Another CPF supporter

fatscaryuncle

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
18,887
Reaction score
5,737
I had a friend who supported cpf. Because his parents spend their money until debt, then scold govt that the cpf cannot take out
 

RadioAddict

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
8,590
Reaction score
3,252
2.5-5% guaranteed returns + law mandated 11-17% contribution by employer. Only a bad investor won’t take advantage of the system :o
 

Nuclear Boy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
20,510
Reaction score
10,702
I had a friend who supported cpf. Because his parents spend their money until debt, then scold govt that the cpf cannot take out

CPF could've just put a disclaimer on personal financial responsibility. Then give the freedom for "clients" to choose if they want to withdraw lump sum.
 

moonraiser

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
12,399
Reaction score
11,691
2.5-5% guaranteed returns + law mandated 11-17% contribution by employer. Only a bad investor won’t take advantage of the system :o
Well I don't know about your industry but in my industry work permit holders are given the same package as locals. Meaning the employer part are paid in cash.
Most investment over the long term have better yield anyways
 

1982-1994

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
60,365
Reaction score
31,251
Yep sounds about right. Really prove what I said only the low ses and low IQs will be happy for a system that is only useful those who "needs it".😂😂
Dumb, trusting, lazy, and hilariously stupid.
Low EQ spotted this time
 

moonraiser

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
12,399
Reaction score
11,691
CPF could've just put a disclaimer on personal financial responsibility. Then give the freedom for "clients" to choose if they want to withdraw lump sum.
Alternatively if you have a PR wife like me. You can transfer your cpf to her. And then when she give up her PR you can "cash out" earlier. I'm considering that but still weighting my options.
 

RadioAddict

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Messages
8,590
Reaction score
3,252
Well I don't know about your industry but in my industry work permit holders are given the same package as locals. Meaning the employer part are paid in cash.
Most investment over the long term have better yield anyways
Yes we have discussed about this before :o unfortunately not everyone can have the discipline to save or even hit 4% guaranteed returns by themselves. You just need to go take alook at the kopitiam and ask yourself honestly how many of them can exceed the returns of CPF if they invest by themselves?

I am so very sure most SME won’t be paying their employees additional 11-17% more wages if today we abolish the rule of employer contribution. This is my opinion but I’m pretty sure I’m right on the spot for that :o
 

moonraiser

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
12,399
Reaction score
11,691
Low EQ spotted this time
Bro just being honest. I know it doesn't sound good but there is no nice way to put it. I think people are just not as financially literate as they can/should be. That's why they see cpf as good
 

moonraiser

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
12,399
Reaction score
11,691
Yes we have discussed about this before :o unfortunately not everyone can have the discipline to save or even hit 4% guaranteed returns by themselves. You just need to go take alook at the kopitiam and ask yourself honestly how many of them can exceed the returns of CPF if they invest by themselves?

I am so very sure most SME won’t be paying their employees additional 11-17% more wages if today we abolish the rule of employer contribution. This is my opinion but I’m pretty sure I’m right on the spot for that :o
Oh ya we've talked briefly over pm on similar topics didn't we?

Well I have my personal opinions on that topic but that's for another thread I think😂

In gym now pumping iron not enough blood for both muscles and brain
 

Shawny88

Master Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
4,074
Reaction score
1,049
CPF could've just put a disclaimer on personal financial responsibility. Then give the freedom for "clients" to choose if they want to withdraw lump sum.
This will never work. You never see how many people whack govt because they saw elderly still working or homeless without fact checking first?

Many people will abuse it as they know govt will always help the poor, at the expense of tax payers
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top