BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 23,005
- Reaction score
- 4,535
It's worth considering both.1) You should consider future value of potential expenses to be incurred. Not income.
Sure...and your likelihood of making a disability income insurance claim without disability income insurance is definitely zero.2) You need to consider likelihood of making the claim. Toto also can give you $2M of potential earnings or income.
Sure.3) You need to consider premiums paid.
All correct, but this is also true of every other insurance product. There's nothing different here in that respect.4) Then decide if potential payouts is worth the premiums.
What is different is that this catastrophe (disability and lifetime loss of income) is, for most early and mid career adults, the very worst possible catastrophe -- or the worst possible that can be insured against, at least. It's worse than death, financially speaking. (Lingering is more expensive.) Lots of people buy life insurance, perhaps even too much of it, and don't even really question its necessity. So why all the resistance to DII? I'm not making any radical argument here. Disability and loss of lifetime income is, indeed, more financially devastating to a household -- including a household of one -- than death.
