General S-REITs Discussion Thread

dappermen

Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
8,663
Reaction score
1,017
Yes i agree w u:
Merg or after merged is never a Big Main issue in our discussion for now
Merged or not is not the main issue...just feel cict and mct now overrated.
Sorry sub 5% means below 5%?


If cict and mct stock prices are not growing, I am not sure why investors are happy with sub 5% yield .

if price dropped, and dpu also droped more than relative- this is even a big No-no!!!

U have gd taste also:
For me, FLCT and KepPacOak each constitutes ard 20% of my portfolio. Much as I like them, I am mindful of my significant exposure and only added a little more of these 2 during the recent dip. I was actually averaging up.
Among so many foreign- u picked keppac!!!! Not many dare to!
3 incld u i heard of!!!!
deep foresight!!!!!
i assumed u did it not for “speculation” or short-term
The keppac thread is dead…..
Flct’s too , but they r gd… an understtm but damned real gd!!!

B it our objectives and strategies r diff, picking gd ones r critical, no1 shared how gd r flct or kepac at all (here)
No1….maybe uob only?!!



kepac:
more than 30% gearing is fine! esp equiped w healthy returns

Never greed by Zooming in purely into div Yield %

High Yield Singapore REITs if just to pick 2​

TickerCompanyDividend Yield (%)Gearing ratio (%)Price to book ratio (times)3 year compounded total return* (%)
CEDUDasin Retail REIT16.837.80.2-23.1
BWCUEC World REIT9.637.30.70.5
CRPUSasseur REIT9.026.20.89.9
K71UKeppel Pacific Oak US REIT9.137.50.96.5
BTOUManulife US REIT9.542.80.9-5.2
OXMUPrime US REIT9.539.10.91.2
ODBUUnited Hampshire US REIT9.938.90.88.9**
AW9UFirst REIT9.035.70.9-26.1
*Total return includes dividend and capital gain/loss, **2 year compounded
 
Last edited:

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
6,150
Merged or not is not the main issue...just feel cict and mct has stopped performing even before covid and are now overrated. If cict and mct stock prices are not growing, I am not sure why investors are happy with sub 5% yield .
5% yield with lower risk, why not. I don't dare to touch those 8% and above, with higher risk, you don't know when the REITs got problem. Rem First REIT, Lippo, Dasin, EC World etc......
So far only CLCT and MNACT I dare to hold with more than 5% yield. The risk is control but still have China political risk.

For MCT with little growth and about 5% yield, I think this type is stable REIT. You don't have to worry any bad debts or revenue big drop etc.. Almost guarantee about 5% dividend yearly, why not. Better than CPF SA account. :p
 

soneat

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
318
Yes i agree w u:
Merg or after merged is never a Big Main issue in our discussion for now

Sorry sub 5% means below 5%?




if price dropped, and dpu also droped more than relative- this is even a big No-no!!!

U have gd taste also:

Among so many foreign- u picked keppac!!!! Not many dare to!
3 incld u i heard of!!!!
deep foresight!!!!!
i assumed u did it not for “speculation” or short-term
The keppac thread is dead…..
Flct’s too , but they r gd… an understtm but damned real gd!!!

B it our objectives and strategies r diff, picking gd ones r critical, no1 shared how gd r flct or kepac at all (here)
No1….maybe uob only?!!




kepac:
It's not about dare or don't dare. For investors that don't know what they are doing, they are more of a speculator.

There r stocks that I invested and fully divested when situation changed. FLCT is one counter that I have held for a very long time, since the time it was renamed to FCOT.

Notice that I also mentioned I have added some prime but not must. This obviously was not a random decision.
 

dappermen

Banned
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
8,663
Reaction score
1,017
ok to have random so long have Spare cash

