Hi experts, I have a question about topping up young kid's MA. If we top up kid's MA, the MA account will earn 5% interest (4% + 1% extra interest to be earned on the first S$60,000 of combined balances) right?
Correct.
Also, since we are topping kid's MA, would we (as parents) be able to tap on the kid's MA in the event of a medical need when we are older? I was not sure because I understand that CPF members can use their Medisave to pay for medical expenses of immediate family members. But what if the kid is below 21? Can the kid "consent" to the use of his/her MA for use by parents?
As Royalmix highlighted, below the legal age of a majority a parent can approve of a child's use of MA to support qualified/eligible family members' medical needs (to the extent MA can be used). When the child reaches the age of majority it's solely up to the child (now adult).
I'm phrasing it a little differently than a specific age in order to be precise and accurate. Singapore
could change its legal age of majority to some other age.
If possible, then I would think that it is more practical to top up kid's MA rather than SA as there is somewhat more flexibility in the use of the MA (for the kid's own medical expenses, as well as parents/dependents), rather than SA (which is pretty much locked up forever).
I agree with this logic insofar as it goes, but I would carry the logic to what I think is its logical conclusion.
I'm not a big fan of adding funds to any of a child's CPF accounts. Not in general, anyway, in contrast to ordinary long-term investing. Children have the very longest investment time horizons among living people, and so if anyone can benefit from long-term investments it's children. So why not start investing in long-term investments for a child? That could be a low cost stock index fund on its own or mixed with a long-term bond index fund — although not too much of the latter, I would argue. Such funds happen to be liquid if there's a genuine emergency, such as the child genuinely needing mental health services that insurance and MA don't fully pay for that are otherwise unaffordable.
But there are some edge cases. One example is when a child is born with multiple citizenships and will probably not retain Singaporean citizenship upon reaching adulthood. In that case MA (especially at 5% p.a. interest) makes a pretty good college/university savings account. Once the child loses his/her Singaporean citizenship the CPF Board will disburse all CPF savings to the child, including all accrued interest. That's not bad, even if it's the "wrong" currency (Singapore dollars). And if your supposition is wrong, and the child decides to remain a Singaporean citizen instead, having a fatter MA account than otherwise is still at least a decent outcome. Of course here too Singapore could change its nationality law, and the child might be allowed to retain Singaporean citizenship under some future nationality law. And that'd still be a fine outcome. And if there's something that can be paid for with MA dollars along the way, that's fine too.
There are also some edge cases involving asset protection objectives. CPF savings are well protected against calamities such as adverse court judgments and creditor claims. If you're careful you may be able to shield separately titled children's assets to some extent, but a child's CPF savings would be even better protected against such calamities. For most people it's not a big issue, but for some it might be. Sometimes the asset protection that you're trying to obtain is protection against someone doing something stupid, like otherwise taking the dollars and spending them at a casino in Las Vegas. Obviously you can't do that with a child's MA dollars.
Sometimes it might be a generous family member with this idea (adding funds to a child's MA), and perhaps the choice is either that or nothing. OK, no problem! MA it is, and thanks to that family member for their generosity, even if it has those particular boundaries.
Even in these edge cases you should be aware of possible foreign tax complications, for example. It's common for a foreign tax jurisdiction to levy income tax on CPF interest, every year. Even though those MA dollars are only partially liquid. And tax laws can change, too. Moreover, if/when your child applies to a university that's considering the child's (and family's) financial means, the child's own assets tend to count most heavily against the child in that computation — even more heavily weighted than parental assets.