thyler_koh
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2001
- Messages
- 8,082
- Reaction score
- 3,949
Next time this people will have a misc cost of $150 and you know what it is 
Same to you, don't cherry pick implementation over intent.dont cherry pick the statement. Read this also.
Second, road taxes – which are based on engine capacity - are higher for, bigger cars, which tend to consume more fuel and produce more emissions than small cars.
Say is cycling lane but should know its not purely for bicycle. Its a general purpose road lane for any other vehicle that is not a motor vehicle.
In other more advance society alot long ago a much as possible try to have proper segregation of pedestrian, non-motorised vehicle, and motor vehicle. Only local still come out pattern want to mix them, thus create alot of conflicts.
Some more local motor vehicle not exactly cheap, its a luxury most ordinary people cannot afford. Local want to promote car lite. And increasingly there are other non motorised vehicles usage. Which they lack their proper road. So why want to give more space to motor vehicle leh.

why don't gov set a law that say peak hours or Monday to Friday = no cycling on roads
Like that drivers can less stress
I wonder do cyclist believe in statistics....?
How about raising the cost of driving so these drivers who cant afford to upkeep their car go take bus/MRT and be less stress? Also less stress for the other drivers due to fewer cars on the roads
wellThis is the problem
The most scariest thing drivers want speed and save time
cyclist may kena bang by drivers who want speed and time saving
Then why EVs pay higher road tax?dont cherry pick the statement. Read this also.
Second, road taxes – which are based on engine capacity - are higher for, bigger cars, which tend to consume more fuel and produce more emissions than small cars.
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ce-for-riding-in-groups-larger-than-permitted
Mr Lawrence Choo, 45, founding member of cycling enthusiast groups 10101010 and Faber X, suggested that the guideline for motorists to adhere to a minimum distance of 1.5m when passing cyclists on roads be passed into law, so that it can be enforced like the group cycling rules.
He added that drivers should learn that cyclists also have a right to be on the roads.
Mr Kiki Matthias Cheng, founder of cycling enthusiast group Riding Kakis (Singapore), said it may be more effective to influence cyclists to become role models who “walk the ground” and advocate safer cycling practices within their cycling groups.
The 52-year-old operations director added that this could help “activate” the cycling community in spreading good cycling practices, compared with a top-down approach through law enforcement.
Mr Khaw and Mr Ng both suggested building more dedicated cycling infrastructure, such as cycling lanes that allow road users to give cyclists the right of way.
![]()
don't waste time with spandex logic and their whataboutismcome let me educate you,
solo cyclists are a bane to hog a lane,
not unlawful, an unsightly selfish behavior, deserving of insults many times.
motorbike argument? a road cyclist is not as safe and as fast as one.
meek
I know the rules if they adhere
that is why road cyclists can go home have dinner and watch tv.