give you an unforgettable case of diarrhea.

Several days later, the microbes were still happily thriving on the plane parts. E. coli survived about four days. MRSA lasted at least a week, the team reported at a scientific meeting in May.

Such hardiness is common for MRSA and E. coli, Barbaree says. "I'm not surprised at all the bacteria survived so long on the surfaces," he says. "MRSA has been tested on other surfaces. And in one case, it lasted over a year."

In general, the bacteria tended to stick on the plane surfaces instead of hopping onto a pig skin — an experimental proxy for a traveler's hand. But some of the bugs did make the jump from the plane onto the fake hand.

If you're going to pick up a pathogen on an intercontinental flight, it will probably be one hanging out on your seat or another surface, says Dr. Mark Gendreau, who specializes in aviation medicine at Lahey Medical Center in Peabody, Mass.

"When you look at most infectious diseases, the overwhelming majority are transmitted when you touch a contaminated surface," he says. "You grab the door knob of the airplane bathroom, and then touch your eyes, nose or mouth."

"But we're not all doomed to get sick after a plane flight," Gendreau says. "You can change behaviors when you're traveling and substantially reduce the risk of catching anything."

First off, keep your hands microbe-free. "I recommend bringing aboard a sanitizing gel with 60 percent alcohol," he says. "Before you eat or drink, sanitize your hand."

And don't forget to use the sanitizer after you wash your hands in the bathroom's sink, Gendreau recommends. The water in airplanes has a dirty track record.

In 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency found high levels of fecal bacteria in the drinking water of 15 of the 327 planes it tested. Then in 2009, the agency set forth new guidelines for airlines for testing their water. Now the EPA says that water on the airplane is safe to drink if you don't have a suppressed immune system.

But Gendreau still wouldn't risk it. He wouldn't even brush his teeth with the water in an airplane bathroom. "I use bottled water," he says.

Of course, not all pathogens live in water or on surfaces. Many, such as the measles and tuberculosis, hang out in the air. Commercial jetliners recycle about 50 percent of the cabin air. So if a sick passenger is sneezing in first class, will his viral-packed air eventually reach you in the back of the plane?


Not likely, Gendreau says. Airplanes have high-tech air filters that remove more than 99 percent of dust and microbes from the air, he says. "And the ventilation is compartmentalized. So the air circulates only in part of the cabin."

But if you're unlucky and are sitting close to the sick passenger, then a flu-packed sneeze may find your lungs before it finds the filter.

Several studies have looked at how airborne diseases, such as TB and severe acute respiratory syndrome, move about on planes. For TB, the conclusions have been consistent: When you sit within two rows of someone infected with TB and the flight is longer than eight hours, there's a chance you could catch disease.

But the size of this "transmission zone" depends on the specific pathogen.

Take SARS, for instance. Back in 2003, a 72-year-old man boarded a plane from Hong Kong to Beijing. He had a fever on the flight. And when he got to mainland China, he was hospitalized. About a week later, the man died of SARS.

During the three-hour flight, he had infected 22 other passengers with the virus. About half of those people were sitting within three rows of the ill man. But even passengers seven rows in front of him caught the deadly virus.

Don't fear, Gendreau says. There's even a way to protect yourself from these airborne pathogens: Take advantage of that vent above your head.

"Set your ventilation at low or medium," he says. "Then position it so you can draw an imaginary line of current right in front of your head. I put my hands on my lap so I can feel the current — so I know it's properly positioned."

Then if something infectious is floating in your personal space, he says, that air from the vent will create enough current to knock it away. And you'll be more likely to go home healthy.
 

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
Last edited:

Asakura

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2004
Messages
59,257
Reaction score
576
people who bother reading this thread, will know by now there's ample knowledge shared regarding ionizer, ozone and purifiers with ability to turn it off or within low levels.
 

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
http://theconversation.com/indonesia-at-risk-from-huge-fires-because-of-el-nino-43072

June 17, 2015 12.32am AEST
Indonesia at risk from huge fires because of El Niño

In 1997-98, extremely dry El Niño conditions in Indonesia kicked off a wave of large–scale uncontrolled burning, destroying about five million hectares of tropical forest (equivalent to seven million football fields). Much of the burning occurred in carbon-rich peatland forests and continued in two phases from July 1997 until March 1998, releasing vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, and huge clouds of smoke and haze across the region.

Present conditions in the Pacific Ocean are similar to what they were in mid-1997. El Niño is set to strengthen, and seasonal weather prediction models point towards this being an exceptionally dry season. Indonesia and its neighbours should be worried.

In order to predict, and hopefully prevent, such fires in the future, we’ve looked at how far in advance they can be anticipated using a seasonal weather prediction model.

Deforestation, peat drainage and El Niño

During the dry season, numerous fires occur in Indonesia’s peatland forests, particularly in the southern region of Kalimantan and eastern Sumatra. Although some rain falls during a normal dry season, it is sporadic, leaving many windows of opportunity for burning.