It is about dare or not dare..........there are alot dont dabble on non-sgd counters (nothing wrong) and they cannot accept hybrid WALEs (appeared to be risky) so not dare

u may try asking many of the experts here, who dare to accept 1 in USD w high gearing ratio close to 40%


more than 30% gearing is fine! esp equiped w healthy returns

Never greed by Zooming in purely into div Yield %

High Yield Singapore REITs if just to pick 2​

TickerCompanyDividend Yield (%)Gearing ratio (%)Price to book ratio (times)3 year compounded total return* (%)
CEDUDasin Retail REIT16.837.80.2-23.1
BWCUEC World REIT9.637.30.70.5
CRPUSasseur REIT9.026.20.89.9
K71UKeppel Pacific Oak US REIT9.137.50.96.5
BTOUManulife US REIT9.542.80.9-5.2
OXMUPrime US REIT9.539.10.91.2
ODBUUnited Hampshire US REIT9.938.90.88.9**
AW9UFirst REIT9.035.70.9-26.1
*Total return includes dividend and capital gain/loss, **2 year compounded
u could easily see no1 discusses keppac at all : https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/...-oak-us-reit-official-sgx-cmou.5712873/page-9
 

Shion

Senior Mentor
Joined
Oct 24, 2008
Messages
377,408
Reaction score
123,169

Analysts positive on S-REITs as tapering hike momentum 'turns the tide'​


https://www.theedgesingapore.com/ca...ive-s-reits-tapering-hike-momentum-turns-tide
DBS Group Research analysts Geraldine Wong, Derek Tan, Rachel Tan and Dale Lai are optimistic on the Singapore REITs (S-REITs) sector. This is in light of having much economic tumult blown over for the sector, as the Fed hike momentum tapers and inflation levels wane, the analysts write in their Aug 1 report.

The Fed has hiked by 75 basis points (bps) which resulted in a strong rally in the US indices. In addition, guidelines on forward hikes appear to suggest a slowdown in the pace of rate hikes.

The analysts view this “small pivot” by the Fed to be a significant guidance, opening the door to a downshift in hikes in 2HFY2022 ending December.

“At this stage, we are now past the “three peaks” – peak inflation, peak Fed action, and peak Fed rhetoric, which has been an overhang for the S-REITs,” they write.

The analysts see a stronger backdrop for the S-REITs in 2HFY2022 as they see the unwinding of themes such as a strong US dollar and higher rates. “As such, while the S-REITs have underperformed in the 1HFY2022 down 3.4% compared to the Straits Times Index (STI)’s 2.3% rise, we sense the ‘turn of the tide’, especially with the market focusing on possible rate rates in 2023,” they say.

“Our economists are projecting that SG 10-year yields will peak out in 3QFY2022 at around 3.2% before declining towards 2.65% by end of 2023 on the back of lower inflation and an economic slowdown,” the analysts add. At a FY2023 yield of 6.1%, this implies that the current yield will expand from an expected 3.3% to 3.5% over time.

The S-REITs have held steady in July, the analysts observe, up 0.6% though underperforming as compared to the 2.2% rise in the STI.

Amongst the various subsectors, the industrial S-REITs are up 2.4% for large caps and 1.9% for mid-caps, with Retail S-REITs up 2.1%, given the respective sectors’ perceived resilience against economic slowdown.

Office S-REITs (-1.3%) and hospitality S-REITs (-1.1%) declined given their closer correlation to economic growth, say the analysts.

In terms of stocks, best performers are Daiwa House Logistics Trust (DHLT), up 7.7%; Mapletree Logistics Trust (MLT), up 4.1%; and Mapletree Industrial Trust (MLT), up 3.4%.

On a whole, with the current interim results season still underway, S-REITs that have reported results showed a strong rebound in earnings for 1HFY2022 to the analysts, on the back of positive organic growth prospects with robust guidelines in 2HFY2022. “We saw strong rental reversions seen in the office, industrial and retail spaces,” write the analysts.

Notably, the hospitality space is seeing a strong revenue per available room (RevPAR) rebound in 2QFY2022, with most hoteliers reporting RevPAR upside over 50% y-o-y from pent-up leisure demand.

In a separate report, CGS Group Research analyst Lock Mun Yee is “overweight” on S-REITs, seeing how hospitality REITs have been boosted by strong demand, delivering a robust set of 1HFY2022 results driven by an improvement in RevPAR in most markets they are in.

“There has been strong growth in 2QFY2022 RevPARs surpassing 2019 levels in several markets, though China and Japan continue to lag recovery due to travel restrictions,” says Lock.

The Singapore Tourism Board (STB) projects tourist arrivals to reach 4 million-6 million in 2022, or 21%-32% of 2019 levels. For June, Singapore recorded 1.5 million inbound tourists.

