Individual preference and metabolic response.He may be following a true ketogenic diet rather than a keto-styled approach, and ultimately, individual preference and metabolic response are what matter most.
Hmmmm
Individual preference and metabolic response.He may be following a true ketogenic diet rather than a keto-styled approach, and ultimately, individual preference and metabolic response are what matter most.
You rem? Prove it please.I think he is quietly eating fruits and vegetables.
I remember him posting that.
I don't believe its no fruits and no vegetables.
https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...-type-of-breast-cancer.7116160/post-156463402The simple reason why there is an imbalance because people are eating an unbalanced diet.
If you add fish and nuts, your omega 3 intake is higher.
If you are keen, you can do a deep dive into Randall cycle to find out why a mixed intake (glucose and fats) is not ideal.@rogze79 over to you
Only mad people will eat that amount of fish.https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...-type-of-breast-cancer.7116160/post-156463402
Eating enough fish to supply 125 g of omega‑3 would require 2.7–6.9 kg per day.
The test name doesn't matter.You rem? Prove it please.
Do you also rem you 'checked' your homa ir and claimed that you are insulin sensitive? I'm still waiting for you to tell me the name of the test.
It seems that your memory is failing you. Due to low LDL?
you are a joke la. Till now, you still do not know there's no such particular test.The test name doesn't matter.
I measured both fasting insulin and glucose. And I was being paid.
you are a joke la. Till now, you still do not know there's no such particular test.
Rather than telling ppl straight what these numbers are, you said something else.
Plucking numbers out from nothing?
Again, you have demonstrated your half past six knowledge and lack of inquisition.You are such a joke.
Just google easily can already give you an answer.
Even checkyrmed had given an answer from google.
You are thinking like a squarebox.Because it doesn't exist.
Dunn deflect the topic of your 'homa ir' test.You are thinking like a squarebox.
If an accurate test doesn't exist, find the next best alternative test then. Thats how Science works.
So means ROS, insulin sensitivity and related, but caused by ang moh evil scientist laSummary:
We can say that the high metabolic dysfunction, high omega-6 ratio in the population, and chronic diseases are significantly the result of corrupted scientists, particularly Frederick Stare at Harvard. In 1965, Stare was paid the equivalent of $48,000 in today's dollars by the Sugar Research Foundation to promote sugar as safe, claiming up to 30% of daily calories could come from sugar. He shifted blame from sugar to saturated fat while promoting corn oil and soy oil, publishing these industry-favorable views in prestigious journals without disclosing his financial conflicts.
Stare's corrupted research created a cascading health crisis. His promotion of omega-6 rich vegetable oils over saturated fats led to the inflammatory omega-6 dominance we see today. Meanwhile, his normalization of high sugar consumption while demonizing natural fats created the perfect conditions for insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. The dietary guidelines based on his corrupted science coincided with the obesity epidemic beginning in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
This pattern of corruption continues, with scientists at Stanford and Harvard promoting plant-based diets while receiving funding from meat-alternative companies. Frederick Stare's corrupted science, funded by the sugar industry, bears significant responsibility for creating the dietary paradigm that led to our current epidemics of metabolic dysfunction, inflammatory disease, and chronic illness, proving that one corrupted scientist's influence can devastate public health across generations.
I can't believe he quoted a 1965 case.So means ROS, insulin sensitivity and related, but caused by ang moh evil scientist la
Samurai bro, 你吃过samurai 吗
Where got samurai so long winded one
I tot they are looking from historical povI can't believe he quoted a 1965 case.
I don't know how relevant is Science and regulations in 1965 compared to now.I tot they are looking from historical pov
I still dunno what going on
LikeI don't know how relevant is Science and regulations in 1965 compared to now.
There were so much changes then and now.