Most of these fires are deliberately lit to clear rainforest to establish oil palm and Acacia pulp and paper plantations. Fire spread is enhanced by the increased availability of combustible material, notably, woody debris as a result of wasteful logging practices, and the widespread practice of draining peatlands.

When El Niño strikes, however, the situation changes drastically. During strong El Niño episodes, almost no rain falls during the dry season and the monsoon is delayed. So in areas where peatlands have been degraded by logging and draining, fires ignite easily and once started, the peat is so dry that fires escape underground, and cannot be put out until after the monsoon reappears.

At their worst, the fires have enormous impacts on carbon emissions, regional haze production, biodiversity, and the economy, and are recognised as a serious health risk in Indonesia as well as neighbouring Singapore and Malaysia. The fires are a major threat to the remaining orangutans who live in the forests – the Bornean orangutan is rated endangered, and the Sumatran orangutan is critically endangered. During past El Niño years, around one gigatonne of carbon was emitted from peatland forest fires, equivalent to about 10% of annual global fossil fuel emissions, and regional haze from such fires has caused major disruptions to air traffic in nearby Singapore and Kuala Lumpur.

Sea surface temperatures from the vast array of sea buoys established across the Pacific Ocean plus other important meteorological data are now telling us that El Niño conditions are already in place. Furthermore, most seasonal weather prediction models, which are driven by observed SSTs, predict El Niño will strengthen over the coming months. This means the upcoming dry season in Indonesia will probably be much drier than usual, and the fires worse.

Probability rainfall forecasts for Asia for the periods: June-July-August 2015 (top) and September-October-November 2015 (bottom).

June-July-August 2015
image-20150616-5854-1si00of.gif


September-October-November 2015
image-20150616-5825-pu2u7.gif


image-20150616-5854-zqhxam.gif
 
Last edited:

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
Advisories


Warm Days And Thundery Showers In Second Half Of June




Sumatra squalls and slightly hazy conditions also expected on few mornings

Singapore, 16 June 2015 – Southwest Monsoon conditions are expected to persist for rest of June 2015, and the low level winds are forecast to blow predominantly from the southeast or southwest.

2 As compared to the first half of June 2015, the second fortnight of June 2015 could experience fewer rain days. Short-duration thundery showers due to strong solar heating of land areas are likely on three to five days, mostly in the late morning and early afternoon. In addition, thundery showers with gusty winds due to ‘Sumatra’ squalls can be expected on one or two days in the pre-dawn and morning. On some days, maximum day-time temperatures of 34 degrees Celsius and warm nights can be expected.

3 Slightly hazy conditions can be expected on a few days, in particular in the early morning due to the accumulation of particulate matter under light wind conditions.

4 Rainfall for June 2015 is likely to be below normal.

Review of 1 – 15 June 2015



5 Southwest Monsoon conditions prevailed in the first fortnight of June 2015 with low level winds blowing predominantly from the southeast or southwest. In the first week of June 2015, Singapore experienced a few warm days, in particular over the north-western part of the island, where the maximum daily temperature recorded was around 35 degrees Celsius.

6 During the review period, Singapore experienced thundery showers on several days in the late morning and afternoon due to strong solar heating of land areas and convergence of winds. The highest total rainfall of 68.4mm was recorded on 8 June 2015 over Jurong. On 12 June 2015, moderate to heavy thundery showers affected many parts of the island in the afternoon, and the highest total rainfall recorded that day was 65mm over Mandai.

7 Between 1 and 15 June 2015, rainfall was above average in the western parts of Singapore, and below average in the central and eastern parts of the island. The highest rainfall of 140mm and 170mm (70% to 110% above average) was recorded around Jurong, and the lowest rainfall of 20mm and 40mm (50% to 75% below average) were recorded around MacRitchie and East Coast areas.

rainfall-distribution-1-15-june-2015-(50).png
 

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
Jun, Jul and Aug
S Sumatra region - 60-70% probability below normal rainfall
All of Kalimantan region - > 70% probability below normal rainfall

Sep - Oct - Nov
S Sumatra region - 50-60% prob
Western Kalimantan - 60-70% prob
Central Kalimantan - 50-60% prob

My thoughts. Jun-Aug these 3 months would kickstart the fires. 2015, there has been no real haze in Indonesia except for 1 single incident of moderate haze in Riau province that was short-lived and with not many hotspots, late Feb to early Mar for 1 week plus.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/03/05/haze-worsens-riau.html

So the burning has not started for 2015, the guys are "waiting". I'd expect this start to be SOLID.

Jun - Aug, the wait is over, very high probability of below normal rainfall and is likely to be severe. Sep - Nov, very slightly lower probability....but the ball has started rolling, the slightly lowered probabilities don't mean anything but just to sustain the peat fires.

Note : Peat fires need minimum 7 consecutive days of heavy downpours to put out 100%. 1-3 days of rain followed by 1 week of dry season and then 1-3 days of rain again are useless, as evidenced in the fires near Palembang....in the Ogan Ilir and Ogan Ilir Komering provinces. (major hotspots there in 2014 that were not put out by 1-3 days of heavy thunderstorms lasting 6hrs daily approx, you can check wunderground.com history). The underground peat fires would smoulder when it rains and re-ignites when it's dry the next day or 2, which isn't difficult coz the whole landscape is so dry. That is why even in the first week of Dec 2014 and thrice in Nov we still kena haze, even though it has started raining by mid Nov .