Hospitality REITs indicated that business demand has picked up, says Lock, particularly from small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and project group bookings, although larger scale corporate bookings are still absent. That said, the current occupancy levels have enabled hotel operators to execute yield management strategies across their portfolio.

Moreover, hoteliers have regained pricing power on the back of strong demand, observes Lock. “In addition, the short stay profile provides REITs with pricing flexibility to raise prices to offset inflationary costs, enabling them to preserve margins,” she adds.

In Singapore, while the hospitality market is experiencing a strong recovery, CDL Hospitality Trusts (CDLHT) and Far East Hospitality Trust (FEHT) have retained two and four hotels on government contracts respectively. “We believe this would bolster portfolio occupancy levels while generating better returns as they have been re-contracted at higher rates,” says Lock.

The analyst also observes how hospitality REITs balance sheets remain robust with gearing levels ranging from 33.3% for FEHT, 37.5% for Ascott Residence Trust (ART) and 39.5% for CDLHT, as at end-1HFY2022.

In addition, the REITs have hedged between 60.9%-79% of their debt into fixed rates. In terms of impact, every 25 bp change in average funding cost would impact CDREIT, ART and FEHT’s distribution income by 2%, 0.9% and 1% respectively, explains Lock. With cap rates still remaining stable, hospitality REITs indicated that they would continue to tap into acquisition growth opportunities.

CGS’s hospitality top pick is now FEHT as it continues to benefit from demand recovery in its hotel and service residences (SR) segments while the stated distribution of divestment gains would provide an upside kicker.

The analyst places an “add” rating on FEHT with a target price of 78 cents. “Strong corporate demand has resulted in SR revenue per available unit (RevPAUs) [for FEHT] surpassing pre-Covid-19 levels, while its newly revamped hotel offerings have allowed it to better compete with its peers and drive higher room rates,” writes Lock.

FEHT’s 1HFY2022 distribution income of $30.6 million, inclusive of divestment gains of $1.6 million, was slightly above the analyst’s expectations, underpinned by a 31.4% and 31.9% rise in the RevPAR of its hotel and SR segments.

Lock observes FEHT’s capital gain distributions amounting to $8 million per annum (p.a.) or 0.47 cents/unit for three years, arising from the divestment of Central Square, providing an added yield uplift on top of her 4.3%/5.5% FY2022/FY2023 distribution per unit (DPU) yield.

Other picks by CGS-CIMB include ART and CDREIT, where Lock accords “add” ratings to both REITs as well and target prices of $1.24 and $1.38 respectively.

For ART, its geographically diversified portfolio of SRs, business hotels and extended stay assets strike a balance between stable and growth income, says Lock, with long-stay demand providing stability that is highly valued in a hospitality counter, while shorter-stays allow it to drive rates, providing earnings upside.

Lock also observes that ART recorded a 13.6% y-o-y rise in DPU as RevPAU ticked up 85% q-o-q to $124, its eighth consecutive quarter of RevPAU improvement.

“With 66% assets under management (AUM) in Singapore, CDLHT is a proxy for the recovery of the Singapore hospitality sector,” writes Lock. “Asset Enhancement Initiatives (AEIs) undertaken at several of its properties and strong demand across its other key markets of Australia, Maldives and UK will continue to support further RevPAR growth.”

Hospitality REITs such as ART and CDLHT are trading at around 1.01x P/NAV while FEHT is trading at 0.75x P/NAV. ART and CDLHT 1HFY2022 DPU came in above the analyst’s FY2022 expectations while FEHT missed.“Nonetheless, we believe net asset value (NAV) would likely remain robust on the back of strong operating performance,” says the analyst.

Overall, Lock believes that the upward momentum of demand from both domestic and international travel would continue for the rest of FY2022, where the reopening of borders and resumption of global travel will underpin demand for hotel and serviced residence accommodation.

As at 11.53am, units in ART, CDLHT and FEHT are trading at $1.16, $1.29 and 64 cents respectively.
 

homer123

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
10,201
Reaction score
5,144
Indeed. I am a little like limster and have some target prices in mind. If price reach, just trigger. Be it buy or sell.