A strong El Nino is very likely to push back the NE monsoon to the first week of Dec like what happened in 1997. Best case scenario is like in 2014, but possibly worse than last year.

We are already out of the Spring Predictability Barrier. Give the El Nino forecasts another week or so to mature.
 
Last edited:

faithl3ss

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Doesn't matter coz it can help spread fear to help him sell his "not-replace-but-no-need-air-purifier" coating.

do i look like i am selling something right now?:s11:
it is just sharing of the link to let ppl here to read this thread to know of The Dangers of Ionic Air Purifiers.

you seem like do not want to admit that the true of the air purifier disadvantage.
 
Last edited:

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
Guys.. u think this year got chance of haze?

See my 1.38pm reply. The gist is there, things may change a bit here and there.

The probability of having no haze is v low.

I would bet it to be over a prolonged period that's similar to 2014. Intensity - likely to be higher than 2014. How high is higher? Dont know, every season is different.

PSI 401? V Unlikely.
 
Last edited:

Asakura

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2004
Messages
59,257
Reaction score
576
one form of ozone, comes as a by-product of ionizer.
another kind is ozone generator (some sold as air purifier). some purifier emit at permissible level, as shown in link provided by WRX

if buyers are still concerned, there are also those listed as "Mechanical", using physical filtration.

the "disadvantages" does not come from a air purifier. HEPA or activated carbon filters don't generate ozone. like u put 2-3 pieces in front of a fan. unless ur fan is emitting ozone.
 

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
I found that the Sharp plasmacluster, the ones found in the air purifiers with HEPA, emit 1 ppb ozone. The permissible threshold is 50ppb. 50X lower. That is if you choose to turn on the plasmacluster function.

The thing is that even the super basic Sharp A28 HEPA air purifier at sgd99 has plasmacluster built in as feature. Consumers probably have come to expect this as normal, it's not an expensive option anyway.
Those dedicated Plasmacluster generators meant for cars and small spaces generate about 3-7 times more plasmacluster + and - ions compared to the modules found in the Sharp air purifiers.....if you want a figure, the built into APs ones generate 7000 ions per cm3 (measured in the middle of a X sq m room...forgot what X is) and the dedicated ones between 25,000 to 50,000 ions/cm3.

And seriously, every airconditioner out there from LG, Samsung, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Daikin, Fujitsu, Sanyo out there have some sort of -ve ions generation feature anyway.
 

WussRedXLi

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
94,818
Reaction score
11,437
These 2 are the dedicated ones...

https://sharp.com.sg/web/products/ProdList.asp?Catid=68

* The target floor surface area for which an emitted airborne ion density of about 25,000 ions/cm3 can cover is measured at a point near the center of the room (at a height of about 1.2 meters from the floor) with the IG-CL15 operating at a HIGH airstream setting, louvers at their lowest tilt angle, and placed near a wall.
*The number of ions will vary according to the room conditions and the IG-CL15 opeartion mode.


IG-DC2E (Car use)
◦Turbo Mode (Quick Clean Mode) – Eliminates odors in a car quickly by delivering double density (50,000 ions/ cm3) of plasmacluster ions


And the Sharp FP-E50E HEPA air purifier
#2 Size of a room in which approximately 7,000 ions can be measured per cm3 in the center of the room (at a height of approximately 1.2 meters from the floor)when the product is placed next to a wall and operated at the maximum setting
 

chuanz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
5,005
Reaction score
11
I've been running three Plantower laser particle counters for a few weeks now. Sharing the observations here. The three sensors are placed separately in common room ("ptower01"), living room ("ptower02") and MBR ("ptower03").

The correlation between the sensors are pretty good so results from different sensors are comparable.

In the charts below, I have filtered off values < 10ug/m3 as some nights the air purifier in the room is on and obviously those values should be screened out. Some outliers are actually due to transition when air purifier was turned on as obviously the air quality is not going to drop to < 10ug/m3 within 5 minutes (which is my sampling interval).

efq78Bw.png


Comparing with NEA values, the sensors are able to track NEA's readings trend, but at a higher concentration most of the times (histogram mod = 30-40% bucket). This may be due to the fact that my sensors are placed in the house, and human activities itself does increase the PM2.5 flying around (instead of settling down).

Some other sources of local influences that will push the readings up
- :lick: cooking in the kitchen
- :spin: my Roomba running
- :s17: downstairs fella smoking

I have used the living room sensor for charts below as the A/P there is dormant so far in the past few weeks.

toUJ5sd.png

XpILxkO.png

JU9GLgQ.png
 

chuanz

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
5,005
Reaction score
11
I wanted to do the same with the Shinyei sensor but every time it is plugged into my Raspberry Pi data collector, I get very noisy readings. Need to get that sorted out when I have the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top