Recently I also picked up Prime, which a number of folks r whining it's not good. Time will tell.
Result is good for Prime.. Can't complain about 10% yield and improving financial metrics

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threads/prime-us-reit.6071389/page-7
55e867020b3fcb071d4c02b9eb9bf643be769e09.
 

soneat

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
318
Result is good for Prime.. Can't complain about 10% yield and improving financial metrics

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threads/prime-us-reit.6071389/page-7
55e867020b3fcb071d4c02b9eb9bf643be769e09.
I have already anticipated/forecasted Prime results (and trajectory) to be slightly better than KepPacOak and thats why I chose to accumulate more of this on weakness. Having said that, there's never a perfect reit. Prime is not perfect and has its fair share of risk. Just need to understand what we are getting into and buy the right thing at the right price. =) Operationally I think they are doing OK (slightly below my expectation).

There's far too many "experts" out there and I am simply too lazy to share any thoughts because there will be pple arguing and arguing. =p

MUST just released their results as well. Quite expectedly, doesn't look good.
 
Last edited:

TehSi99

Master Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
4,892
Reaction score
1,318
I have already anticipated/forecasted Prime results (and trajectory) to be slightly better than KepPacOak and thats why I chose to accumulate more of this on weakness. Having said that, there's never a perfect reit. Prime is not perfect and has its fair share of risk. Just need to understand what we are getting into and buy the right thing at the right price. =) Operationally I think they are doing OK (slightly below my expectation).

There's far too many "experts" out there and I am simply too lazy to share any thoughts because there will be pple arguing and arguing. =p

MUST just released their results as well. Quite expectedly, doesn't look good.

My take now is investing purely in US reits can go either way in short term. Too many factors.

May need to hold longer than expected if things don't go our way.

DYDD.
 

soneat

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
318
Result is good for Prime.. Can't complain about 10% yield and improving financial metrics

https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/threads/prime-us-reit.6071389/page-7
55e867020b3fcb071d4c02b9eb9bf643be769e09.
Interestingly, Prime is trading at 74 which means I have established a margin of safety @ >10% within a couple of weeks (my entry was around 67). If I choose to off load half of what I bought now (at this moment). I will be staring at a margin of safety @ around 20% with a yield of 16.7%. This is assuming I want to trade but I am kind of lazy these days. Ok that's it for now. =D
 

homer123

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
10,201
Reaction score
5,144
Interestingly, Prime is trading at 74 which means I have established a margin of safety @ >10% within a couple of weeks (my entry was around 67). If I choose to off load half of what I bought now (at this moment). I will be staring at a margin of safety @ around 20% with a yield of 16.7%. This is assuming I want to trade but I am kind of lazy these days. Ok that's it for now. =D
I am happy for you.. Fortune favor the brave... Before last night result, some people even just write this off as another Eagle Reit...LOL
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
6,150
Interestingly, Prime is trading at 74 which means I have established a margin of safety @ >10% within a couple of weeks (my entry was around 67). If I choose to off load half of what I bought now (at this moment). I will be staring at a margin of safety @ around 20% with a yield of 16.7%. This is assuming I want to trade but I am kind of lazy these days. Ok that's it for now. =D
I brought at 68 cents :p

Agree with you on your previous post,
"There's far too many "experts" out there and I am simply too lazy to share any thoughts because there will be pple arguing and arguing. =p"
Some people just don't understand what are they arguing, must be troll then.
 

soneat

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2000
Messages
1,888
Reaction score
318
I am happy for you.. Fortune favor the brave... Before last night result, some people even just write this off as another Eagle Reit...LOL
Haha....It's ok as long as they are happy. I am happy as well.

But I would say its not entirely positive although the headlines etc make it sound super positive. Personally I think they delivered a decent set of results (which is slightly less than what I expected) in pretty challenging conditions.
 

addict951

High Honorary Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Messages
188,425
Reaction score
20,639
Maple PAC vestors, song boh? BBs slowly accumulating after realising it’s undervalued hor :D :s12:
 

Andrew833

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2017
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
6,150
I am happy for you.. Fortune favor the brave... Before last night result, some people even just write this off as another Eagle Reit...LOL
Prime US as another Eagle Reit? Impossible lol.
Possible candidates is Dasin and maybe EC World.
Prime US provide quite consistent results with no bad debts issue.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top